Exchanges and Peacemaking: Counterfactuals and Unexplored Possibilities

Year 2015, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 5 - 18, 19.06.2015

Iain Wilson

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.167334

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Exchanges and Peacemaking: Counterfactuals and Unexplored Possibilities

Abstract

We may expect international
exchange programmes to contribute to peaceful international relations, but how
strong is the evidence that they actually do? In addition to the intercultural
education discussed elsewhere in this issue, I classify mechanisms by which
exchanges might contribute to peace into four categories – signaling, attitude
change, network formation and institutional transfer – and assess the evidence
that exchanges affect international relations through each of these mechanisms.
Despite considerable research there are still important gaps in the evidence,
and these gaps may have significant consequences for how we organize exchanges
and what kinds of mobility we support. 

Keywords

International exchange programmes, peace, research evidence, institutions, learning

References

• Amir, Yehuda. “The Contact Hypothesis in Ethnic Relations.” Psychological Bulletin 71, no.5 (1969): 319-42.
• Arndt, Richard. The First Resort of Kings. Dulles: Potomac, 2005.
• Barnes, Barry. The Nature of Power. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1988.
• Blute, Marion. Darwinian Sociocultural Evolution. Cambridge: CUP, 2010.
• Brown, Michael, Sean Lynn-Jones, and Stephen Miller, eds. Debating the Democratic Peace. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1996.
• Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James Morrow, Randolph Siverson, and Alastair Smith. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93, no.4 (1999): 791-807.
• Griffin, Nicholas. Ping-Pong Diplomacy. New York: Scribner, 2014.
• Gullahorn, John, and Jeanne Gullahorn. “An Extension of the U-curve Hypothesis.” Journal of Social Issues 19, no.3 (1963): 33-47.
• Kant, Immanuel. Perpetual Peace. 1795. Accessed September 22,2014. https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ kant/kant1.htm.
• Mayers, David. The Ambassadors and America’s Soviet Policy. Oxford: OUP, 1996.
• Mitchell, Kristine. “Rethinking the ‘Erasmus Effect’ on European Identity.” Journal of Common Market Studies 53, no.2 (2015): 330-48.
• Murphy-Lejeune, Elizabeth. Student Mobility and Narrative in Europe. London: Routledge, 2002.
• Richerson, Peter, and Robert Boyd. Not By Genes Alone. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2005.
• Rose, Richard. Learning from Comparative Public Policy. London: Routledge, 2005.
• Scott-Smith, Giles. “Mapping the Undefinable.” Annals of the Academy of Social Science 616, no.1 (2008): 173-95.
• Sigalas, Emanual. “Cross-Border Mobility and European Identity.” European Union Politics 11, no.2 (2010): 241- 65.
• Smith, Michael. “Educational Leadership for a Free World.” The Teachers College Record 57, no.5 (1956): 285-89.
• Van Mol, Christof, and Joris Michielsen. “The Reconstruction of a Social Network Abroad.” Mobilities 10, no.4 (2015): 423-44. Published electronically January, 21, 2014.
• Waltz, Kenneth. Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics. Boston: Little, Brown, 1967.
• Wilson, Iain. “Darwinian Reasoning and Waltz’s Theory of International Politics.” International Relations 27, no.4 (2013): 417-38.
• ——— . “Ends Changed, Means Retained: Scholarship Programs, Political Influence and Drifting Goals.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17, no.1 (2015): 130-51.
• ——— . International Exchange Programs and Political Influence: Manufacturing Sympathy? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
• ——— . “What Should We Expect of ‘Erasmus Generations’?” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49, no.5 (2011): 1113-40.