EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS, EXERCISE AND SMOKING ON MORPHOMETRY OF HUMAN ACHILLES TENDON: AN ULTRASOUND STUDY

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to reveal the normal morphometric values of Achilles tendon using ultrasound (US) imaging in subjects of different gender, age groups, smoking status, and physical exercise habits.
Methods: A total of 342 Achilles tendons were examined in the 171 volunteers (69 females, 102 males) with different age, gender, weight, height, smoking and physical exercise habits. Achilles tendon width, length, thickness, cross-sectional area and length were measured using a commercial ultrasound machine with a 9-15 mHz linear-array transducer.
Results: The average width, thickness, cross-sectional area and length of the Achilles tendon in male subjects were significantly higher than females. Tendon width, thickness, cross-sectional area and length showed no significant difference between the right and left side. With the exception of the left Achilles tendon thickness, measurements taken for non-smoking subjects were larger than smokers. Achilles tendon measurements of subjects engaged in sportive activities were significantly larger than those with sedentary lifestyle Weight and body mass index were the only anthropometric measurements in correlation with Achilles tendon size.
Conclusion: Achilles tendon size varies with age, gender, physical activity and smoking habits. The measurements presented in this study give normal variations of the tendon’s morphologic characteristics, which will be of use in clinical diagnosis.

Keywords

• Achilles tendon
• anthropometry
• exercise
• smoking
• ultrasound

References

1. Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:613–25.
2. Koivunen-Niemelä T, Parkkola K. Anatomy of the Achilles tendon (tendo calcaneus) with respect to tendon thickness measurements.
3. Surg Radiol Anat 1995;17:263–8.
4. Levangie P, Norkin C. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive
5. analysis. 5th ed. New Delhi; Jaypee Brothers; 2011. Chapter
6. , The ankle and foot complex; p. 440–82.
7. Maffuli N, Almekinders LC. The Achilles tendon. London: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 36.
8. Apayd›n N, Ünlü S, Bozkurt M, Doral MN. Functional anatomy and biomechanical aspects of the Achilles tendon. [Article in Turkish]

9. TOTB‹D Dergisi 2011;10:61–8.
10. Mow VC, Huiskes R. Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechanobiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p.
11. –41.
12. Fredberg U, Bolvig L, Andersen NT, Stengaard-Pedersen K.
13. Ultrasonography in evaluation of Achilles and patella tendon
14. thickness. Ultraschall Med 2008;29:60–5.
15. Nehrer S, Breitenseher M, Brodner W, Kainberger F, Fellinger
16. EJ, Engel A, Imhof F. Clinical and sonographic evaluation of the
17. risk of rupture in the Achilles tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
18. ;116:14–8.
19. Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kannus P, Józsa L, Järvinen M. Collagen
20. fibres of the spontaneously ruptured human tendons display
21. decreased thickness and crimp angle. J Orthop Res 2004;22:1303–9.
22. Eriksen HA, Pajala A, Leppilahti J, Risteli J. Increased content of
23. type III collagen at the rupture site of human Achilles tendon. J
24. Orthop Res 2002;20:1352–7.
25. Karjalainen PT, Soila K, Aronen HJ, Pihlajamäki HK, Tynninen
26. O, Paavonen T, Tirman PF. MR imaging of overuse injuries of the
27. Achilles tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:251–60.
28. O'Connor PJ, Grainger AJ, Morgan SR, Smith KL, Waterton JC,
29. Nash AF. Ultrasound assessment of tendons in asymptomatic volunteers:
30. a study of reproducibility. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1968–73.
31. Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A, Cervini C. Sonographic imaging
32. of tendons. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:969–76.
33. van Schie HT, de Vos RJ, de Jonge S, Bakker EM, Heijboer MP,
34. Verhaar JA, Tol JL, Weinans H. Ultrasonographic tissue characterisation
35. of human Achilles tendons: quantification of tendon
36. structure through a novel non-invasive approach. Br J Sports Med
37. ;44:1153–9.
38. Fahlström M, Alfredson H. Ultrasound and Doppler findings in the
39. Achilles tendon among middle-aged recreational floor-ball players
40. in direct relation to a match. Br J Sports Med 2010;44:140– 3.
41. Mabuchi H, Tatami R, Haba T, Ueda K, Ueda R, Ito S, Karnetani
42. T, Koizurni J, Miyamoto S, Ohta M, Takeda R, Takegoshi T,
43. Takeshita H. Achilles tendon thickness and ischemic heart disease
44. in familial hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism 1978;27:1672–9.
45. Pang BS, Ying M. Sonographic measurement of achilles tendons in
46. asymptomatic subjects: variation with age, body height, and dominance
47. of ankle. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:1291–6.
48. Kallinen M, Suominen H. Ultrasonographic measurements of the
49. Achilles tendon in elderly athletes and sedentary men. Acta Radiol
50. ;35:560–3.
51. Muraoka T, Muramatsu T, Fukunaga T, Kanehisa H. Elastic
52. properties of human Achilles tendon are correlated to muscle
53. strength. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2005;99:665–9.
54. Egwu O, Njoku CO, Ukoha UU, Eteudo AN, Elem BC. Calf muscle
55. (triceps surae complex) thickness in an adult Nigerian population:
56. an imaging based normographic study. Macedonian Journal of
57. Medical Sciences 2013;6:146–52.
58. Finni T, Kovanen V, Ronkainen PH, Pöllänen E, Bashford GR,
59. Kaprio J, Alén M, Kujala UM, Sipilä S. Combination of hormone
60. replacement therapy and high physical activity is associated with differences
61. in Achilles tendon size in monozygotic female twin pairs. J
62. Appl Physiol (1985) 2009;106:1332–7.
63. Bohm S, Mersmann F, Marzilger R, Schroll A, Arampatzis A.
64. Asymmetry of Achilles tendon mechanical and morphological
65. properties between both legs. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015;25:
66. e124–32.
67. Egwu OA, Ogbonna CO, Salami E, Eni OE, Besong E, Onwe CC.
68. Normal thickness of the tendo calcaneus (TCT) in an adult
69. Nigerian population: an imaging based normographic study. Br J
70. Med Med Res 2014;4:2100–11.
71. Balius R, Alomar X, Rodas G, Miguel-Pérez M, Pedret C, Dobado
72. MC, Blasi J, Koulouris G. The soleus muscle: MRI, anatomic and
73. histologic findings in cadavers with clinical correlation of strain
74. injury distribution. Skeletal Radiol 2013;42:521–30.
75. Egwu OA, Anibeze CIP, Akpuaka FC, Udoh BE. Activity related
76. differences in the thickness of achilles tendon among four different
77. occupational groups in nigeria: an ultrasound based study.
78. Bangladesh J Med Sci 2012;11:103–11.
79. Mathieson JR, Connell DG, Cooperberg PL, Lloyd-Smith DR.
80. Sonography of the Achilles tendon and adjacent bursae. AJR Am J
81. Roentgenol 1988;151:127–31.
82. Civeira F, Castillo JJ, Calvo C, Ferrando J, de Pedro C, Martínez-
83. Rodés P, Pocoví M. Achilles tendon size by high resolution sonography
84. in healthy population. Relationship with lipid levels. Med
85. Clin (Barc) 1998;111:41–4.
86. Cook JL, Khan KM, Harcourt PR, Kiss ZS, Fehrmann MW,
87. Griffiths L, Wark JD. Patellar tendon ultrasonography in asymptomatic
88. active athletes reveals hypoechoic regions: a study of 320
89. tendons. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Clin J
90. Sport Med 1998;8:73–7.
91. Cook JL, Khan KM, Kiss ZS, Coleman BD, Griffiths L.
92. Asymptomatic hypoechoic regions on patellar tendon ultrasound:
93. A 4-year clinical and ultrasound followup of 46 tendons. Scand J
94. Med Sci Sports 2001;11:321–7.
95. Cook JL, Khan KM, Kiss ZS, Purdam CR, Griffiths L. Prospective
96. imaging study of asymptomatic patellar tendinopathy in elite junior
97. basketball players. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:473–9.
98. Kongsgaard M, Aagaard P, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP. Structural
99. Achilles tendon properties in athletes subjected to different exercise
100. modes and in Achilles tendon rupture patients. J Appl Physiol
101. ;99:1965–71.
102. Rosager S, Aagaard P, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Neergaard K, Kjaer M,
103. Magnusson SP. Load-displacement properties of the human triceps
104. surae aponeurosis and tendon in runners and non-runners.
105. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2002;12:90–8.
106. Unal B, Bilgili MYK, Y›lmaz S, Caglayan O, Kara S. Smoking prevents
107. the expected postprandial increase in intestinal blood flow. J
108. Ultrasound Med 2004;23:647–53.
109. Jacobovicz J, Tolazzi AR, Timi JR. Doppler ultrasound evaluation
110. of facial transverse and infraorbital arteries: influence of smoking
111. and aging process. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007;31:526–31.
112. Maffulli N, Ewen SW, Waterston SW, Reaper J, Barrass V.
113. Tenocytes from ruptured and tendinopathic achilles tendons produce
114. greater quantities of type III collagen than tenocytes from
115. normal achilles tendons. An in vitro model of human tendon healing.
116. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:499–505.
117. Whittaker P, Canham PB. Demonstration of quantitative fabric
118. analysis of tendon collagen using two-dimensional polarized light
119. microscopy. Matrix 1991;11:56–62.
120. Jorgensen LN, Kallehave F, Christensen E, Siana JE, Gottrup F.
121. Less collagen production in smokers. Surgery 1998;12:450–5.
122. Birk DE, Mayne R. Localization of collagen types I, III and V during
123. tendon development. Changes in collagen types I and III are correlated
124. with changes in fibril diameter. Eur J Cell Biol 1997;72: 352–61.
125. Stenroth L, Peltonen J, Cronin NJ, Sipilä S, Finni T. Age-related
126. differences in Achilles tendon properties and triceps surae muscle
127. architecture in vivo. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2012;113:1537–44.
128. Magnusson SP, Beyer N, Abrahamsen H, Aagaard P, Neergaard
129. K, Kjaer M. Increased cross-sectional area and reduced tensile
130. stress of the Achilles tendon in elderly compared with young
131. women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:123–7.
132. Kinugasa R, Hodgson JA, Edgerton VR, Shin DD, Sinha S.
133. Reduction in tendon elasticity from unloading is unrelated to its
134. hypertrophy. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2010;109:870–7.