RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF AGE FROM EPIPHYSEAL FUSION AT THE KNEE JOINT

Year 2016, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 01.05.2016

Oladunni Abimbola Ebeye Dennis Erhisenebe Eboh Nwabueze Stephen Onyia

Abstract

Objectives: Age determination is needed in administration of justice, employment, marriage, forensic investigation and identification. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relationship between stages of epiphyseal union at the knee joint and chronological age.
Methods: Anterior posterior and lateral knee radiographs of 100 males and 110 females aged 9–19 years were examined. Epiphyseal union was divided into five specific stages in the femur, tibia and fibula. Fusion was scored as stage 0: non-union,stage 1: beginning union, stage 2: active union, stage 3: recent union, and stage 4: complete union.
Results: Mean age gradually increased with each stage of union and varied between males and females. A statistically significant difference in mean age was recorded between stages for the three epiphyses. Epiphyseal union occurred earlier in females than in males. A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean age of union for males and females for stages 1 and 2 for the femur, and stages 0, 1, 2 and 3 for the tibia and fibula.
Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that radiographic analysis of the knee is a valuable alternative for estimation of chronological age.

Keywords

age estimation, epiphysis, fusion, knee joint, radiograph, skeletal maturation

References

• Dharmesh SP, Harish A, Jigesh VS. Epiphyseal fusion at lower end
• of radius and ulna valuable tool for age determination. Journal of
• Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine 2011;33:31–35.
• Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L, Ramsthaler F, Prieto J, Schuliar Y,
• Lynnerup N, Cattaneo C. The problem of ageing human remains
• and living individuals: a review. Forensic Sci Int 2009;193:1–13.
• Cameriere R, Cingolani M, Giuliodori A, De Luca S, Ferrante L.
• Radiographic analysis of epiphyseal fusion at knee joint to assess likelihood
• of having attained 18 years of age. Int J Legal Med 2012;126:
• –99.
• Swapnil P, Bipinchandra T, Varsha P. Age estimation by radiological
• assessment of proximal tibial epiphysis. Al Ameen Journal of
• Medical Sciences 2015;8:144–9.
• Nemade KS, Kamdi NY, Meshram MM, Parchand MP. A radiological
• study of epiphyseal union of knee joint for age estimation. Indian
• Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology 2012;6:68–72.
• Acheson RM. A method of assessing skeletal maturity from radiographs.
• A report from the Oxford child health survey. J Anat 1954;
• :498–508.
• Stevenson PH. Age order of epiphyseal union in man. Am J Phys
• Anthropol 1953;7:53–93.
• Ubelaker DH. The estimation of age at death from immature human
• bone. In: Iscan MY, editor. Age markers in the human skeleton.
• Springfield (IL): Charles C Thomas; 1989. p. 57–70.
• Banerjee KK, Agarwal BBL. Estimation of age from epiphyseal
• union at the wrist and ankle joints in the capital city of India.
• Forensic Sci Int 1998;98:31–9.
• Schaefer MC, Black SM. Comparison of ages of epiphyseal union in
• North American and Bosnian skeletal material. Forensic Sci Int
• ;50:777–84.
• Eveleth P. Tanner JM. Worldwide variation in human growth. 2.
• Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
• Grelich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of
• the hand and wrist. Stanford (CA): Standford University Press; 1959.
• Lee MMC. Problems in combining skeletal age for an individual.
• Am J Phys Anthropol 1971;35:395–8.
• O’Connor JE, Bogue C, Spence LD, Last J. A method to establish
• the relationship between chronological age and stage of union from
• radiographic assessment of epiphyseal fusion at the knee: an Irish
• population study. J Anat 2008;212:198–209.
• Roche AF, Roberts J, Hamill PVV. Skeletal maturity of children 6-
• years: racial, geographic area and socioeconomic differentials,
• United States. Vital Health Stat 11 1975;149:1–81.
• Stevenson PH. Age order of epiphyseal union in man. Am J Phys
• Anthropol 1925;7:53–93.
• Davies DA, Parsons FG. The age order of the appearance and
• union of the normal epiphyses as seen by X-rays. J Anat 1927;62:
• –71.
• Paterson RS. A radiological investigation of the epiphyses of the long
• bones. J Anat 1929;64:28–46.
• Flecker H. Roentgenographic observations of the times of appearance
• of epiphyses and their fusion with the diaphyses. J Anat 1932;67:
• –64.
• Pillai MJS. The study of epiphyseal union for determination of age
• of South Indians. Ind J Med Res 1936;23:1015–7.
• Galstaun G. A study of ossification as observed in Indian subjects.
• Indian J Med Res 1937;25:267–324.
• Flecker H. Time of appearance and fusion of ossification centres as
• observed by roentgenographic methods. Am J Roentgenol 1942;47:
• –159.
• Aggarwal ML, Pathak IC. Roentgenologic study of epiphyseal union
• in Punjabi girls for determination of age. Indian J Med Res
• ;45:283–9.
• McKern TW, Stewart TD. Skeletal age changes in young American
• males, analysed from the standpoint of age identification. Natick
• (MA): Headquarters Quartermaster Research and Development
• Command, Technical Report EP-45; 1957.
• Johnston FE. Sequence of epiphyseal union in a prehistoric
• Kentucky population from Indian Knoll. Hum Biol 1961;33:66–81.
• Hansman CF. Appearance and fusion of ossification centers in the
• human skeleton. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1962;88:
• –82.
• Saksena JS, Vyas SK. Epiphysial union at wrist, knee and iliac crest
• in resident of Madhya Pradessh. J Indian Med Assoc 1969;53:67–8.
• Das Gupta SM, Prasad V, Singh S. A roentgenologic study of epiphyseal
• union around elbow, wrist and knee joints and the pelvis in
• boys and girls of Uttar Pradesh. J Indian Med Assoc 1974;62:10–2.
• Bipinchandra T, Swapnil P, Pankaj M, Ninad N. A radiological
• study of age estimation from epiphyseal fusion of distal end of femur
• in the central India population. Journal of Indian Academy of
• Forensic Medicine 2015;37:8–11.
• Mellits ED, Dorst JP, Cheek DB. Bone age: it’s contribution to the
• prediction of maturational or biological age. Am J Phys Anthropol
• ;35:381–4.
• Narayan D, Bajaj ID. Ages of epiphyseal union in long bones of inferior
• extremity in U.P. subjects. Indian J Med Res 1957;45:645–9.
• Bokariya P, Chowdhary DS, Tirpude BH, Kothari R, Waghmare JE,
• Tamekar A. A review of the chronology of epiphyseal union in the
• bones at knee and ankle joint. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic
• Medicine 2011;33:258–60.