Research to Determine the Potential Use of Humanoid (Anthropomorphic) Robots in Accommodation Facilities

Abstract

Study participants evaluated the use of robots in general, and specifically the use of humanoid robots for 36 different job positions in accommodation establishments in Turkey. This exploratory study aimed to determine the positions in which it will be easier to adopt the use of robots in accommodation businesses. It also examined the role of the participant's gender and age regarding the potential use of robots. An online survey was used to collect data, and the data was obtained from 407 participants. Contrary to the theory of anthropomorphism, but consistent with the Uncanny Valley and social comparison theories, the results of the study showed that the participants were adamant that it was not appropriate to use robots for 25 of the job positions out of 36. Humanoid robots were considered appropriate for positions that provide cleaning services, perform takeaway and delivery services, or where customers do not interact one-on-one during their stay. It was concluded that young people evaluated the use of robots in the sector more positively than older people. Similarly, women tended to make more positive evaluations than men. The original value of this research is based on the lack of studies evaluating the potential of using robots for positions in accommodation establishments.

Keywords

• Humanoid Robot
• Antropomorphism Theory
• Uncanny Valley Theory
• Social Comparison Theory
• Hospitality Management

References

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261.
2. Alexieva, S. (2016). Sustainable tourism development between innovation competitiveness of the industry and effective communications in the digital era. Journal of Science and Research, 9, 41-50.
3. Arduengo, M., & Sentis, L. (2019). Robot economy: ready or not, here it comes. Retrieved April 25, 2021, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.01755.
4. Bares, J. E., & Wettergreen, D. S. (1999). Dante II: technical description, results, and lessons learned. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 18(7), 621-649.
5. Baudrillard, J. (1968). Systeme des objets. Paris, Gallimard: S.E.P.C. Press.
6. Bowen, J., & Morosan, C. (2018). Beware hospitality industry: robots are coming. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 10(6), 726-733.
7. Brink, K. A., Gray, K., & Wellman, H. M. (2019). Creepiness creeps in: uncanny valley feelings are acquired in childhood. Child Development, 90(4), 1202-1214.
8. Ceccarelli, M., Russo, M., & Morales-Cruz, C. (2020). Parallel architectures for humanoid robots. Robotics, 9(4), 75.

9. Choi, Y., Choi, M., Oh, M., & Kim, S. (2020). Service robots in hotels: understanding the service quality perceptions of human-robot interaction. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 29(6), 1-24.
10. Christou, P. A., Simillidou, A., & Stylianou, M. (2020a). Robots in tourism: tourists’ perceptions over the use of anthropomorphic and other types of robots in services. Apac CHRIE 2020, October, Hong Kong.
11. Christou, P., Simillidou, A., & Stylianou, M. C. (2020b). Tourists’ perceptions regarding the use of anthropomorphic robots in tourism and hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Managemen, 32(11), 3665-3683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2020-0423.
12. CIA World Factboom. (2020). Retrieved November 13, 2021, from https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey/#people-and-society.
13. Çilingir Ük, Z., Gültekin, Y., & Arslan, B. (2019). Turizm sektöründe mesleki toplumsal cinsiyet algılamalarının belirlenmesi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir uygulama. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 6(2), 75-97.
14. Delikan, B., & Şener, G. (2020). Marka maskotlarındaantropomorfizm kullanımına yönelik göstergebilimselbir analiz: Arçelik markası robot çelik vakası. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(3), 1836-1854.
15. Di Salvo, C., Gemperle, F., & Forlizzi, J. (2005). Imitating the human form: four kinds of anthropomorphic form. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kiesler/anthropomorphism-org/pdf/Imitating.pdf.
16. Doğan, S., & Vatan, A. (2019). Hotel managers’ thoughts towards new technologies and service robots at hotels: a qualitative study in Turkey. In: C. Cobanoglu, M. Cavusoglu, A. Corbaci (eds.) Advances in Global Business and Economics, Vol. 2, ANAHEI Publishing, Sarasota, 382-399.
17. Doxey, G. V. (1975). A causation theory of visitor resident irritants: methodology and research inferences. Paper Presented at the Travel and Tourism Research Association Sixth Annual Conference Proceedings, San Diego, 195-198.
18. Engelberger, J. F. (1999). Historical perspective and role in automation. Handbooks of industrial robotics. In S. Y. Nof (eds.), Handbook of industrial robotics, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 3-10.
19. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886.
20. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
21. Flach, L. M., Moura, R. H., Musse, S. R., Dill, V., Pinho, M. S., & Lykawka, C. (2012). Evaluation of the uncanny valley in CG characters, in Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment (SB Games) (Brasiìlia), 108-116.
22. Fron, C., & Korn, O. (2019). A short history of the perception of robots and automata from antiquity to modern times. In Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction, Offenburg, Germany: Springer, Cham.
23. Fusté-Forné, F., & Jamal, T. (2021). Co-creating new directions for service robots in hospitality and tourism. Tourism and Hospitality, 2(1), 43-61.
24. Geller, T. (2008). Overcoming the uncanny valley. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(4), 11-17.
25. Geoghegan, B. D. (2020). Orientalism and informatics: alterity from the chess-playing Turk to Amazon’s mechanical Turk. Ex-position, 43, 45-90.
26. Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: a new theory of religion. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Güngörmüş E. (2018). İnsanın karanlığı ve Freud. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from http://www.ercankesal.com/makaleler-sunumlar/insanin-karanligi-ve-freud/.
28. Gürgöze, G., & Türkoğlu, İ. (2019). Kullanım alanlarına göre robot sistemlerinin sınıflandırılması. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 31(1), 53-66.
29. Hjalager, A. M. (2015). Turizmi değiştiren 100 yenilik (Çeviren: Güler, O., Akdağ, G., Çakıcı, A. C. ve Benli, S.). Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 26(2): 290-317.
30. Hockstein, N., Gourin, C., Faust, R., & Terris, D. (2007). A history of robots: from science fiction to surgical robotics. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 1, 113-118.
31. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26.
32. Huang, H. L., Cheng, L. K., Sun, P. C., & Chou, S. J. (2021). The effects of perceived identity threat and realistic threat on the negative attitudes and use intentions toward hotel service robots: the moderating effect of the robot’s anthropomorphism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13, 1599-1611.
33. Ivanov, S. H., Webster, C., & Berezina, K. (2017). Adoption of robots and service automation by tourism and hospitality companies. Revista Turismo & Desenvolvimento, 27(28), 1501-1517.
34. Ivanov, S., Webster, C., & Garenko, A. (2018a). Young Russian adults’ attitudes towards the potential use of robots in hotels. Technology in Society, 55, 24-32.
35. Ivanov, S., Webster, C., & Seyyedi, P. (2018b). Consumers' attitudes towards the introduction of robots in accommodation establishments. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 66(3), 302-317.
36. İbiş, S. (2019). Turizm endüstrisinde robotlaşma. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 403-420.
37. Jia, J. W., Chung, N., & Hwang, J. (2021). Assessing the hotel service robot interaction on tourists’ behaviour: the role of anthropomorphism. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 121(6), 1457-1478.
38. Kayıkçı, M. Y., & Bozkurt, A. K. (2018). Dijital çağ vealphakuşağı, yapay zeka uygulamaları ve turizme yansımaları. Sosyal Bilimler Metinleri, 1, 54-64.
39. Khogeer, Y. K. (2013). Brand anthropomorphism: the literary lives of marketing mascots (PhD Thesis). University of Liverpool, Management School, Liverpool.
40. Kim, S. S., Kim, J., Badu-Baiden, F., Giroux, M., & Choi, Y. (2021). Preference for robot service or human service in hotels? Impacts of the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93, 2-12.
41. Konstantinova, S. (2019). Digital transformation in tourism. Knowledge International Journal, 35(1), 188-193.
42. Kurfess, Thomas R. (2005). Robotics and automation handbook. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
43. Kuramoto, S., Sawada, H., & Hartono, P. (2020). Visualization of topographical internal representation of learning robots. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 1-7.
44. Lin, I., & Mattila, A. (2021). The value of service robots from the hotel guest’s perspective: a mixed-method approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 2-4.
45. Lukanova, G., & Ilieva, G. (2019). Robots, artificial intelligence and service automation in hotels. In S. Ivanov and C. Webster (eds.), Robots, artificial intelligence, and service automation in travel, tourism, and hospitality. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 157-183.
46. Luo, J. M., Vu, H. Q., Li, G., & Law, R. (2021). Understanding service attributes of robot hotels: a sentiment analysis of customer online reviews. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 98(103032), 1-10.
47. MacInnis, D. J., & Folkes, V. S. (2017). Humanizing brands: when brands seem to be like me, part of me, and in a relationship with me. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(3), 355-374.
48. Mehta, C. R., & Patel, N. R. (2011). IBM SPSS exact tests. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation. Merriam-Webster English Dictionary (2021). Robot. Retrieved May 11, 2021, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/robot.
49. Murphy, J., Gretzel, U., & Hofacker, C. (2017). Service robots in hospitality and tourism: investigating anthropomorphism. In 15th APacCHRIE conference (Vol. 31), Retrieved May 11, 2021, from http://heli.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/APacCHRIE2017_Service-Robots_paper-200.pdf
50. Needham, J. (1991). Science and civilisation in China. History of scientific thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Ohlan, R. (2018). Role of information technology in hotel industry. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 3(2): 277-281.
52. Online Etymology Dictionary (2021). Retrieved September 22, 2021, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/robot.
53. Pareyson, L. (1996). Ontologie de la liberte, Retrieved day?, date?, from www.lyber-eclat.net / lyber / pareyson / ontoll-12.html.
54. Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J. (2009). Pushing the envelope of brand and personality: antecedents and moderators of anthropomorphized brands. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 412-420.
55. Qiu, Z., & Wang, Z. (2020). Technology forecasting based on semantic and citation analysis of patents: a case of robotics domain. Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) 2021 IEEE International Conference, 203-209.
56. Reis, J., Melão, N., Salvadorinho, J., Soares, B., & Rosete, A. (2020). Service robots in the hospitality industry: The case of Henn-na hotel, Japan. Technology in Society, 63, 101423.
57. Robotics Federation Annual Report (2020). Retrieved November 16, 2021, from https://ifr.org/img/worldrobotics/Executive_Summary_WR_2020_Industrial_Robots_1.pdf.
58. Rosheim, M. E. (1994). Robot evolution: The development of anthrobotics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
59. Rusu, N., & Rusu, A. (2020). Filosofiainvențiilor Lui Leonardo Da Vinci siimportanțalorînevoluțiamecanicii. In Conferinţatehnico-ştiinţifică a studenţilor, masteranzilorşidoctoranzilor, 503-506.
60. Sharma, R., Uniyal, M., & Sharma, N. (2020). Guest attitude towards introducing automation using service robots in hotels of Delhi. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 2930-2937.
61. Singh, H., Unger, J., Zariffa, J., Pakosh, M., Jaglal, S., Craven, B. C., & Musselman, K. E. (2018). Robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injuries: a systematic scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(7), 704-715.
62. Tavitiyaman, P., Zhang, X., & Tsang, W. Y. (2022). How tourists perceive the usefulness of technology adoption in hotels: Interaction effect of past experience and education level. Journal of China Tourism Research, 18(1), 64-87.
63. Tinwell, A., Grimshaw, M., & Williams, A. (2010). Uncanny behavior in survival horror games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 2(1), 3-25.
64. TUBITAK (2021). Robot. Retrieved May 28, 2021, from http://www.bilimteknik.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/bilgipaket/robotik/tanimlar.html.
65. TUIK (2021). İşsizlik oranları. Retrieved December 17, 2021, from https://www.tuik.gov.tr/.
66. Tung, V. W. S., & Au, N. (2018). Exploring customer experiences with robotics in hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30, 2680-2697.
67. Tung, V. W. S., & Law, R. (2017). The potential for tourism and hospitality experience research inhuman-robot interactions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(10), 2498-2513.
68. Tuomi, A., Tussyadiah, I. P., & Stienmetz, J. (2021). Applications and implications of service robots in hospitality. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 62(2), 232-247.
69. Uğur, N. G., & Turan, A. H. (2016). Mobil uygulama kabul modeli: birölçek geliştirme çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(4), 97-126.
70. Vatan, A., & Dogan, S. (2021). What do hotel employees think about service robots? A qualitative study in Turkey. Tourism Management Perspectives, 37, 100775.
71. Wan, L. C., Chan, E. K., & Luo, X. (2021). Robots come to rescue: how to reduce perceived risk of infectiousdiseaseincovid19-strickenconsumers? Annals of Tourism Research, 88, 103069.
72. Wang, W. (2017). Smartphones as social actors? Social dispositional factors in assessing anthropomorphism. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 334-344.
73. Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Social cognition unbound: insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 58-62.
74. Wirtz, J., Patterson, P. G., Kunz, W. H., Gruber, T., Lu, V. N., Paluch, S., & Martins, A. (2018). Brave new world: service robots in the frontline. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 907-931.
75. Wu, J., Zhang, X., Zhu, Y., & Yu-Buck, G. F. (2021). Get close to the robot: the effect of risk perception of covid-19 pandemic on customer–robot engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6314.
76. Xu, S., Stienmetz, J., & Ashton, M. (2020). How will service robots redefine leadership in hotel management? Adelphi approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(6), 2217-2237.
77. Yıldız, S. (2018). Turist rehberliği mesleğinde robot rehberlerin yükselişi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 10(23), 164-177.
78. Yu, C. E. (2020). Humanlike robots as employees in the hotel industry: thematic content analysis of online reviews. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 29(1), 22-38.
79. Yu, C. E., & Ngan, H. F. B. (2019). The power of headtilts: gender and cultural differences of perceived human vs human-like robot smile in service. Tourism Review, 74(3), 428-442.
80. Yücel Altunel, H. (2003). Reklamlarda insanbiçimsellik. İletişim Araştırmaları, 1(1), 107-121.
81. Zeng, Z., Chen, P. J., & Lew, A. A. (2020). From high-touch to high-tech: covid-19 drives robotics adoption. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 724-734.
82. Zhang, Y. (2021). A big-data analysis of public perceptions of service robots amid covid-19. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), 9(1), 234-242.