Annual distribution of body donation application rates in Istanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

Objectives: Body donation is infrequent in Türkiye. Therefore, understanding body donation behavior becomes vital for managing existing awareness activities. Studies on donor profiles and motivations provide valuable data that could be used to shape the content of awareness activities. The timing of awareness activities is also important for increasing the effectiveness. Although annual differences in donation registrations have been reported, studies investigating the monthly changes within a calendar year are limited. This study aimed to investigate the official records of two departments of anatomy in Istanbul for outlining the monthly changes of body donation registrations. Methods: The official records of 450 body donors who registered between 2012 and 2019 to the body donation programs of two departments of anatomy were evaluated. Annual and monthly registration numbers were recorded and analyzed. Results: For the 2012-2019 period, 154 female (34.2%) and 296 male (65.8%) donors were registered to both programs. In general, the registrations were more frequent in May, November and December (χ2=51.28; p<0.001). Interestingly, female donors preferred to register in May, June, November, and December (χ2=40.961; p<0.001), while males preferred to register in March, April, May, September, and December (χ2=24.757; p=0.01). Conclusion: Currently, existing awareness activities in Türkiye are organized at the end of October which falls just before the Autumn peak of donor registrations. Therefore, planning awareness activities prior to the Spring peak might contribute to a more focused conduct of body donation awareness in Türkiye.

Keywords

• body donation
• body donation program
• donor recruitment
• registration
• Türkiye

References

1. Arráez-Aybar LA, Sánchez-Montesinos I, Mirapeix RM, Mompeo-Corredera B, Sañudo-Tejero JR. Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice. Ann Anat 2010;192:341–8.
2. Cook MS, Kernahan PJ. An unembalmed cadaveric preparation for simulating pleural effusion: a pilot study of chest percussion involving medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10:160–9.
3. Kumar Ghosh S, Kumar A. Building professionalism in human dissection room as a component of hidden curriculum delivery: a systematic review of good practices. Anat Sci Educ 2019;12:210–21.
4. Lempp HK. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Med Educ 2005;39:318–25.
5. Gürses İA, Coşkun O, Öztürk A. Current status of cadaver sources in Turkey and a wake-up call for Turkish anatomists. Anat Sci Educ 2018;11:155–65.
6. Habicht JL, Kiessling C, Winkelmann A. Bodies for anatomy education in medical schools: an overview of the sources of cadavers worldwide. Acad Med 2018;93:1293–300.
7. Biasutto SN, Sharma NA, Weiglein AH, Benia FM, McBride J, Bueno-Lopez JL, Kramer B, Blyth P, Barros MD, Ashiru O, Ballesteros LE, Moxham BJ, Krishnan S. Human bodies to teach anatomy: importance and procurement - experience with cadaver donation. Revistata Argentina de Anatomia Clinica 2014;6:72–86.
8. Erdoğan K, Özen K, Yildiz H, Malas MA. Assessment of awareness, knowledge and attitudes about the importance of cadaver and cadaver donation: Report of Izmir, Turkey. International Journal of Morphology 2020;38:831–7.

9. Gürses İA, Ertaş A, Gürtekin B, Coşkun O, Üzel M, Gayretli Ö, Demirci MS. Profile and motivations of registered whole-body donors in Turkey: Istanbul University experience. Anat Sci Educ 2019;12:370–85.
10. Kurtoğlu Olgunus Z, Yeşil Kayabaşı Ç. Evaluation of knowledge and attitudes of physicians in Turkey about body donation processes. Anatomy 2021;15:152–62.
11. Ok F, Gürses İA. Evaluation of information on body donation promotion at official websites of Turkish anatomy departments. Anat Sci Educ 2021;14:816–827.
12. Bolt S, Eisinga R, Venbrux E, Kuks JBM, Gerrits PO. Personality and motivation for body donation. Ann Anat 2011;193:112–7.
13. Cornwall J, Poppelwell Z, McManus R. “Why did you really do it?” A mixed-method analysis of the factors underpinning motivations to register as a body donor. Anat Sci Educ 2018;11:623–31.
14. Richardson R, Hurwitz B. Donors’ attitudes towards body donation for dissection. Lancet 1995;346:277–9.
15. Delaney MF, White KM. Predicting people’s intention to donate their body to medical science and research. J Soc Psychol 2015;155:221–37.
16. Anteby M, Garip F, Martorana PV, Lozanoff S. Individuals’ decision to co-donate or donate alone: an archival study of married whole body donors in Hawaii. PLoS One 2012;7:e42673.
17. Asad AL, Anteby M, Garip F. Who donates their bodies to science? The combined role of gender and migration status among California whole-body donors. Soc Sci Med 2014;106:53–8.
18. Bolt S, Venbrux E, Eisinga R, Kuks JBM, Veening JG, Gerrits PO. Motivation for body donation to science: more than an altruistic act. Ann Anat 2010;92:70–4.
19. Cornwall J, Perry GF, Louw G, Stringer MD. Who donates their body to science? An international, multicenter, prospective study. Anat Sci Educ 2012;5:208–16.
20. Techataweewan N, Panthongviriyakul C, Toomsan Y, Mothong W, Kanla P, Chaichun A, Amarttayakong P, Tayles N. Human body donation in Thailand: donors at Khon Kaen University. Ann Anat 2018;216:142–51.
21. Kramer B, Hutchinson EF. Transformation of a cadaver population: analysis of a South African cadaver program, 1921–2013. Anat Sci Educ 2015;8:445–51.
22. Olejaz M, Hoeyer K. Meet the donors: a qualitative analysis of what donation means to Danish whole body donors. European Journal of Anatomy 2016;20:19–29.
23. Cornwall J. Annual variation of body donor registrations in New Zealand. Eur J Anat 2014;18:55–9.
24. Wirz-Justice A. Biological rhythm disturbances in mood disorders. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2006;21:S11–5.
25. Hiltunen L, Suominen K, Lönnqvist J, Partonen T. Relationship between daylength and suicide in Finland. J Circadian Rhythms 2011;9:1–12
26. Postolache TT, Mortensen PB, Tonelli LH, Jiao X, Frangakis C, Soriano JJ, Qin P. Seasonal spring peaks of suicide in victims with and without prior history of hospitalization for mood disorders. J Affect Disord 2010;121:88–93.
27. Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy. TAKAD 2013 Türkiye’de kadavra sorunu ve çözüm önerileri. [Internet]. [Retrieved on December 13, 2018]. Available from: http://www.anatomidernegi.org.tr/belgeler
28. Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy. Ulusal anatomi haftası basın bildirgesi. [Internet]. [Retrieved on December 13, 2018]. Available from: http://www.anatomidernegi.org.tr/belgeler
29. Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy. Beden bağışı bilgilendirme. [Internet]. [Retrieved on December 13, 2018]. Available from: http://www.anatomidernegi.org.tr/belgeler
30. Çubukçu B. Kadavrasız anatomi dersi. [Internet]. [Retrieved on December 13, 2018] Available from: http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/al-jazeera-ozel/kadavrasiz-anatomi-dersi
31. Anadolu Ajansı. Eğitime bağışlanan kadavra 8 yıl sonra toprağa verildi. [Internet]. [Retrieved on December 13, 2018]. Available from: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/saglik/egitime-bagislanan-kadavra-8-yil-sonra-torenle-topraga-verildi/1670703
32. Kumar Ghosh S. Paying respect to human cadavers: we owe this to the first teacher in anatomy. Ann Anat 2017;211:129–34.
33. Kumar Ghosh S. The practice of ethics in the context of human dissection: setting standards for future physicians. Ann Anat 2020;232:151577.
34. Jones DG. Searching for good practice recommendations on body donation across diverse cultures. Clin Anat 2016;29:55–9.
35. El-Haddad J, Prvan T, Štrkalj G. Attitudes of anatomy students toward commemorations for body donors: a multicultural perspective. Anat Sci Educ 2021;14:89–98.
36. Crow SM, O’Donoghue D, Vannatta JB, Thompson BM. Meeting the family: promoting humanism in gross anatomy. Teach Learn Med 2012;24:49–54.
37. da Rocha AO, Maués JL, Chies GAF, da Silva AP. Assessing the impact of a ceremony in honor of the body donors in the development of ethical and humanistic attitudes among medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2020;13:467–74.
38. Jones TW, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Honoring our donors: a survey of memorial ceremonies in United States anatomy programs. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7:219–223.
39. Park JT, Jang Y, Park MS, Pae C, Park J, Hu KS, Park JS, Han SH, Koh KS, Kim HJ. The trend of body donation for education based on Korean social and religious culture. Anat Sci Educ 2011;4:33–8.
40. Talarico EF Jr. A change in paradigm: giving back identity to donors in the anatomy laboratory. Clin Anat 2013;26:161–72.
41. Halliday NL, Moon MB, O’Donoghue DL, Thompson BM, Crow SM. Transformation and closure for anatomical donor families that meet medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2019;12:399–406.
42. Jiang J, Chen Q, Zhang M, Hong T, Huang K, Meng H, Ding J, Zhang L. Effects of commemorations and postdonation services on public willingness to donate bodies in China. Anat Sci Educ 2020;13:218–29.