Research Article

EXAMINING THE LATITUDINAL VARIATION OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ LEARNING STYLE PROFILES

Volume: 4 Number: 1 June 30, 2016
TR EN

EXAMINING THE LATITUDINAL VARIATION OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ LEARNING STYLE PROFILES

Öz

The idea of learning styles being an important factor over the achievement of the students has recently gained popularity. However, the results of both domestic and foreign studies that have investigated the learning styles in terms of various variables are quite different from each other, yielding that there is no consistency in the literature. This descriptive study aims to determine the latitudinal variation of the learning styles of the pre-service teachers and examine the learning style profiles with regard to various variables. The data were collected from 366 undergraduate students who are enrolled at the Faculty of Education in a state university in western region of Black sea. In order to collect data, “Kolb Learning Style Inventory” and “Personal Information Form” have been used. Research data were analysed by using frequency, percentage, crosstabs and Chi-square test. In order to measure the magnitude of the effect that is found by chi-square test, Phi Cramer’s V test was applied. The findings revealed that 56.8% of pre-service teachers have dominant learning styles as diverger; 28.1% of them as assimilator; 11.5% of them as accomodator and 3.6% of them as converger. Moreover, it has been found that there is a weak but statistically significant relationship between pre-service teachers’ grade levels and learning styles. The study also indicated that the department, gender, parental schooling, field tendencies and daily study time have no significant effects on the learning style preferences of pre-service teachers. This study adds to the literature in that it questions consistency among the previous results of the studies. It may be suggested that new studies may be conducted using more variables to reveal different relationships and different data collection tools such as qualitative ones to shed light on these relationships. Furthermore, the practitioners may take into consideration the learning styles of the students, especially in different grade levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

  1. Açışlı, S. (2016). Investigation of Class Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles and Critical Thinking Dispositions. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 273-285.
  2. Al-Qahtani, D. A., & Al-Gahtani, S. M. (2014). Assessing learning styles of Saudi dental students using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory. Journal of Dental Education, 78(6), 927-933.
  3. Altun, F. (2015). Music Teacher Candidates’ Learning Styles, Problem Solving Skills And The Relationship Between Field Achievement Points (Masters Thesis). Inonu University Institude of Education Sciences, Malatya.
  4. Aşkar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Education and Science, 17(87), 37-47.
  5. Boyle, G. J. (1995). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some psychometric limitations. Australian Psychologist, 30, 71-74.
  6. Brunton, B. (2015). Learning Styles and Student Performance in Introductory Economics. Journal of Education for Business, 90(2), 89-95.
  7. Buaraphan, K. (2015). Grades 1-12 Thai students’ learning styles according to Kolb’s Model. Asian Social Science, 11(10), 186-201.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal Bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: Istatistik, araştırma deseni, spss uygulamaları ve yorum. Ankara: Pegem Akademi

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2016

Submission Date

September 28, 2017

Acceptance Date

May 30, 2016

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 4 Number: 1

APA
Kırcaburun, K., & Danişman, Ş. (2016). EXAMINING THE LATITUDINAL VARIATION OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ LEARNING STYLE PROFILES. Asian Journal of Instruction (E-AJI), 4(1), 45-58. https://izlik.org/JA94WX44NS