Research Article

Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil

Volume: 4 Number: 2 August 31, 2026
EN TR

Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil

Abstract

This study investigated the regression analysis of tropical soil (TS) stabilised with calcium chloride salt (CCS) using the Standard Proctor Method (SPM) to assess its suitability as a pavement construction material. Laboratory tests, including Atterberg limits (liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index) and compaction parameters (maximum dry density, MDD; optimum moisture content, OMC), were conducted on both natural and stabilised soils in accordance with British Standard Light specifications. CCS was applied at concentrations ranging from 4% to 16%. Results were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression analysis. Findings indicated that increasing CCS content increased the coarseness of the lateritic soil. MDD initially decreased from 1.63 Mg/m³ (untreated) to 1.45 Mg/m³ at 4% CCS, then increased to 1.97 Mg/m³ at 16% CCS, while OMC rose from 19.47% at 4% CCS and declined progressively at higher CCS. Regression analyses confirmed significant differences across most test parameters, except for the plasticity index, which showed no variation. High coefficient values were recorded across treatments. The study concludes that CCS effectively improves the engineering properties of tropical soils and recommends close monitoring of CCS content and liquid limit parameters during pavement design for low-traffic road applications.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

The contributions of the laboratory attendants and system analysts in the Department of Civil Engineering are acknowledged.

Ethical Statement

The author(s) of this article declare that the materials and methods used in this study do not require approval from an ethics committee and/or special legal permission.

References

  1. J. Sani, P. Yohanna, and I. Chukwujama, “Effect of rice husk ash admixed with treated sisal fibre on properties of lateritic soil as a road construction material”, J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2020.
  2. A. Musa and M. M. Alhaji, “Utilization of Rice Husk Ash for Improvement of Deficient Soils in Nigeria: A Review”, 2017.
  3. K. Ishola, T. Ijimdiya, P. Yohanna, and K. Osinubi, “Evaluation of shear strength of compacted iron ore tailings treated lateritic soil”, Platf. J. Eng., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 48–58, 2020.
  4. J. Oluremi and K. Ishola, “Compaction and strength characteristics of lead contaminated lateritic soil treated with eco-friendly biopolymer for use as road foundation material”, Hybrid Adv., vol. 5, p. 100158, 2024, Doi: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100158.
  5. J. R. Oluremi, R. Siddique, and E. P. Adeboje, “Stabilization potential of cement kiln dust treated lateritic soil”, Int. J. Eng. Res. Afr., vol. 23, pp. 52–63, 2016.
  6. J. E. Sani, R. K. Etim, and A. Joseph, “Compaction behaviour of lateritic soil–calcium chloride mixtures”, Geotech. Geol. Eng., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2343–2362, 2019, Doi: 10.1007/s10706- 018-00760-6.
  7. M. Gidigasu, Laterite soil engineering: pedogenesis and engineering principles, vol. 9. Elsevier, 2012.
  8. R. K. Etim, D. U. Ekpo, G. E. Udofia, and I. C. Attah, “Evaluation of lateritic soil stabilized with lime and periwinkle shell ash (PSA) admixture bound for sustainable road materials”, Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 62, 2022, Doi: 10.1007/s41062-021-00665-z.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Civil Geotechnical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 31, 2026

Submission Date

April 24, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 12, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 4 Number: 2

APA
Ishola, K., Adeyemo, K., Kareem, M., Fadipe, O. O., & Ameen, I. O. (2026). Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil. Alpha Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.70988/ajeas.1936384
AMA
1.Ishola K, Adeyemo K, Kareem M, Fadipe OO, Ameen IO. Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil. AJEAS. 2026;4(2):49-63. doi:10.70988/ajeas.1936384
Chicago
Ishola, Kazeem, Kazeem Adeyemo, Mutiu Kareem, Olusola Olayemi Fadipe, and Ifedolapo Omowumi Ameen. 2026. “Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil”. Alpha Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 4 (2): 49-63. https://doi.org/10.70988/ajeas.1936384.
EndNote
Ishola K, Adeyemo K, Kareem M, Fadipe OO, Ameen IO (August 1, 2026) Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil. Alpha Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 4 2 49–63.
IEEE
[1]K. Ishola, K. Adeyemo, M. Kareem, O. O. Fadipe, and I. O. Ameen, “Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil”, AJEAS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49–63, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.70988/ajeas.1936384.
ISNAD
Ishola, Kazeem - Adeyemo, Kazeem - Kareem, Mutiu - Fadipe, Olusola Olayemi - Ameen, Ifedolapo Omowumi. “Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil”. Alpha Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 4/2 (August 1, 2026): 49-63. https://doi.org/10.70988/ajeas.1936384.
JAMA
1.Ishola K, Adeyemo K, Kareem M, Fadipe OO, Ameen IO. Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil. AJEAS. 2026;4:49–63.
MLA
Ishola, Kazeem, et al. “Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil”. Alpha Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, Aug. 2026, pp. 49-63, doi:10.70988/ajeas.1936384.
Vancouver
1.Kazeem Ishola, Kazeem Adeyemo, Mutiu Kareem, Olusola Olayemi Fadipe, Ifedolapo Omowumi Ameen. Regression Analysis of the Standard Proctor Test on Chemically Treated Tropical Soil. AJEAS. 2026 Aug. 1;4(2):49-63. doi:10.70988/ajeas.1936384

Alpha Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences © 2023 is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY)