Distance education during social isolation: an evaluation of student attitudes and perceptions using the web-based learning environment instrument (WEBLEI)

Abstract

Objectives: Until recently, distance education at universities has supplemented face-to-face education in blended programs that combine the two. But during the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of the 2019–2020 academic year, many universities were forced to conduct distance education exclusively. The aim of this study is to determine the perceptions, thoughts, and experiences of university students regarding the completely online process of distance education during this period. Methods: In this process, all theoretical lessons and exams were conducted on the advance learning management system (ALMS) for distance education at İstinye University. The present study used the original form of WEBLEI to survey 324 students from medicine, pharmacy and health science departments at İstinye University. Results: WEBLEI measures students’ perceptions using four scales: access, interaction, response and results. Though students did not experience problems accessing online lessons or interacting with their teachers and other students, they did not find online distance education alone more effective and satisfying than combined with face-to-face education. Conclusion: This study contributes to a better understanding of the pros and cons of distance education by evaluating the attitudes and perceptions of university students.

Keywords

• distance education
• online lessons
• social isolation
• WEBLEI
• web-based learning

References

1. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: about MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster. Business Horizons 2016;59:441–50.
2. Cleveland-Innes MF, Garrison DR. Introduction to distance education: understanding teaching and learning in a new era. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2010. p. 296.
3. Allen IE, Seaman J. Staying the course. Online education in the United States, 2008. Newburyport (MA): Sloan Consortium (NJ1); 2008. p. 28.
4. Bernard RM, Brauer A, Abrami PC, Surkes M. The development of a questionnaire for predicting online learning achievement. Distance Education 2004;25:31–47.
5. Singh P. Unleashing the potential of ODL - reaching the unreached. Proceedings of the International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE) International Conference, 2017.
6. Young JR. “Hybrid” teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education 2002; 48:33–4.
7. Lloyd-Smith L. Exploring the advantages of blended instruction at community colleges and technical schools. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 2010;6:508–15.
8. Dantas AM, Kemm RE. A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component. Adv Physiol Educ 2008;32:65–75.

9. Joynes V, Fuller R. Legitimisation, personalisation and maturation: using the experiences of a compulsory mobile curriculum to reconceptualise mobile learning. Med Teach 2016;38:621–7.
10. Kirtman L. Online versus in-class courses: an examination of differences in learning outcomes. Issues in Teacher Education 2009;18: 103–16.
11. Gould T. Hybrid classes?: maximizing institutional resources and student learning. Proceedings of the 2003 Association Supporting Computer Uses in Education (ASCUE) Conference, 2003;54–9.
12. Distance learning task force 2007. Quality issues in distance learning. AACSB International-The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. [Internet]. [Retrieved on January 13, 2021]. Available from: https://numerons.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/16quality-issues-in-distance-learning.pdf
13. Green RA, Whitburn LY. Impact of introduction of blended learning in gross anatomy on student outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9: 422–30.
14. Mathiowetz V, Yu CH, Quake-Rapp C. Comparison of a gross anatomy laboratory to online anatomy software for teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9:52–9.
15. Swinnerton BJ, Morris NP, Hotchkiss S, Pickering JD. The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10:53–67.
16. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020;55:105924.
17. Epidemiology Group of New Coronavirus Pneumonia Emergency Response Mechanism, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2020;41:145–51.
18. Thomas E. Coronavirus: impact on young people with mental health needs. YoungMinds. Survey 2; 2020. [Internet]. [Retrieved on January 13, 2021]. Available from: https://www.youngminds.org.uk/media/ 355gyqcd/coronavirus-report-summer-2020-final.pdf
19. Chandra V, Fisher D, Chang V. Investigating higher education and secondary school web-based learning environments using the WEBLEI. In: Le T, Le Q, editors. Technologies for enhancing pedagogy, engagement and empowerment in education: creating learning-friendly environments. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2011. p. 93–104.
20. Chang V, Fisher D. The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In: Khine MS, Fisher D, editors. Technology-rich learning environments: a future perspective. River Edge (NJ): World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.; 2003. p. 1–20.
21. Klibanov OM, Dolder C, Anderson K, Kehr HA, Woods JA. Impact of distance education via interactive videoconferencing on students’ course performance and satisfaction. Adv Physiol Educ 2018;42:21– 5.
22. Sheryl A, Catura LS, Cruz JS Dela. E-learning effectiveness as inputs for a learning management system framework and policy. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 2019;7:112–7.
23. Dyrbye L, Cumyn A, Day H, Heflin M. A qualitative study of physicians’ experiences with online learning in a masters degree program: Benefits, challenges, and proposed solutions. Med Teach 2009;31: 40–6.
24. Horzum MB. Sakarya Üniversitesi eğitim fakültesinde görev yapan öğretim elemanlarının internet destekli eğitime yönelik düşünceleri. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2003;0:246–62.
25. Ilahi CW, Rizky DAF, Wibawa AP, Nugraha E. Blended learning in postgraduate program. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology: theory and application of it for education, industry and society in big data era (ICSITECH), 2017;503–6.
26. Chandra V, Fisher DL. Assessing the effectiveness of a blended web-based learning environment in an Australian high school. In: Fisher D, Khine MS, editors. Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: worldviews. Hackensack (NJ): World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.; 2006. p. 461–78.