Research Article

Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey

Volume: 13 Number: 1 January 24, 2024
EN

Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey

Abstract

This study aims to present a critical portrayal of teaching geopolitics at Turkish universities by assessing both undergraduate and graduate levels of Political Science and International Relations (IR) curricula. Geopolitical analysis has gone through several phases and traditions by conceiving space as a crucial element for representing world politics. In addition to interstate rivalries, geopolitics also refers to many conflicts and rivalries within an intrastate framework in the context of multiple territorial scales. While geopolitics seems to be falsely perceived as something equal to a state-centric and hard realist academic subfield under a strong military tutelage in Turkey, it lacks a broad multi-level analysis, as well as geographical and historical reasoning. In this study, I propose to consider cartography, territoriality, and geopolitical representations, which form the basis of contemporary geopolitical analysis. The article evaluates weekly schedules, learning outcomes, content, and objectives of the courses available on the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) information packages on university websites. Based on a qualitative case study, it eventually aims to improve the methodological character of geopolitics teaching, indirectly influencing the level and quality of geopolitics in Turkey.

Keywords

References

  1. Boniface, Pascal. La Géopolitique [Geopolitics]. Paris: Eyrolles, 2017.
  2. Claval, Paul. “Hérodote and the French Left.” In Geopolitical Traditions. A century of geopolitical thought, edited by Klaus Dodds and David Atkinson, 239-267. New York: Routledge, 2000.
  3. Cohen, Saul B. Geopolitics, The Geography of International Relations. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.
  4. Defay, Alexandre. Jeopolitik [Geopolitics]. Ankara: Dost Yayınevi, 2005.
  5. Desforges, Alix, Barbara Loyer, Jérémie Rocques, Joséphine Boucher, Julie Mathelin and Pierre Verluise. “Existe-t-il une méthode géopolitique?” [Is there a geopolitical method?]. Diploweb.com: la revue géopolitique (2019, 19 October). Accessed March 30, 2022, https://www.diploweb.com/Video-B-Loyer-Existe-t-il-une-methode-geopolitique.html
  6. Deslauriers, Jean-Pierre, Recherche qualitative. Guide pratique [Qualitative research. Practical Guide]. Montréal: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
  7. Dodds, Klaus and David Atkinson. Preface to Geopolitical Traditions. A century of geopolitical thought, edited by Klaus Dodds and David Atkinson, xiv-xvi. New York: Routledge, 2000.
  8. Dodds, Klaus. Geopolitics. A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

International Relations Theories, International Relations (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

January 16, 2024

Publication Date

January 24, 2024

Submission Date

May 7, 2023

Acceptance Date

September 13, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 13 Number: 1

APA
Savaş, C. (2024). Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 13(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1413453
AMA
1.Savaş C. Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace. 2024;13(1):1-17. doi:10.20991/allazimuth.1413453
Chicago
Savaş, Cem. 2024. “Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey”. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 13 (1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1413453.
EndNote
Savaş C (January 1, 2024) Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 13 1 1–17.
IEEE
[1]C. Savaş, “Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey”, All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.20991/allazimuth.1413453.
ISNAD
Savaş, Cem. “Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey”. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 13/1 (January 1, 2024): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1413453.
JAMA
1.Savaş C. Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace. 2024;13:1–17.
MLA
Savaş, Cem. “Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey”. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 1-17, doi:10.20991/allazimuth.1413453.
Vancouver
1.Cem Savaş. Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace. 2024 Jan. 1;13(1):1-17. doi:10.20991/allazimuth.1413453

Cited By

Manuscripts submitted for consideration must follow the style on the journal’s web page.The manuscripts should not be submitted simultaneously to any other publication, nor may they have been previously published elsewhere in English. However, articles that are published previously in another language but updated or improved can be submitted. For such articles, the author(s) will be responsible in seeking the required permission for copyright. Manuscripts may be submitted via Submission Form found at: http://www.allazimuth.com/authors-guideline/. For any questions please contact: allazimuth@bilkent.edu.tr