Reporting detailed information and acknowledging donor-cadavers: good practice recommendation for anatomists
Abstract
Objectives: In order to facilitate a healthy and trusting relationship between anatomists and their society, appreciating the anatomical gift of the individuals that donated their bodies to science in every way possible remains central. Apart from memorial services and monuments, scientific articles themselves can be a good platform to show this appreciation. In this article, we aimed to an create and awareness among anatomists and researchers by evaluating the information given regarding donor-cadavers in their articles and see if they acknowledged them.
Methods: We evaluated all articles that used human cadaveric specimens by Turkish anatomists published between January 2011 and April 2016 and assessed if researchers provided data on the age, gender, preservation technique(s), source, and ethical / legal permissions regarding the cadavers used.
Results: Majority of the articles provided data about gender (74.5%) and age (68.9%). Preservation technique (56.6%) and source of specimens (50.5%) were reported less frequently. While 28.3% of the articles provided data on some form of ethical approval, only 11.8% of the articles provided data on the consent of the individuals. Ten (4.7%) articles acknowledged the cadavers and/or their families.
Conclusion: We believe it is the duty of anatomists to promote body donation within their society by building a trustworthy relationship. Scientific articles that depend on donor-cadavers should also be used to promote this relationship. Therefore, awareness among anatomists should be raised to discuss ethical grounds for scientific research on cadavers.
Keywords
References
- 1. Dyer GSM, Thorndike EL. Quidne mortui vivos docent? The evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Acad Med 2000;75:969–70.
- 2. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007;41:15–22.
- 3. Hildebrandt S. What is happening in our anatomical dissection rooms? Clin Anat 2014;27:833–4.
- 4. Lemmp HK. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Med Educ 2005;39:318–25.
- 5. Winkelmann A, Heinze AK, Hendrix S. Acknowledging tissue donation: human cadaveric specimens in musculoskeletal research. Clin Anat 2016;29:65–9.
- 6. Jones TW, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Honoring our donors: a survey of memorial ceremonies in United States anatomy programs. Anat Sci Educ 2013;7:219–23.
- 7. Subasinghe SK, Jones DG. Human body donation programs in Sri Lanka: Buddhist perspectives. Anat Sci Educ 2015;8:484–9.
- 8. Bohl M, Holman A, Mueller DA, Gruppen LD, Hildebrandt S. The willed body donor interview project: medical student and donor expectations. Anat Sci Educ 2012;6:90–100.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
İlke Ali Gürses
Department of Anatomy, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul
Türkiye
Esranur Korkmaz
Department of Anatomy, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul
Türkiye
Adnan Öztürk
This is me
Department of Anatomy, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 30, 2016
Submission Date
May 24, 2017
Acceptance Date
September 11, 2016
Published in Issue
Year 2016 Volume: 10 Number: 3