Broadening the Horizons of the “International” by Historicizing it: Comparative Historical Analysis

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 307 - 325, 01.07.2019

Mustafa Serdar Palabıyık

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.477305

Cited By: 2

Öz

This article intends to analyze the use of comparative
historical analysis (CHA) in the discipline of International Relations (IR).
After describing the historical evolution and fundamental premises of CHA, the article
continues with the classification of CHA. Then the strengths and weaknesses of
the method as well as its utilization by various theories of IR are discussed.
The second part of the article deals with the employment of CHA by the author
of this article in his own research design, in order to give an idea that how CHA
might contribute to a better understanding of the “international”. In doing
that, the advantages and disadvantages of the method are revisited in a way to
show the contributions provided as well as the difficulties encountered in
practice. The article concludes that CHA might contribute to the study of IR by
enhancing interdisciplinary approaches and by adding a socio-historical depth
to the ‘international’, which helps to overcome historicism and presentism at
the same time. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Comparative historical analysis, international relations, history, method

Kaynakça

• Adas, Michael. “Comparative History and Challenge of the Grand Narrative.” In A Companion to World History, edited by Douglas Northrop, 229–43. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2012. Aston, T. H., and C. H. E. Philpin, ed. The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Baldwin, Peter. “Comparing and Generalizing: Why All History is Comparative, Yet No History Is Sociology.” In Comparison and History: Europe in Cross-National Perspective, edited by Deborah Cohen and Maura O’Connor, 1–22. New York and London: Routledge, 2004. Bendix, Reinhard. Work and Authority in Industry: Managerial Ideologies in the Course of Industrialization. New York: Transaction Publishers, 1963. Bloch, Marc. “Pour une histoire compare des sociétés européennes.” Revue de synthèse historique 46 (1928): 15–50. Brenner, Robert. “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe.” Past and Present 70 (1976): 30–75. Buzan, Barry. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014. Cohen, Deborah, and Maura O’Connor. “Introduction: Comparative History, Cross-National History, Transnational History – Definitions.” In Comparison and History: Europe in Cross-National Perspective, edited by Deborah Cohen and Maura O’Connor, ix–xxiv. New York and London: Routledge, 2004. Coulborn, Rushton. “A Paradigm for Comparative History?” Current Anthropology 10, no. 2–3 (1969): 175–78. Degler, Carl N. “Comparative History: An Essay Review.” The Journal of Southern History 34, no. 3 (1968): 425–30. Dunne, Tim. “A British School of International Relations.” In The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century, edited by Jack Hayward, Brian Berry, and Archie Brown, 395–424. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Elman, Colin, and Miriam Fendius Elman. “Diplomatic History and International Relations Theory: Respecting Difference and Crossing Boundaries.” International Security 22, no. 1 (1997): 5–21. Esenbel, Selçuk. Japon Modernleşmesi ve Osmanlı: Japonya’nın Türk Dünyası ve İslam Politikaları. 2nd ed. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2015. Gills, B. K. “International Relations Theory and the Processes of World History: Three Approaches.” In The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Hugh C. Dyer and Leon Mangasarian, 103–54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1989. Grew, Raymond. “The Case for Comparing Histories.” The American Historical Review 85, no. 4 (1980): 763–78. Friberg, Katarina, Mary Hilson, and Natasha Vall. “Reflections on Trans-national Comparative History from an Anglo-Swedish Perspective.” Historisk Tidskrift 127, no. 4 (2007): 717–37. Hobson, John M. “What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempocentrism’ in International Relations.” In Historical Sociology of International Relations, edited by Stephen Hobden and John M. Hobson, 3–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Hobden, Stephen, and John M. Hobson, ed. Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Hoffmann, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106, no. 3, Discoveries and Interpretations: Studies in Contemporary Scholarship, Volume I (1977): 41–60. Iriye, Akira. Global and Transnational History: The Past, Present and Future. London and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2013. Kocka, Jürgen and Heinz-Gerhard Haupt. “Comparison and Beyond: Traditions, Scope and Perspectives of Comparative History.” In Transnational History: Central European Approaches and New Perspectives, edited by Heinz-Gerhard Haupt and Jürgen Kocka, 1–32. New York: Berghahn Books, 2009. Lange, Matthew. Comparative-Historical Methods. London: Sage, 2013. Levine, Philippa. “Is Comparative History Possible?” History and Theory 53 (2014): 331–47. Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. “Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Paige, Jeffery M. Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World. New York: Free Press, 1975. Palabıyık, Mustafa Serdar. “Comparative Narratives of ‘Catastrophe’: Ottoman Perception of Balkan Wars and Greek Perception of Asia Minor Campaign.” In 100. Yılında Balkan Savaşları (1912–1913): İhtilaflı Duruşlar, Vol. I, edited by Mustafa Türkeş, 477–92. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 2014. ———. “The Emergence of the Idea of 'International Law' in the Ottoman Empire before the Treaty of Paris (1856).” Middle Eastern Studies 50, no. 2 (2014): 233–51. ———. “İngiliz Okulu.” In Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, edited by Ramazan Gözen, 217–56. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2014. ———. “International Law for Survival: Teaching International Law in the Late Ottoman Empire (1859–1922).” Bulletin of School of Oriental and African Studies 78, no. 2 (2015): 271–92. ———. “Osmanlı ve Japon Entelektüellerinin Modernleşme ve Medeniyet Algılarının Mukayesesi.” In Ortadoğu Barışı İçin Türk-Japon İşbirliği, edited by Masanori Naito, İdiris Danışmaz, Bahadır Pehlivantürk, M. Serdar Palabıyık, 3–18. Kyoto: Doshisha University Press, 2015. ———. “The Sultan, the Shah and the King in Europe: The Practice of Ottoman, Persian and Siamese Royal Travel and Travel Writing.” Journal of Asian History 50, no. 2 (2016): 201–34. ———. “Travel, Civilization and the East: The Ottoman Travellers’ Perception of the “East” in the Late Ottoman Empire.” PhD diss., Middle East Technical University, 2010. Paulmann, Johannes. “Searching for a ‘Royal International’: The Mechanics of Monarchical Relations in Nineteenth Century Europe.” In The Mechanics of Internationalism: Culture, Society and Politics from the 1840s to the First World War, edited by Martin H. Geyer and Johannes Paulmann, 145–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Rosenthal, Franz. A History of Muslim Historiography. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1952. Rostow, W.W. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960. Saunier, Pierre-Yves. Transnational History. London and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2013. Sewell, Jr., William H. “Marc Bloch and the Logic of Comparative History.” History and Theory 6, no. 2 (1967): 208–18. Siegrist, Hannes. “Comparative History of Cultures and Societies: From Cross-Societal Analysis to the Study of Intercultural Interdependencies.” In “Comparative Methodologies in the Social Sciences: Cross-Disciplinary Inspirations.” Special issue, Comparative Education 42, no. 3 (2006): 377–404. Sluga, Glenda. “The Nation and the Comparative Imagination.” In Comparison and History: Europe in Cross-National Perspective, edited by Deborah Cohen and Maura O’Connor, 103–14. New York and London: Routledge, 2004. Smith, Thomas W. History and International Relations. London and New York: Routledge, 1999. Steinmetz, George. “Comparative History and Its Critics: A Genealogy and a Possible Solution.” In A Companion to Global Historical Thought, edited by Prasenjit Duara, Viren Murthy and Andrew Sartori, 412–36. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Skocpol, Theda. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. Skocpol, Theda, and Margaret Somers. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22, no. 2 (1980): 174–97. Tilly, Charles. As Sociology Meets History: Studies in Social Discontinuity. New York: Academic Press, 1981. ———. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Sage, 1984. Van Den Braembussche, A. A. “Historical Explanation and Comparative Method: Towards a Theory of the History of Society.” History and Theory 28, no. 1 (1989): 1–24. Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World-System, Vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press, 1974. ———. The Modern World-System, Vol. II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750. New York: Academic Press, 1980. ———. The Modern World-System, Vol. III: The Second Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730–1840s. San Diego: Academic Press, 1989. ———. The Modern World-System, Vol. IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011. Watson, Adam. The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge, 1992. Werner, Michael, and Bénédicte Zimmermann. “Beyond Comparison: Histoire Croisée and CHAllenge of Reflexivity.” History and Theory 45 (2006): 30–50. Wight, Martin. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977. Williams, Andrew J., Amelia Hadfield, and J. Simon Rofe. International History and International Relations. London and New York: Routledge, 2012. Worringer, Renée. Ottomans Imagining Japan: East, Middle East and Non-Western Modernity at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan, Transnational History Series, 2014.