Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Chinese School of International Relations: Myth or Reality?

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 95 - 104, 01.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.319916

Öz

Review article of:
Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, eds., Constructing a Chinese School of International
Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities (Oxon and NY: Routledge, 2016,
265 pp., USD 38.47, eBook

Kaynakça

  • Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647-59.
  • Chang, Teng-chi. “Debating the Chinese School of IR: A Reflective Review from Taiwan.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang, and Teng-chi Chang, 81-97. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Cox, Robert W. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10, no. 2 (1981): 126-55.
  • Karaomanoğlu, Ali, and Ersel Aydınlı. “Introduction to All Azimuth.” All Azimuth 1, no. 1 (2012): 5-7.
  • Köstem, Seçkin. “International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book.” All Azimuth 4, no. 1 (2015): 59-66.
  • Kristensen, Peter Marcus. “Navigating the Core-Periphery Structures of “Global IR”: Dialogues and Audiences for the Chinese School as Travelling Theory.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 143-61. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Ling, L. H. M. “What’s in a Name? A Critical Interrogation of the “Chinese School of IR”.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 17-34. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Noesselt, Nele. “Mapping the World from a Chinese Perspective? The Debate on Constructing an IR Theory with Chinese Characteristics.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 98-112. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Qin, Yaqing. “Development of International Relations Theory in China: Progress Through Debates.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11, no. 2 (2011): 231-57.
  • Qin, Yaqing. “A Relational Theory of World Politics.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 33-47.
  • Qin, Yaqing. “Why is There No Chinese International Relations Theory?” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 313-40.
  • Sune, Engin. “Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun.” All Azimuth 5, no. 1 (2016): 79-88.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press, 2006.
  • Wang, Jiangli, and Barry Buzan. “The English and Chinese Schools of International Relations: Comparisons and Lessons.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 115-42. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Wang, Yiwei. “China: Between Copying and Constructing.” In International Relations Scholarship Around the World, edited by Arlene B. Tickner and Ole Waever, 103-19. New York: Routledge, 2009.
  • Yan, Xuetong. “Pre-Qin Philosophy and China’s Rise Today.” In Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, edited by Daniel A. Bell and Sun Zhe, 199-221. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2011.
  • Yiwei, Wang, and Han Xueqing. “Why is There No Chinese IR Theory? A Cultural Perspective.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 52-67. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Zhang, Feng. “The Tsinghua Approach and the Inception of Chinese Theories of International Relations,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5, no. 1 (2012): 73-102.
  • Zhang, Yongjin. “Constructing a Chinese School of IR as Sociological Reality: Intellectual Engagement and Knowledge Production.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 192-209. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Zhao, Tingyang. “A Political World Philosophy in terms of All-under-heaven (Tian-xia).” Diogenes 221 (2009): 5-18.
  • Zhao, Tingyang. “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’ (Tian-xia).” Social Identities 12, no. 1 (January 2006): 29-41.
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 95 - 104, 01.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.319916

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647-59.
  • Chang, Teng-chi. “Debating the Chinese School of IR: A Reflective Review from Taiwan.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang, and Teng-chi Chang, 81-97. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Cox, Robert W. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10, no. 2 (1981): 126-55.
  • Karaomanoğlu, Ali, and Ersel Aydınlı. “Introduction to All Azimuth.” All Azimuth 1, no. 1 (2012): 5-7.
  • Köstem, Seçkin. “International Relations Theories and Turkish International Relations: Observations Based on a Book.” All Azimuth 4, no. 1 (2015): 59-66.
  • Kristensen, Peter Marcus. “Navigating the Core-Periphery Structures of “Global IR”: Dialogues and Audiences for the Chinese School as Travelling Theory.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 143-61. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Ling, L. H. M. “What’s in a Name? A Critical Interrogation of the “Chinese School of IR”.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 17-34. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Noesselt, Nele. “Mapping the World from a Chinese Perspective? The Debate on Constructing an IR Theory with Chinese Characteristics.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 98-112. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Qin, Yaqing. “Development of International Relations Theory in China: Progress Through Debates.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11, no. 2 (2011): 231-57.
  • Qin, Yaqing. “A Relational Theory of World Politics.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 33-47.
  • Qin, Yaqing. “Why is There No Chinese International Relations Theory?” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 313-40.
  • Sune, Engin. “Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun.” All Azimuth 5, no. 1 (2016): 79-88.
  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press, 2006.
  • Wang, Jiangli, and Barry Buzan. “The English and Chinese Schools of International Relations: Comparisons and Lessons.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 115-42. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Wang, Yiwei. “China: Between Copying and Constructing.” In International Relations Scholarship Around the World, edited by Arlene B. Tickner and Ole Waever, 103-19. New York: Routledge, 2009.
  • Yan, Xuetong. “Pre-Qin Philosophy and China’s Rise Today.” In Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, edited by Daniel A. Bell and Sun Zhe, 199-221. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2011.
  • Yiwei, Wang, and Han Xueqing. “Why is There No Chinese IR Theory? A Cultural Perspective.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 52-67. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Zhang, Feng. “The Tsinghua Approach and the Inception of Chinese Theories of International Relations,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5, no. 1 (2012): 73-102.
  • Zhang, Yongjin. “Constructing a Chinese School of IR as Sociological Reality: Intellectual Engagement and Knowledge Production.” In Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing debates and sociological realities, edited by Yongjin Zhang and Teng-chi Chang, 192-209. New York: Routledge, 2016.
  • Zhao, Tingyang. “A Political World Philosophy in terms of All-under-heaven (Tian-xia).” Diogenes 221 (2009): 5-18.
  • Zhao, Tingyang. “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’ (Tian-xia).” Social Identities 12, no. 1 (January 2006): 29-41.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Review Article
Yazarlar

Emre Demir

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Chicago Demir, Emre. “Chinese School of International Relations: Myth or Reality?”. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 6, sy. 2 (Temmuz 2017): 95-104. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.319916.

Manuscripts submitted for consideration must follow the style on the journal’s web page.The manuscripts should not be submitted simultaneously to any other publication, nor may they have been previously published elsewhere in English. However, articles that are published previously in another language but updated or improved can be submitted. For such articles, the author(s) will be responsible in seeking the required permission for copyright. Manuscripts may be submitted via Submission Form found at: http://www.allazimuth.com/authors-guideline/. For any questions please contact: allazimuth@bilkent.edu.tr