Perception and Continuity: Active Non-Alignment in Turkish Foreign Policy

Year 2026, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 93 - 112, 29.01.2026

Burak Çakırca

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1822217

https://izlik.org/JA79CA33ME

Abstract

This study analyses Turkish foreign policy between 2010 and 2025, asking whether this period marks a strategic rupture or reflects continuity with the longstanding Westernisation trajectory. Employing the emerging framework of Active Non-Alignment (ANA), the study examines how Turkey’s redefinition of strategic interests and alignments reflects shifting global and regional dynamics. The findings suggest that while institutional and ontological ties to the West persist, Turkish foreign policy demonstrates a perceptual shift characterised by strategic autonomy, diversified partnerships, and issue-based pragmatism. By applying ANA to this evolving policy orientation, the study offers both a reinterpretation of Turkish foreign policy continuity and a theoretical contribution to the emerging literature on alternative alignment strategies in global politics.

Keywords

Active Non-Alignment , Turkish foreign policy , continuity , Westernisation

References

• Acharya, A. (2018). Constructing global order: Agency and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
• Active nonalignment: The Global South’s new foreign policy in the face of the Ukraine war. (2023, June 19). The Week.https://theweek.com/news/world-news/961332/active- nonalignment-the-global-souths-new-foreign-policy-in-face-of-ukraine
• Adısönmez, U. C., & Oztığ, L. I. (2024). A psychoanalytic approach to Turkish foreign policy: Crisis, disorder, and disorientation. Critical Studies on Security, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2024.2312316
• Akkoyunlu, K. (2021). The five phases of Turkey’s foreign policy under the AKP. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 88(2). https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2021.0014
• Aktürk, Ş. (2015). The fourth style of politics: Eurasianism as a pro-Russian rethinking of Turkey’s geopolitical identity. Turkish Studies, 16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2015.1021246
• Aktürk, Ş. (2021). Turkey’s grand strategy and the great powers. Insight Turkey.
• Al Jazeera. (2017, March 25). Fikri Işık: NATO countries could’ve been more frank. https://www.aljazeera.com/program/talk-to-al-jazeera/2017/3/25/fikri-isik-nato- countries-couldve-been-more-frank
• Al Jazeera. (2020, December 14). US sanctions NATO ally Turkey over Russian S-400 defence missiles. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/12/14/us-sanctions-nato-ally- turkey-over-russian-missile-defence
• Altunışık, M. B. (2014). Turkey as an ‘emerging donor’ and the Arab uprisings. Mediterranean Politics, 19(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2014.959761
• Altunışık, M. B. (2020). The new turn in Turkey’s foreign policy in the Middle East: Regional and domestic insecurities. Istituto Affari Internazionali. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep29462
• Amorim, C. (2023). Brazil and the Global South. In Latin American foreign policies in the new world order: The active non-alignment option (pp. 251–261). Anthem Press.
• Anadolu Ajansı. (2024a, June 27). Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Avrupa Birliği’ne tam üyelik stratejik hedefimizdir. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/cumhurbaskani-erdogan- avrupa-birligine-tam-uyelik-stratejik-hedefimizdir/3259990
• Anadolu Ajansı. (2024b, October 15). Savunmadaki “milli hamle” Türkiye’ye kazandırdı. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/savunma-sanayisi/savunmadaki-milli-hamle-turkiyeye- kazandirdi/3362358
• Armijo, L. E. (2023). Latin American foreign policies in an era of transition. In Latin American foreign policies in the new world order: The active non-alignment option (pp. 73–83). Anthem Press. Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2018). Foreign policy and identity change: Analysing perceptions of Europe among the Turkish public. Politics, 38(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395717729932
• Basu, K. (2024, January 9). Is India refusing to lead active non-alignment? The New Indian Express.https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2024/Jan/09/is-india-refusing- to-lead-active-non-alignment-2649494.html
• BBC News Türkçe. (2024, June 25). Türkiye BRICS üyeliği konusunda hangi mesajları veriyor? https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/ceqqdn6dwpdo
• BBC News Türkçe. (2025, June 12). Türkiye silah ihracatında nasıl güçlendi? https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/cy8nv87klpko
• Bilgin, P. (2009). Securing Turkey through western-oriented foreign policy. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600005239
• Cağaptay, S. (2009, October 26). Is Turkey leaving the West? Foreign Affairs.https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/turkey/2009-10-26/turkey-leaving- west
• Çakırca, B. (2024). İnsani diplomasinin somut bir örneği olarak Tahıl Koridoru Anlaşması ve yükselen bir insani diplomasi aktörü olarak Türkiye. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(3), 936–958. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1404873
• Çavuşoğlu, M. (2019, August 5). 11. Büyükelçiler Konferansı açılış konuşması. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/BAKAN/bkon2019.pdf
• Çavuşoğlu, M. (2020, November 10). 12. Büyükelçiler Konferansı’nda yapılan konuşma. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/sayin-bakanimizin-buyukelciler-konferansinda-yaptigi- konusma.tr.mfa
• Çavuşoğlu, M. (2022a, August 8). 13. Büyükelçiler Konferansı açılış hitabı. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sayin-mevlut-cavusoglu-nun-xiii- buyukelciler-konferansi-acilis-hitabi-8-8-2022.tr.mfa
• Çavuşoğlu, M. (2022b, August 13). Büyükelçiler Konferansı açılış konuşması. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/BAKAN/sayin-bakanimizin-acilis-konusmasi-bkon.pdf
• Cook, S. A. (2018, August 17). We wanted Turkey to be a partner: It was never going to work. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/blog/we-wanted-turkey-be- partner-it-was-never-going-work
• D. K. Giri. (2023, March 11). Active non-alignment. The Arunachal Times.https://arunachaltimes.in/index.php/2023/03/11/active-non-alignment/
• Duran, B., & İnat, K. (2023). Turkish foreign policy in the face of regional and global challenges. Insight Turkey.
• Dursun-Özkanca, O. (2019). Turkey–West relations: The politics of intra-alliance opposition. Cambridge University Press.
• EKOTÜRK. (2025, January 25). Türkiye’den tarihi başarı: 50’den fazla ülkeye 770 SİHA ihraç edildi. https://www.ekoturk.com/haberler/turkiyeden-tarihi-basari-50den-fazla- ulkeye-770-siha-ihrac-edildi/
• Fidan, H. (2023a). Turkish foreign policy at the turn of the ‘Century of Türkiye’: Challenges, vision, objectives, and transformation. Insight Turkey, 25, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2023253.1
• Fidan, H. (2023b, August 7). 14. Büyükelçiler Konferansı açılış konuşması. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/disisleri-bakani-sayin-hakan-fidan-in-14-buyukelciler- konferansi-acilisinda-yaptigi-konusma--7-agustos-2023.tr.mfa
• Flight Global. (2024, November 28). Turkey drops plan to purchase F-16 Block 70 upgrade kits, opting for domestic improvement work. https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed- wing/turkey-drops-plan-to-purchase-f-16-block-70-upgrade-kits-opting-for-domestic- improvement-work/160908.article
• Fortín, C., Heine, J., & Ominami, C. (2020). Latin America between a rock and a hard place: A second Cold War and the active non-alignment option. Global Policy.
• Fortín, C., Heine, J., & Ominami, C. (2023a). Conclusions: Implications of an active non- alignment. In Latin American foreign policies in the new world order: The active non- alignment option (pp. 263–273). Anthem Press.
• Fortín, C., Heine, J., & Ominami, C. (2023b). Introduction: Active non-alignment as a doctrine. In Latin American foreign policies in the new world order: The active non- alignment option (pp. 1–14). Anthem Press.
• G20 Rio de Janeiro Leaders’ Declaration. (2025, February 3). https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/11/19/g20-rio-de- janeiro-leaders-declaration/
• Hacaoğlu, S., & Kozok, F. (2024, September 2). Turkey bids to join BRICS as Erdoğan pushes for new alliances beyond the West. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-09-02/turkey-submits-bid-to-join- brics-as-erdogan-pushes-for-new-alliances-beyond-west
• Hatipoğlu, E., & Palmer, G. (2014). Contextualizing change in Turkish foreign policy: The promise of the ‘two-good’ theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.888538
• Heine, J. (2022, August 14). Un no alineamiento activo. Clarín. https://www.clarin.com/opinion/alineamiento-activo_0_XKHw61X7nK.html
• Heine, J. (2024, January 31). Active non-alignment in a changing world. The New Indian Express.https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2024/Jan/31/active-non- alignment-in-a-changing-world
• İletişim Başkanlığı. (2023, November 21). Türk dronlarının küresel satışlarında artış. https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/turkce/dis_basinda_turkiye/detay/turk-dronlarinin-kuresel- satislarinda-artis/
• İletişim Başkanlığı. (2024, November 27). Türkiye, milyarlarca dolar tasarruf edecek: F- 16’larını ABD olmadan modernize ediyor. https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/turkce/dis_basinda_turkiye/detay/turkiye-milyarlarca- dolar-tasarruf-edecek-f-16larini-abd-olmadan-modernize-ediyor/
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7– 23.
• Kutlay, M. (2024, September 20). Why does Turkey want to join BRICS – and what will the trade-offs be? EUROPP.https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2024/09/20/why-does- turkey-want-to-join-brics-and-what-will-the-trade-offs-be/
• Kutlay, M., & Karaoğuz, H. E. (2023). Development and foreign policy in Turkey: Rethinking interconnectedness in a multipolar world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 031-12116-6
• Kutlay, M., & Öniş, Z. (2021). Turkish foreign policy in a post-Western order: Strategic autonomy or new forms of dependence? International Affairs, 97(4), 1085–1104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab094
• Larrabee, F. S. (2011). The “New Turkey” and American–Turkish relations. Insight Turkey.
• Lesser, I. (2025, January 5). Turkey and the West: A relationship unmoored? German Marshall Fund of the United States.https://www.gmfus.org/news/turkey-and-west- relationship-unmoored
• Müftüler-Baç, M. (2021). Turkey’s grand strategy in the context of global and regional challenges. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 25(2). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/perception/issue/59437/853771
• Niblett, R. (2024). The new Cold War: How will the contest between the US and China shape our century? Atlantic Books.
• Öniş, Z., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2009). Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign policy activism in Turkey during the AKP era. Turkish Studies, 10(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840802648562 Öztürk, B. (2024). Türkiye İsveç’in NATO üyeliğini neden onayladı? SETA. https://www.setav.org/yorum/turkiye-isvecin-nato-uyeligini-neden-onayladi
• Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2019). Asia Anew Initiative. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/asia-anew-initiative.en.mfa
• Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2022). National foreign policy in the “Century of Türkiye.”https://www.mfa.gov.tr/synopsis-of-the-turkish-foreign- policy.en.mfa Reuters. (2023, April 5). Why are Turkey and Hungary against Sweden joining NATO? https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/after-finland-joins-nato-why-is-turkey-making- sweden-wait-2023-04-04/
• Rodrigues, J. H. T. (2024, September 24). Brazil is Ukraine’s best bet for peace. Foreign Policy.https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/05/02/brazil-russia-ukraine-war-lula- diplomacy-active-nonalignment/
• Rumelili, B. (2024). Foreign policy in the age of anxiety: An existentialist perspective on post-2016 Turkish foreign policy. In A. N. Yurdusev & M. Doğrul (Eds.), Global transformations and Türkiye (pp. 257–268). Turkish Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.53478/TUBA.978-625-6110-04-5.ch14
• Sarı, B., & Sula, İ. E. (2024). Turkish foreign policy in a transforming world order: Middle power strategies and prospects. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 29(1).
• Serbin, A. (2023). The resurgence of Eurasia and Latin America. In Latin American foreign policies in the new world order: The active non-alignment option (pp. 101–111). Anthem Press.
• Seth, O. (2023, July 18). The AIIB’s 10 biggest beneficiaries. https://www.fdiintelligence.com/content/data-trends/the-aiibs-10-biggest- beneficiaries-82718
• Stephen, M. D. (2014). States, norms and power: Emerging powers and global order. Millennium, 42(3), 888–896.
• Stuenkel, O. D. C. (2023). Latin America in the post-Western world. In Latin American foreign policies in the new world order: The active non-alignment option (pp. 123– 131). Anthem Press. T.C. Dışişleri Bakanlığı. (2022, February 24). No: 62, Rusya Federasyonu tarafından Ukrayna’ya yönelik başlatılan askeri operasyon hk. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-62_- rusya-federasyonu-tarafindan-ukrayna-ya-yonelik-baslatilan-askeri-operasyon- hk.tr.mfa
• T.C. Dışişleri Bakanlığı. (2024, March 16). No: 44, Kırım’ın yasadışı ilhakının onuncu yıldönümü hk. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-44_-kirim-in-yasadisi-ilhakinin-onuncu- yildonumu-hk.tr.mfa
• T.C. Millî Savunma Bakanlığı. (2019, July 12). S-400 uzun menzilli bölge hava ve füze savunma sisteminin intikali. https://www.msb.gov.tr/SlaytHaber/1272019-78857
• T.C. Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2025, February 6). Uzak Ülkeler Stratejisi. https://ticaret.gov.tr/ihracat/uzak-ulkeler-stratejisi
• Tokatlian, J. G. (2023). The state of US–Latin American relations: The case for a diplomacy of equidistance. In Latin American foreign policies in the new world order: The active non-alignment option (pp. 33–48). Anthem Press.
• Tussie, D. (2023). The promise of active non-alignment and its intersection with post- hegemonic regionalism. In Latin American foreign policies in the new world order: The active non-alignment option (pp. 201–213). Anthem Press.
• United Nations. (2023). Black Sea Grain Initiative data. https://www.un.org/en/black-sea- grain-initiative/data
• Wemer, D. (2018, July 11). NATO ministers preach unity, but divisions persist. Atlantic Council.https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/framing-the-debate- nato-engages/
• World Development Indicators. (2024). DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
• Yalvaç, F. (2012). Strategic depth or hegemonic depth? A critical realist analysis of Turkey’s position in the world system. International Relations, 26(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117811428331
• YASED. (2024). Rakamlarla uluslararası doğrudan yatırımlar. https://yased- api.yased.org.tr/Uploads/Reports/YASED-Rakamlarla-UDY-Haziran-2024.pdf
• Yeşiltaş, M. (2024, June 14). Türkiye’s strategic bid for BRICS membership. Daily Sabah.https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/turkiyes-strategic-bid-for-brics-membership
• Yeşiltaş, M., & Pirinççi, F. (2021). Turkey’s strategic conduct under the changing international system. Insight Turkey, 23(4), 119–146.