INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING TÜRKİYE’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4, 158 - 183, 31.12.2024

Ayşegül Han

https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1477509

Öz

The research examines the causal relationship between foreign direct investment, economic growth, population growth, urbanization rate, renewable energy consumption, globalization factors, and ecological footprint in Türkiye between 1980 and 2020. As a consequence of the analyses, it is found that there is a bidirectional causality between ecological footprint and foreign direct investment. Similarly, between globalization and Ecological Footprint, a bidirectional causality was found. While a unidirectional causality was observed from economic growth to ecological footprint, a unidirectional relationship was determined from population growth to ecological footprint.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Toda Yamamato Causality Analysis, Ecological Footprint, Urbanization, Globalization, Foreign Direct Investments

TÜRKİYE’NİN EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİNE ETKİ EDEN FAKTÖRLERİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Çalışmanın temel amacı, 1980-2020 yılları arasında Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar, ekonomik büyüme, nüfus artışı, kentleşme oranı, yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ve küreselleşme faktörleri ile ekolojik ayak izi arasındaki nedensellik ilişkilerini incelemektir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, ekolojik ayak izi ile doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar arasında çift yönlü nedensellik olduğu bulgusu elde edilmiştir. Benzer şekilde, küreselleşme ile ekolojik ayak izi arasında da çift yönlü nedensellik olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ekonomik büyümeden ekolojik ayak izine doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik gözlemlenirken, nüfus artışından ekolojik ayak izine doğru da tek yönlü bir ilişki belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Toda Yamamato Nedensellik Analizi, Ekolojik Ayak İzi, Küreselleşme, Kentleşme, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar

Kaynakça

• Abdullahi, N. M., Ibrahim, A. A., Zhang, Q., & Huo, X. (2024). Dynamic linkages between financial development, economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, and ecological footprint: an empirical account of ECOWAS countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-28. doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04713-3.
• Acar, S., Altıntaş, N., & Haziyev, V. (2023). The effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint in Azerbaijan: an ARDL bound test approach with structural breaks. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 30, 41-59. doi: 10.1007/s10651-022-00551-6
• Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., Mahmood, F., Hafeez, M., & Ali, N. (2019). Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (26), 18565-18582. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9.
• Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., & Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060.
• Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Murshed, M., Shehzad, K., Akram, R., Cui, L., & Khan, Z. (2021). Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does Financial Globalization Matter?. Sustainable Cities and Society, 70. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102881.
• Al-Mulali, U., & Özturk, I. (2015). The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, ındustrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East And North African) region, Energy, 84(1), 382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004.
• Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai C., Low, S. T., & Mohammed, A. H. (2014). Investigating the environmental kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315- 323. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029.
• Ansari, M. A., Ahmad, M. R., Siddique, S., & Mansoor, K. (2020). An environment Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: Evidence from GCC countries. Carbon Management, 11(4), 355-368. doi: 10.1080/17583004.2020.1790242.
• Ansari, M. A., Haider, S., & Masood, T. (2021). Do renewable energy and globalization enhance ecological footprint: an analysis of top renewable energy countries? Environmental Science Pollution Research, 28, 6719-6732. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10786-0.
• Ansari, M. A., & Villanthenkodath, M.A. (2021). Does tourism development promote ecological footprint? A nonlinear ARDL approach. Anatolia, 33(4), 614-626. doi: 10.1080/13032917.2021.1985542.
• Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., Nassani, A. A., Abro, M. M. Q., Zaman, K., & Kabbani, A. (2021). Evaluating ecological footprints through ınbound tourism, population density, and global trade. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30(1), 555-560. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/122445.
• Apaydın, Ş. (2020). Küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayakizi üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 23-42. doi: 10.30784/epfad.695836.
• Apaydın, Ş., Ursavaş, U., & Koç, Ü. (2021). The impact of globalization on the ecological footprint: do convergence clubs matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-15. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-241707/v1.
• Arif, M., Gill, A. R., & Ali, M. (2023). Analyzing the non-linear association between urbanization and ecological footprint: An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(50), 109063-109076. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30012-x.
• Arogundade, S., Mduduzi, B., & Hassan, A. S. (2022). Spatial impact of foreign direct investment on ecological footprint in Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(34), 51589-51608. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18831-w.
• Atılgan, D., & Dallı, T. (2024). Küreselleşme Türkiye’deki ekolojik ayak izini etkiliyor mu? ARDL testinden kanıtlar. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (47), 480-510.
• Baloch, M. A., Zhang, J., Iqbal, K., & Iqbal, Z. (2019). The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 6199–6208. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9.
• Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Gokmenoglu, K. K., Taspinar, N., & Cantos-Cantos, J. M. (2019). An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 23010- 23026. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x.
• Bagliani, M., Bravo, G., & Dalmazzone, S. (2008). A consumption-based approach to environmental kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 650-661. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.010.
• Bucak, Ç., & Saygılı, F. (2022). Türkiye’de ve G7 ülkelerinde dışa açıklık ve ekolojik ayak izi ilişkisi: Yatay kesit bağımlılığı altında panel veri analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(3), 346-365. doi: 10.53443/anadoluibfd.1138234.
• Chen, Y., Lee, C. C., & Chen, M. (2022). Ecological footprint, human capital, and urbanization. Energy & Environment, 33(3), 487-510. doi: 10.1177/0958305X211008610.
• Chowdhury, M. A. F., Shanto, P. A., Ahmed, A., & Rumana, R. H. (2021). Does foreign direct investments impair the ecological footprint? New evidence from the panel quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 14372-14385. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11518-0.
• Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., & Doğan, E. (2018). Analyzing the Environmental Kuznets Curve for the EU countries: The role of ecological footprint. (MPRA Paper, No. 106882). doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4.
• Destek, M., & Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. (MPRA Paper, No. 104246).
• Doğan, E., & Shah, S. F. (2022). Analyzing the role of renewable energy and energy ıntensity in the ecological footprint of the United Arab Emirates. Sustainability, 14(1). doi: 10.3390/su14010227.
• Doytch, N. (2020). The impact of foreign direct investment on the ecological footprints of nations. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8. doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2020.100085.
• Duman, E. (2023). Seçilmiş ekonomik değişkenlerin ekolojik ayak izine etkisinin analizi: BRICS-T ülkeleri örneği. Sosyoekonomi, 31(58), 277-288. doi: 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.04.14.
• Gülmez, A., Altıntaş, N., & Kahraman, Ü. O. (2020) A puzzle over ecological footprint, energy consumption and economic growth: the case of Turkey. Environmental Ecological Statatistic, 27(4), 753-768. doi: 10.1007/s10651-020-00465-1
• Hadj, B. (2021). Nonlinear impact of biomass energy consumption on ecological footprint in a fossil fuel– dependent economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 69329-69342. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15521-x.
• Hassan, S. T., Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516.
• Hervieux, M. S. & Darné, O. (2015). Environmental Kuznets Curve And ecological footprint: A time series analysis. Economics Bulletin, 35(1),814-826.
• Hussain, M., Usman, M., Khan, J. A., Tarar, Z. H., & Sarwar, M. A. (2022). Reinvestigation of environmental Kuznets curve with ecological footprints: Empirical analysis of economic growth and population density. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1). doi: 10.1002/pa.2276.
• Irshad, H., & Hussain, A. (2017). Analysis of ecological efficiency and ıts influencing factors in developing countries. (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Department of Environmental Economics, Working Paper, No. 11).
• Karaduman, C. (2022). The effects of economic globalization and productivity on environmental quality: Evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(1), 639-652. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15717-1.
• Kesbiç, C. Y. & Şimşek, D. (2020). Çevresel riskleri azaltmada çevre vergilerinin etkisi: Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye örneği. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(46): 20-39.
• Kılınç, E. C. (2023). Yenilenebilir enerji ve fosil yakıt tüketiminin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(3), 731-749. doi: 10.29106/fesa.1307807.
• Kırıkkaleli, D., Adebayo, T. S., Khan, Z., & Ali, S. (2021). Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), 14009-14017. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7.
• Kongbuamai, N., Zafar, M. W., Zaidi, S. A. H., & Liu, Y. (2020). Determinants of the ecological footprint in Thailand: The influences of tourism, trade openness, and population density. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 40171-40186. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09977-6.
• Kongkuah, M. (2024). Impact of Belt and Road countries’ renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(4), 8709-8734. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03068-5.
• Langnel, Z., & Amegavi, G. B. (2020). Globalization, electricity consumption and ecological footprint: An autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, 102482. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102482.
• Magazzino, C. (2024). Ecological footprint, electricity consumption, and economic growth in China: geopolitical risk and natural resources governance. Empirical Economics, 66, 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s00181-023-02460-4.
• Murshed, M., Elheddad, M., Ahmed, R. , Bassim, M. & Than, E. T. (2022). Foreign direct investments, renewable electricity output, and ecological footprints: Do financial globalization facilitate renewable energy transition and environmental welfare in Bangladesh? Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29, 33-78. doi: 10.1007/s10690-021-09335-7.
• Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal, 86(5), 2057-2070. doi: 10.1007/s10708-020-10175-7.
• Nuta, F., Shahbaz, M., Khan, I., Cutcu, I., Khan, H., & Eren, M. V. (2024). Dynamic impact of demographic features, FDI, and technological innovations on ecological footprint: evidence from European emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32345-7.
• Özbek, S. (2023). Ekonomik büyüme, küreselleşme ve ekolojik ayak izi ilişkisi: ASEAN-5 ülkeleri üzerine ekonometrik bir analiz. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 14(37), 123-138. doi: 10.21076/vizyoner.1144317.
• Pata, U. K. (2021). Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective. Renewable Energy, 173, 197-208. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.125.
• Roy, A. (2024). The impact of foreign direct investment, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and natural resources on ecological footprint: an Indian perspective. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(1), 141-161. doi: 10.1108/IJESM-09-2022-0004.
• Rudolph, A., & Figge, L. (2017). Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecological Indicators, 81, 348-361. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060.
• Sabır, S., & Görüş, M. S. (2019). The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the south Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 33387-33398. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06458-3.
• Sanatçı Aktaş, G., & Bilgili, A. (2022). Çevre teknolojisi patentleri ve yenilenebilir enerjinin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkilerine ilişkin ampirik bir çalışma. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 15(3), 1052-1068. doi: 10.35674/kent.1023069.
• Shahbaz, M., Doğan, M., Akkus, H. T., & Gursoy, S. (2023). The effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint: evidence from top 10 emitter countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(29), 73518-73533. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27573-2.
• Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Qureshi, M. A. (2019). Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(11), 11191-11211. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04351-7.
• Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I., & Sinha, A. (2020). Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 102138. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138.
• Şahin Kutlu, Ş., & Kutlu, M. (2022). Turizm faaliyetlerinin ekolojik ayak izi üzerine etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Maliye Dergisi, 182, 233-249.
• Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto T. (1995). Statistical inferences in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225‐250. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8.
• Van Tran, H., Tran, A. V., Bui Hoang, N., & Mai, T. N. H. (2024). Asymmetric effects of foreign direct investment and globalization on ecological footprint in Indonesia. Plos One, 19(1). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297046.
• Villanthenkodath, M. A., & Pal, S. (2023). How economic globalization affects the ecological footprint in India? A novel dynamic ARDL simulations. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. doi: 10.1108/JEAS-01-2022-0005.
• Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers: Philadelphia.
• Wang, X. (2021). Determinants of ecological and carbon footprints to assess the framework of environmental sustainability in BRICS countries: A panel ARDL and causality estimation model. Environmental Research, 197, 111111. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111111.
• Wang, Y., Kang, L., Wu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2013). Estimating the environmental kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: A spatial econometric approach. Ecological Indicator, 34, 15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.021.
• Yağış, O. (2023). Finansal gelişme ve doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkileri: Panel nedensellik analizi. Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Davranış Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(19), 200-215. DOI: 10.52096/jsrbs.9.19.15.
• Yang, X., Li, N., Mu, H., Zhang, M., Pang, J., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Study on the long-term and short-term effects of globalization and population aging on ecological footprint in OECD countries. Ecological Complexity, 47. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2021.100946.
• Yavuz, E. (2021). Çevre vergileri ile ekolojik ayak izi arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye üzerine kanıtlar. Journal Of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 7(45), 1937-1945.
• Yılancı, V., & Görüş, M. S. (2020). Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 40552-40562. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10092-9.
• Yılmaz, Ö., & Çamkaya, S. (2022). CO2 emisyonu ve ekolojik ayak izi bağlamında N-11 ülkelerinde çevresel Kuznets eğrisinin test edilmesi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi (KAÜİİBFD), 13(26), 915- 937. doi: 10.36543/kauiibfd.2022.037.
• Zafar, M. W, Zaidi, S. A. H., Khan, N. R., Mirza, F. M., Hou, F., & Kirmani, S. A. A. (2019). The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resources Policy, 63, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428.