Review Article
BibTex RIS Cite

BALKAN MIGRATION ROUTE AND TÜRKİYE IN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX THEORY

Year 2025, Volume: 26 Issue: 4, 197 - 224, 29.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1679421
https://izlik.org/JA89EM28JL

Abstract

Border security is a critical aspect of national and societal stability for many countries, presenting complex challenges for nation-states. The large-scale population movements from Syria following the Arab Spring in 2011 have underscored the importance of effective border management strategies. Rather than framing migration as a "national security problem," it is essential to approach these movements as multifaceted phenomena requiring balanced policies that prioritize both state interests and humanitarian considerations.
The Balkan route serves as a primary pathway for migrants traveling from Syria to Europe. States along this route often perceive migration through a security lens, which can lead to the development of policies that prioritize control over humanitarian needs, potentially exacerbating vulnerabilities among migrant populations. A critical examination of this securitization reveals the need for policies that address the root causes of migration while upholding human rights.
Geographically, Türkiye occupies a strategic position between countries of origin and destination, acting as a key transit state. This positioning enables Türkiye to influence migration dynamics between the Middle East and Europe. Rather than solely acting as a barrier, Türkiye's role can be understood as that of a mediator, shaping migration flows through its policies and engaging with European Union frameworks. This study analyzes the challenges posed by irregular migration along the Balkan route, with a focus on the dynamics between Europe and Türkiye. Additionally, it evaluates whether Türkiye aligns with the concept of an "insulator state" in the context of irregular migration, exploring its role in facilitating or managing migration flows.

References

  • Abikova, J., & Piotrowicz, W. S. (2021). Shaping the Balkan corridor: Development and changes in the migration route 2015–16. International Migration, 59(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12828
  • Achilli, L. (2018). The “good” smuggler: The ethics and morals of human smuggling among Syrians. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 676(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217746641
  • Adamson, F. B., & Tsourapas, G. (2019). The migration state in the Global South: Nationalizing, developmental, and neoliberal models of migration management. International Migration Review, 54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319879057
  • Adamson, F., & Greenhill, K. (2021). The power atlas: Seven backgrounds of a networked world (pp. 84–105). European Council on Foreign Relations & Mercator Stiftung. https://ecfr.eu/special/power-atlas/people/
  • Alpan, B. (2022). Readmission or desecuritization? The recent migration crisis and bordering narratives and practices in Turkey. https://inex.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_inex/Fences_Refugee_Boats_FULL_PDF__2_.pdf#page=67
  • Bank, A., & Karadağ, R. (2014). The “Ankara moment”: The politics of Turkey’s regional power in the Middle East. Third World Quarterly, 35(2), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.878490
  • Beznec, B., Speer, M., & Mitrović, M. (2017). Governing the Balkan route: Macedonia, Serbia and the European border regime. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Southeast Europe. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29918.23363
  • Bialasiewicz, L. (2012). Off-shoring and out-sourcing the borders of Europe: Libya and EU border work in the Mediterranean. Geopolitics, 17(4), 843–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.660579
  • Bilgin, P. (2011). The politics of studying securitization? The Copenhagen School in Turkey. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 399–412.
  • Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
  • Carrera, S., den Hertog, L., & Parkin, J. (2015). The EU’s response to the refugee crisis: Taking stock and setting priorities. Centre for European Policy Studies. https://cdn.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/EU%20Response%20to%20the%202015%20Refugee%20Crisis_0.pdf
  • Clewett, P., Litzkow, J., & Vallentine, J. (2024). Mixed migration in the Western Balkans: Shifting policies, smuggling dynamics and risks. Mixed Migration Centre; Danish Refugee Council.
  • Cocco, E. (2017). Where is the European frontier? The Balkan migration crisis and its impact on relations between the EU and the Western Balkans. European View, 16, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0471-5
  • Erdoğan, M., Eminoğlu, N., Batalla, L. A., Unutulmaz, O., & Püttmann, F. (2016). A new era in EU–Türkiye cooperation: The Syrian crisis and EU–Türkiye deal of 18 March 2016: The perceptions of European and Turkish decision makers. İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı (İKV).
  • Ersoy Ceylan, T. (2024). Insulator, player, or assertive insulator? Reassessing Türkiye’s role in the Eastern Mediterranean. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi Dergisi, 7(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.51763/uid.1654694
  • Esen, B., & Gümüşçü, S. (2016). Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), 1581–1606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1133242
  • European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights. (2016). Push-backs at the Greek–Macedonian border violating human rights. https://www.proasyl.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/CaseReport_Idomeni_ECtHR_20160914.pdf
  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs. (2025, June 11). Pact on migration and asylum: Commission report assesses progress and next steps halfway through implementation. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/pact-migration-and-asylum-commission-report-assesses-progress-and-next-steps-halfway-through-2025-06-11_en
  • European Council on Refugees and Exiles. (2016). The implementation of the hotspots in Italy and Greece (pp. 48–49). Dutch Refugee Council. https://www.ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/HOTSPOTS-Report-5.12.2016..pdf
  • European Council on Refugees and Exiles. (2024). AIDA country report on Croatia – 2023 update. https://www.ecre.org/aida-country-report-on-croatia-2023-update/
  • European Council. (2003). Thessaloniki European Council: Presidency conclusions. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/20847/76279.pdf
  • European Council. (2024). Western Balkans route. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/western-balkans-route/#situation
  • Frontex. (2016). Western Balkan route: Annual risk analysis 2016. https://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/Risk_Analysis/WB_ARA_2016.pdf
  • Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, P. (2024). Perspectives of flow and place: Rethinking notions of migration and mobility in policy-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(6), 1299–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2278400
  • Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. Routledge.
  • İçduygu, A. (2000). The politics of international migratory regimes: Transit migration flows in Türkiye. International Social Science Journal, 52(165), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00265
  • Imai, K. (2017). Rethinking the insulator state: Turkey’s border security and the Syrian civil war. Eurasian Border Review, 7(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.14943/ebr.7.1.19
  • International Centre for Migration Policy Development. (2023). Western Balkans and Türkiye 2023. https://www.icmpd.org/file/download/59321/file/ICMPD%20Migration%20Outlook%20Western%20Balkans
  • International Organization for Migration. (2022). Migration trends in the Western Balkans in 2022. https://bih.iom.int/resources/migration-trends-western-balkans-2022
  • International Organization for Migration. (2023). Migration trends in the Western Balkans in 2022. https://serbia.iom.int
  • International Organization for Migration. (2024). Migration trends in the Western Balkans in 2023. https://serbia.iom.int
  • Janmyr, M. (2016). Precarity in exile: The legal status of Syrian refugees in Lebanon. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 35(4), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdw016
  • Karadağ, S., & Üstübici, A. (2021). Protection during pre-pandemic and COVID-19 periods in Türkiye. CIDOB; ADMIGOV Project Paper 4, 6–34. https://www.cidob.org/en/publications/publication_series/project_papers/admigov/protection_during_pre_pandemic_and_covid_19_periods_in_T%C3%BCrkiye
  • Kaya, A. (2021). Migration as a leverage tool in international relations: Turkey as a case study. Uluslararası İlişkiler, Advance online publication, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.856870
  • Kaya, A. (2022). AB–Türkiye mülteci mutabakatı: Tampon ülke? TÜSİAD Küresel Siyaset Forumu Makale Dizisi (No. 2). https://eu.bilgi.edu.tr/media/files/T%C3%9CS%C4%B0AD_K%C3%BCresel_Siyaset_Forumu_Makale_Dizisi_No-2.pdf
  • Kelly, R. E. (2007). Security theory in the “new regionalism.” International Studies Review, 9(1), 197–229.
  • Kuschminder, K., Dubow, T., İçduygu, A., Üstübici, A., Kirişçioğlu, E., Engbersen, G., & Mitrovic, O. (2019). Migration consultant decision-making on the Balkan route and the EU–Türkiye statement. Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG), United Nations University–Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). https://mirekoc.ku.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/2916_Volledige_Tekst_tcm28-413430.pdf
  • Lebrun, M., Ellingsen, T., Dumur-Laanila, H., Bujold, S., Miller, A., James, B., Akrap, G., & Mandić, J. (2025). Instrumentalized migration: Avoiding the trap (Version 2). Open Research Europe, 4, Article 251. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18635.2
  • Miholjcic, N. (2022). Migration as an instrument of modern political warfare: Cases of Turkey, Morocco and Belarus (Jean Monnet Network on EU Law Enforcement Working Paper Series No. 12/22). https://eulawenforcement.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Working-Paper-12-22.pdf
  • Osso, B. N. (2025). A creeping crisis of migration management? Institutional responses and implications for “access” at the EU’s physical, legal, and social borders. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 23(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2025.2471288
  • Puleri, M. (2021). The Balkan route (and its afterlife): The new normal in the European politics of migration. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 24(3), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2021.2015658
  • Saatçioğlu, B. (2020). The European Union’s refugee crisis and rising functionalism in EU–Turkey relations. Turkish Studies, 21(4), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2019.1671835
  • Sardelić, J. (2017). From temporary protection to transit migration: Responses to refugee crises along the Western Balkan route (RSCAS Working Paper 2017/35). European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Global Governance Programme. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/47168/RSCAS_2017_35.pdf
  • Schloenhaldt, A. (2019). Irregular migration and smuggling of migrants along the Balkan route: 2011–2017. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/15559.pdf
  • Souza, T. A. F. (2021). Rethinking the regional security complex theory: A South American view between 2008–2016. Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional, 7(1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.18847/1.13.7
  • Tsourapas, G. (2019). The Syrian refugee crisis and foreign policy decision-making in Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(4), 464–481.
  • Tsourdi, E. L., & Zardo, F. (2025). Migration governance through funding: Theoretical, normative, and empirical perspectives. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2024.2407584
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (1951). Convention relating to the status of refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/media/1951-refugee-convention-and-1967-protocol-relating-status-refugees
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2013). Refugee protection and international migration in the Western Balkans: Suggestions for a comprehensive regional approach (Concept note). https://www.unhcr.org/ie/media/refugee-protection-and-international-migration-western-balkans-suggestions-comprehensive
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2015). Syria regional refugee response. https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2024). Refugee statistics. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics
  • Üstübici, A., & İçduygu, A. (2018). Border closures and externalization of immigration controls in the Mediterranean: A comparative analysis of Morocco and Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 60, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2018.16
  • Weber, B. (2017). The EU–Turkey refugee deal and the not quite closed Balkan route. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sarajevo/13436.pdf
  • World Bank. (2025). Türkiye overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/turkey/overview
There are 54 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Political Science (Other), International Relations (Other)
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Sıbel Yanık Aslan 0000-0003-2436-6763

Submission Date April 18, 2025
Acceptance Date November 11, 2025
Publication Date December 29, 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1679421
IZ https://izlik.org/JA89EM28JL
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 26 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Yanık Aslan, S. (2025). BALKAN MIGRATION ROUTE AND TÜRKİYE IN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX THEORY. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(4), 197-224. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1679421


This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License since 2023.