Conceptualizing Compartmentalization in International Relations: The Case Of Turkish Foreign Policy

Year 2026, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 71 - 92, 29.01.2026

Şaban Kardaş , Bayram Sinkaya

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1830022

https://izlik.org/JA89FR48TN

Abstract

How do we conceptualize compartmentalization as a foreign policy behavior? This paper will argue that compartmentalization is a practical and cognitive approach to foreign policy decision-making and behavior at times of contradictory pressures arising from domestic or external realities, when actors need to make stark choices between different alternatives. Having delineated the boundaries of this concept, the article will engage in an extensive review of the literature employing the concept of compartmentalization in the study of Turkish foreign policy. It will trace how Turkish foreign policy conduct increasingly adopted this behavior in at least two distinct forms: issue-based and actor-based. The paper will argue that the widening scope of this practical-cognitive behavior is a result of a number of systemic and domestic-state level factors, which are closely related to the evolution of Türkiye’s domestic realities and international positioning against the background of a changing international system. Moreover, the paper will argue that at the individual-ideational level as well, compartmentalization has been part of a set of cognitive priors which affect the Turkish foreign policy makers’ formulation of alternative foreign policy strategies.

Keywords

Compartmentalization , Turkish foreign policy , cooperation , foreign policy analysis

References

• Acharya, A. (2009). Whose ideas matter? Agency and power in Asian regionalism. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
• Acharya, A. (2012). Ideas, norms, and regional orders. In T.V. Paul (Ed). International Relations theory and regional transformation (pp. 183-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• AK Parti. (2022, April 20). Genel Başkanımız ve Cumhurbaşkanımız Erdoğan, TBMM Grup Toplantımızda konuştu. Retrieved from https://akparti.org.tr/haberler/genel-baskanimiz-vecumhurbaskanimiz- erdogan-tbmm-grup-toplantimizda-konustu-20042022-141219/
• Akbarzadeh, S. (2024, April 19). Iran and the nuclear agreement: What lies ahead? Middle East Council on Global Affairs. Retrieved from https://mecouncil.org/publication_chapters/iran-and-the-nuclearagreement- what-lies-ahead/
• Altunışık, M. (2024). Turkey’s foreign policy toward Israel: Co-existing of ideology and pragmatism in the age of global and regional shifts. International Politics, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311- 024-00619-z
• Aran, A., & Kutlay, M. (2024). Turkey’s quest for strategic autonomy in an era of multipolarity. IPC Policy Brief, 1-18.
• Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226-254.
• Aydin, M. (1999). Determinants of Turkish foreign policy: historical framework and traditional inputs. Middle Eastern Studies, 35(4), 152-186.
• Aybet, G. (2006). Turkey and the EU after the first year of negotiations: Reconciling internal and external policy challenges. Security Dialogue, 37(4), 529-549.
• Aydinli, E., & Rosenau, J. N. (Ed.). (2005). Globalization, security, and the nation state: Paradigms in transition. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• Balta, E., & Özkan, B. (2016). Türkiye-Rusya ilişkilerine “tarih” ile bakmak. (Boğaziçi Üniversitesi - TÜSİAD Dış Politika Forumu). Retrieved from https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/10005- turkiye-rusya-iliskilerine-tarih-ile-bakmak
• Balta, E. (2019). From geopolitical competition to strategic partnership: Turkey and Russia after The Cold War. Journal of International Relations, 16(63), 69–86.
• Balta, E., & Bal, H. B. (2025). How do middle powers act? Turkey’s foreign policy and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. International Politics, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-025-00679-9
• Bayraktar, O. (2024). Turkey’s balancing act: The compartmentalization of security and economics. 1945-1980 [PhD Dissertation]. Bilkent University.
• Berker, M. (2024, January 24). President Erdogan stresses cooperation between Türkiye and Iran to promote development, stability in region. AA. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middleeast/ president-erdogan-stresses-turkiye-iran-cooperation-to-promote-development-stability-inregion/ 3117906
• Bilgin, P. (2009). Securing Turkey through western-oriented foreign policy. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 103-123.
• Brugier, C. (2024). Institutionalization, compartmentalization and “privatization” of conflicts: The driving forces behind EU-China relations, the world’s largest trading relationship. In J. F. Sabouret (Ed.). L’Asie-Monde–III: Chroniques sur l’Asie et le Pacifique (2014-2023). CNRS Éditions via OpenEdition.
• Buzan, B. & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cafiero, G., & Viela, B. (2017). China-Turkey relations grow despite differences over Uighurs. Middle East Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mei.edu/publications/china-turkey-relations-growdespite- differences-over-uighurs
• Cagaptay, S. (2016). Turkey’s rewarming ties with Iran. Washington Institute. Retrieved from https:// www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/turkeys-rewarming-ties-iran
• Choiruzzad, S. A. B. (2017). ASEAN as compartmentalized regionalism: A preliminary discussion. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 19(1), 44-57.
• Clifford, J. G. (1990). Bureaucratic politics. The Journal of American History, 77(1), 161-168.
• CNN Türk. (2012, January 7). “İran’la gizli bir savaşımız yok.” Retrieved from https://www.cnnturk. com/turkiye/iranla-gizli-bir-savasimiz-yok-80487
• Coffey, L., & Kasapoğlu, C. (2023). A new Black Sea strategy for a new Black Sea reality. Hudson Institute, 1-14.
• Cornell, S. E. (2016). The Fallacy of ‘compartmentalisation’: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria. European View, 15(1), 97-109.
• Çelikpala, M. (2019). Viewing present as history: The state and future of Turkey-Russia relations. EDAM Foreign Policy & Security, 6, 1-30.
• Davutoğlu, A. (2008). Turkey’s foreign policy vision: An assessment of 2007. Insight Turkey, 10(1), 77-96.
• Davutoğlu, A. (2009). Turkish foreign policy and the EU in 2010. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 8(3), 11- 17.
• Davutoğlu, A. (2013, March 21). Zero Problems in a New Era. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://www.mfa.gov.tr/article-by-h_e_-mr_-ahmet-davutoglu_-minister-of-foreign-affairs-of-therepublic- of-turkey-published-in-foreign-policy-magazin-2.en.mfa
• Délano, A. (2009). From limited to active engagement: Mexico’s emigration policies from a foreign policy perspective (2000-2006). International Migration Review, 43(4), 764-814.
• Delreux, T., & Earsom, J. (2024). Missed opportunities: The impact of internal compartmentalisation on EU diplomacy across the international regime complex on climate change. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(9), 2960-2985.
• Demiryol, T. (2018). Türkiye-Rusya ilişkilerinde enerjinin rolü: Asimetrik karşılıklı bağımlılık ve sınırları. GAUN JSS, 17 (4), 1438-1455.
• Ekathimerini. (2023, November 13). Athens ‘totally’ disagrees with Ankara on Hamas but talks should proceed, says PM. Retrieved from https://www.ekathimerini.com/news/1224789/athens-totally19 Conceptualizing compartmentalization in international relations... disagrees-with-ankara-on-hamas-but-talks-should-proceed-says-pm/
• Erbay, N.Ö. (2021, June 24). Ankara to use compartmentalization in managing relations. Daily Sabah. Retrieved from https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/news-analysis/ankara-to-usecompartmentalization- in-managing-relations
• Ergin, S. (2020, December 29). 2020’den 2021’e dış politika (1) Rusya ile rekabet, çatışma ve işbirliği el ele yürüyor. Hürriyet. Retrieved from https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/sedat-ergin/2020den- 2021e-dis-politika-1-rusya-ile-rekabet-catisma-ve-isbirligi-el-ele-yuruyor-41700719
• Erşen, E. (2017). 2000’li yıllarda Türkiye-Rusya ilişkileri: Kompartımanlaştırma stratejisinin sorunları. In G. Özcan, E. Balta, & B. Beşgül (Eds.). Türkiye ve Rusya ilişkilerinde değişen dinamikler: Kuşku ile komşuluk (pp.147-161). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Fearon, J. D. (1998). Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization, 52(2), 269-305.
• Frappi, C. (2018). The Russo-Turkish entente: A tactical embrace along strategic and geopolitical convergences. In V. Talbot (Ed.). Turkey: Towards a Eurasian shift? (pp. 45-69). Milano: ISPI.
• Giannotta, V. (2022). The domino effect: What is Turkey’s stake in the Black Sea crisis? Trends Research & Advisory. Retrieved from https://trendsresearch.org/insight/the-domino-effect-whatis- turkeys-stake-in-the-black-sea-crisis/?srsltid=AfmBOooHnxrID3mw_OXl8AYg5BDuDOk5SG wHSbJuHu8Iwlpp8xi_XfsI
• Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (Eds.). (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca&London: Cornell University Press.
• Gümüş, A. (2022). Increasing realism in Turkish foreign policy during post-Davutoğlu era. Insight Turkey, 24(4), 167-186.
• Haberler.com. (2016, April 16). Erdoğan: İran ile Türkiye arasındaki iş hacmi artırılacak. Retrieved from https://www.haberler.com/ekonomi/erdogan-iran-ile-turkiye-arasindaki-is-hacmi-8363333- haberi/
• Hale, W. (1992). Turkey, the Middle East and the Gulf crisis. International Affairs, 68(4), 679-692.
• Hamilton, R. E., & Mikulska, A. (2021). Cooperation, competition, and compartmentalization: Russian- Turkish relations and their implications for the West. Foreign Policy Research Institute, 1528. Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2020, August 9). Dr. Rouhani at the opening ceremony of the sixth meeting of the High-Level Cooperation Council: Iran-Turkey Ties have historically been based on very strong foundations. Retrieved from https://en.mfa.ir/portal/newsview/609564/Iran-Turkeyties- have-historically-been-based-on-very-strong-foundations
• Isachenko, D. (2021). Turkey and Russia: The logic of conictual cooperation. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
• Jones, D. (2018, June 29). Turkey’s re-elected leader eyes less tension with NATO. VOA. Retrieved from https://www.voanews.com/a/turkeys-reelected-leader-eyes-easing-tensions-nato-allies/4460599. html
• Kamel, A. (1975). Turkey’s relations with the Arab world. Foreign Policy, 4(4), 91-108.
• Kang, W., & Kim, J. (2017). Compartmentalized hedging in the Middle East: Turkey’s alternative strategy towards Iran. Korean Political Science Review, 51(6), 53-74.
• Karaosmanoğlu, A. L. (2000). The evolution of the national security culture and the military in Turkey. Journal of International Affairs, 54(1). 199-216.
• Kardaş, Ş. (2006). Turkey and the Iraqi crisis: JDP between identity and interest. In H. Yavuz (Ed.). The Emergence of a new Turkey: Democracy and the AK Parti, (pp. 306–330). Utah: University of Utah Press.
• Kardaş, Ş. (2011). Quest for strategic autonomy continues, or how to make sense of Turkey’s ‘New Wave’. GMF On Turkey.
• Kardaş, Ş. (2012). Turkey-Russia energy relations: The limits of forging cooperation through economic interdependence. International Journal, 67(1), 81-100.
• Kardaş, Ş. (2013). Turkey: A regional power facing a changing international system. Turkish Studies, 14(4), 637-660.
• Kardaş, Ş. (2019). Turkey’s S400 vs. F35 conundrum and its deepening strategic partnership with Russia. GMF on Turkey.
• Kardaş, Ş., & Ünlühisarcıklı, Ö. (2021). Dual Framework for the Turkey-US Security Relationship. German Marshall Fund of the United States.
• Kardaş, Ş., Sinkaya, B., & Pehlivantürk, B. (2025). Scope, drivers and manifestations of the realist turn in Turkish foreign policy: A case of delayed strategic adjustment. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 25(1), 11-30.
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). Boston: Longman.
• Kırdemir, B. (2014, August 2). Can Turkey continue to compartmentalize its relations with Tehran? SLD. Retrieved from https://sldinfo.com/2014/02/can-turkey-continue-to-compartmentalizeits- relations-with-tehran/
• Kirişçi, K. (2009). The transformation of Turkish foreign policy: The rise of the trading state. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 29-56.
• Kostidis, M. (2023, December 2). Erdogan: ‘We will approach Athens with a win-win mindset’. Ekathimerini. Retrieved from https://www.ekathimerini.com/news/1226264/erdogan-we-willapproach- athens-with-a-win-win-mindset/
• Köremezli, İ. (2021). Turkey’s foreign policy toward Russia: Constructing a strategic partner out of a geopolitical rival. Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri Dergisi, 21(2), 351-373.
• Köstem, S. (2017). Türkiye-Rusya ilişkilerinde karşılıklı bağımlılığı yeniden düşünmek (Türkiye-Rusya İlişkileri Türkiye’nin Dış İlişkilerinin Son On Yılı Panel Serisi-7). ULİSA Analiz.
• Kuik, C. C., & Rozman, G (2015). Introduction to light or heavy hedging: Positioning between China and the United States. In G. Rozman (Ed.). Joint US-Korea Academic Studies (pp.1-9). Washington DC: Korea Economic Institute of America.
• Kundnani, H., & Puglierin, J. (2018). Atlanticist and ‘Post-Atlanticist’ wishful thinking. GMF Policy Essay, 1(6).
• Kut, G. (2010). Türk dış politikasında çok yönlülüğün yakın tarihi: Soğuk Savaş sonrası devamlılık ve değişim. Retrieved from https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/10011-turk-dis-politikasindacok- yonlulugun-yakin-tarihi-soguk-savas-sonrasi-devamlilik-ve-degisim
• Melvin, J. (2021, March 2). CERAWEEK: Kerry confident US can compartmentalize, work with China on climate. Retrieved from https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/ latest-news/electric-power/030221-ceraweek-kerry-confident-us-can-compartmentalize-workwith- china-on-climate
• Middle East Eye. (2021, February 20). Turkey’s Erdogan seeks “win-win” relationship with US. Retrieved from https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/turkeys-erdogan-seeks-win-relationship-usbiden
• Milner, H. (1992). International theories of cooperation among nations: Strengths and weaknesses. World Politics, 44(3), 466-496.
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2014, January 30). Prime Minister Erdoğan pays a visit to Iran. Retrieved from https://www.mfa.gov.tr/prime-minister-erdogan-pays-a-visit-to-iran.en.mfa
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (n.d.). National foreign policy in the “Century of Türkiye.” Retrieved from, https://www.mfa.gov.tr/synopsis-of-the-turkish-foreign-policy.en.mfa
• Mueller, P. (2013). Europe’s foreign policy and the Middle East Peace Process: The construction of EU actorness in Conflict Resolution. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 14(1), 20–35.
• Mufti, M. (2002). From swamp to backyard: The Middle East in Turkish foreign policy. In R. O. Freedman (Ed.), The Middle East enters the 21st century (pp. 80-110). Gainsville: University Press of Florida.
• Nedos, V. (2024, December 4). Athens, Ankara agree to disagree but keep talking. Ekathimerini. Retrieved from https://www.ekathimerini.com/politics/foreign-policy/1255265/athens-ankaraagree- to-disagree-but-keep-talking/
• Oran, B. (2010). Turkish foreign policy (1990-2006): Facts and analyses with documents (trans.) Mustafa Akşin. Utah: The University of Utah Press.
• Ozkarasahin, S. (2022). Walking on thin ice: Will Turkey’s ‘compartmentalization’ work in Ukraine? Eurasia Daily Monitor, 19 (154). Retrieved from https://jamestown.org/program/walking-on-thinice- will-turkeys-compartmentalization-work-in-ukraine/
• Öniş, Z., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2016). Turkey and Russia in a shifting global order: Cooperation, conflict and Conceptualizing compartmentalization in international relations... asymmetric interdependence in a turbulent region. Third World Quarterly, 37(1), 71-95.
• Özdamar, Ö. (2016). Domestic sources of changing Turkish foreign policy toward the MENA during the 2010s: A role theoretic approach. In C. Cantir & J. Kaarbo (Eds.), Domestic role contestation, foreign policy, and International Relations (pp. 89-104). New York: Routledge.
• Özer, D.A. (2023, November 16). Compartmentalization of ties vital for Ankara, Athens relations. Daily Sabah. Retrieved from https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/news-analysis/compartmentalizationof- ties-vital-for-ankara-athens-relations
• Patrick, S. M., & Bennett, I. (2014). Learning to compartmentalize: How to prevent big power frictions from becoming major global headaches. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https:// www.cfr.org/blog/learning-compartmentalize-how-prevent-big-power-frictions-becoming-majorglobal- headaches
• Pujol, I. G. (2024). Theorising the hedging strategy: National interests, objectives, and mixed foreign policy instruments. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 13(2), 193-214. Renda, K.K. (2011). Turkey’s neighborhood policy: An emerging complex interdependence? Insight Turkey, 13(1), 89-108.
• Robins, P. (1992) Turkish policy and the Gulf Crisis, adventurist or dynamic? in C. H. Dodd (Ed.), Turkish foreign policy, new prospects (pp.70-87), Wistow: The Eothen Press.
• Rudd, K. (2022). Rivals within reason? US-Chinese competition is getting sharper—but doesn’t necessarily have to get more dangerous. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www. foreignaffairs. com/china/rivals-within-reason.
• Rüma, İ., & Çelikpala, M. (2019). Russian and Turkish foreign policy activism in the Syrian theater. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 16(62), 65-84.
• Sayari, S. (2000). Turkish foreign policy in the post-Cold War era: The challenges of multiregionalism. Journal of International Affairs, 54(1), 169-182.
• Sinkaya, B. (2014). Başbakan Erdoğan’ın Tahran ziyareti: Türkiye-İran ilişkilerinde yeni bir dönüm noktası. ORSAM. Retrieved from https://orsam.org.tr/yayinlar/basbakan-erdoganin-tahran-ziyaretiturkiye- iran-iliskilerinde-yeni-bir-donum-noktasi/
• Sinkaya, B. (2016). Iran and Turkey relations after the Nuclear Deal: A case for compartmentalization. Ortadogu Etütleri, 8(1), 80-100.
• Sinkaya, B. (2019). Turkey-Iran relations after the JDP. Istanbul: Institut Français d’études Anatoliennes. Retrieved from https://books.openedition.org/ifeagd/2934
• Smyth, C. (2021). ‘Tick the box and move on’: Compartmentalization and the treatment of the environment in decision‐making processes. Journal of Law and Society, 48(3), 410-433.
• Stein, A. (2017a). A new status quo: The West’s transactional relationship with Turkey. Heinrich Boll Stiftung. Retrieved from https://tr.boell.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/LY_E-Paper_Aaron%20 Stein_v3.pdf
• Stein, A. (2017b). An independent actor: Turkish foreign energy policy toward Russia, Iran, and Iraq. Atlantic Council. Retrieved from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/ An_Independent_Actor_web_0608.pdf
• Tanchum, M. (2020). Italy and Turkey‘s Europe-to-Africa commercial corridor: Rome and Ankara‘s geopolitical symbiosis is creating a new Mediterranean strategic paradigm. Austria Institut für Europa-und Sicherheitspolitik. Retrieved from https://www.aies.at/download/2020/AIESFokus- 2020-10.pdf
• Taşhan, S. (1985). Contemporary Turkish policies in the Middle East: Prospects and constraints. Foreign Policy, 12(1/2). 7-21.
• Teslova, E. (2021, May 24). Russia has ‘beneficial cooperation’ with Turkey despite differences on Ukraine: Lavrov. AA. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/russia-has-beneficialcooperation- with-turkey-despite-differences-on-ukraine-lavrov/2252497
• TRT World. (2024, September 4). Türkiye, Egypt partnership vital for regional peace and stability – Erdogan. Retrieved from https://www.trtworld.com/turkiye/turkiye-egypt-partnership-vital-forregional- peace-and-stability-erdogan-18203810
• Tsintsadze-Maass, E. (2024). Ontological crisis and the compartmentalization of insecurities. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(1), 1-14.
• Türkten, F., & Kasap, S. (2021, December 23). Turkey sees anti-Semitism as crime against humanity: President. AA. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/turkey-sees-anti-semitism-ascrime- against-humanity-president/2455165
• Ünlühisarcıklı, Ö. (2019, April 01). Turkey’s questionable commitment to NATO. GMF. Retrieved from https://www.gmfus.org/news/turkeys-questionable-commitment-nato
• Yıldırım, Z. (2022). An overview of Turkey-KRG relations after the 2017 Independence Referendum Initiative: From securitization to compartmentalization. [M. S. - Master of Science] METU Graduate School of Social Sciences.
• Zha, W. (2022). Leader security and hedging in the era of great power rivalry: Responses of the Philippines and Singapore. China International Strategy Review, 4(2), 305-319.