The relationship between the carotid canal and mandibular condyle: an anatomical study with application to surgical approaches to the skull base via the infratemporal fossa

Year 2016, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 193 - 199, 30.12.2016

Fernando Alonso Shenell Bernard Paul A. Irwin R. Isaiah Tubbs Joe Iwanaga Marios Loukas Rod J. Oskouian R. Shane Tubbs

Abstract

Objectives: To review the relationship of the internal carotid artery, and carotid canal to the mandibular condyle, specifically from an infratemporal fossa approach. Skull base procedures which involve the middle cranial fossa utilize an infratemporal fossa approach either as the primary or adjunct surgical approach often performed with access osteotomies. In these surgeries, injury to the internal carotid artery and carotid canal may occur leading to many vascular complications ranging from internal carotid artery transection and thrombosis to embolism of distal communicating segments. Hence, knowing the relationship of these important structures is of utmost importance for skull base surgeons. In addition, the necessity for this knowledge is critical for clinicians to be able to understand the mechanism by which medial displacement of the mandibular condyle may cause blunt internal carotid artery injury in the evaluation of trauma patients. Identification of these structures and understanding their relationship on imaging may be used in the decision process to perform angiography based imaging.

Methods: Twenty dry skulls were utilized for a total of forty sides and the distance between the proximal carotid canal and the medial aspect of the mandibular condyle was measured.

Results: The average distance between the mandibular condyle and the carotid canal on right and left sided specimens was 1.03 cm and 1.11 cm, respectively. The length ranged from 0.2 cm to 1.7 cm. No significant differences were found between right and left sides.

Conclusion: A clear understanding of the anatomical relationship between the carotid canal and the head of the mandible, an easily identifiable landmark, is important for clinicians and surgeons alike. A substantial distance variability was observed in the samples studied. The understanding of this relationship should help identify patients at risk for ICA injury during surgical approaches and in the trauma setting.

Keywords

anatomy, infratemporal fossa, neurosurgery, skull base, vascular injury

References

• 1. Sanna M, Shin SH, Piazza P, Pasanisi E, Vitullo F, Di Lella F, Bacciu A. Infratemporal fossa approach type a with transcondylar-transtubercular extension for Fisch type C2 to C4 tympanojugular paragangliomas. Head Neck 2014;36:1581–8.
• 2. Sekhar LN, Schramm VL Jr, Jones NF, Yonas H, Horton J, Latchaw RE, Curtin H. Operative exposure and management of the petrous and upper cervical internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery 1986;19: 967–82.
• 3. Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT. Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 1996;38:425–33.
• 4. Smith NR. Surgical anatomy of the arteries: with plates and illustrations. Baltimore (MD): J. N. Toy and W. R. Lucas; 1835. p. 61–2.
• 5. Sekhar LN, Schramm VL, Jones NF. Subtemporal- preauricular infratemporal fossa approach to large lateral and posterior cranial base neoplasms. J Neurosurg 1987;67:488–99.
• 6. Lang J. Skull base and related structures: atlas of clinical anatomy. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1996. p. 60–180.
• 7. Bejjani GK, Sullivan B, Salas-Lopez E, Abello J, Wright DC, Jurjus A, Sekhar LN. Surgical anatomy of the infratemporal fossa: the styloid diaphragm revisited. Neurosurgery 1998;43:842-52; discussion 852–3.
• 8. Fisch U, Mattox D. Microsurgery of the skull base. New York (NY): Thieme Medical Publishers; 1988. p. 286–301.
• 9. Aslan A, Balyan FR, Taibah A, Sanna M. Anatomic relationships between surgical landmarks in type b and type c infratemporal fossa approaches. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1998;255:259–64.
• 10. Guo YX, Sun ZP, Liu XJ, Bhandari K, Guo CB. Surgical safety distances in the infratemporal fossa: three-dimensional measurement study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:555–61.
• 11. Urken ML, Biller HF, Haimov M. Intratemporal carotid artery bypass in resection of base of skull tumor. Laryngoscope 1985;95:1472–7.
• 12. Kawakami K, Kawamoto K, Tsuji H. Opening of the carotid canal in the skull base surgery: drilling of the carotid canal triangle. No Shinkei Geka 1993;21:1013–9.
• 13. Catalano PJ, Bederson J, Turk JB, Sen C, Biller HF. New approach for operative management of vascular lesions of the infratemporal internal carotid artery. Am J Otol 1994;15:495–501.
• 14. Mason E, Gurrola J 2nd, Reyes C, Brown JJ, Figueroa R, Solares CA. Analysis of the petrous portion of the internal carotid artery: landmarks for an endoscopic endonasal approach. Laryngoscope 2014;124:1988–94.
• 15. Sabit I, Schaefer SD, Couldwell WT. Modified infratemporal fossa approach via lateral transantral maxillotomy: a microsurgical model. Surg Neurol 2002;58:21–31.
• 16. Leonetti JP, Benscoter BJ, Marzo SJ, Borrowdale RW, Pontikis GC. Preauricular infratemporal fossa approach for advanced malignant parotid tumors. Laryngoscope 2012;122:1949–53.
• 17. Froelich SC, Abdel Aziz KM, Levine NB, Pensak ML, Theodosopoulos PV, Keller JT. Exposure of the distal cervical segment of the internal carotid artery using the trans-spinosum corridor: cadaveric study of surgical anatomy. Neurosurgery 2008;62: ONS354–61; discussion ONS361–2.
• 18. Suhardja AS, Cusimano MD, Agur AM. Surgical exposure and resection of the vertical portion of the petrous internal carotid artery: anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2001;49:665–9; discussion 669–70.
• 19. Voris HC. Complications of ligation of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 1951;8:119–31.
• 20. Wang H, Lanzino G, Kraus RR, Fraser KW. Provocative test occlusion or the matas test: who was rudolph matas? J Neurosurg 2003;98: 926–8.
• 21. Couldwell WT, Liu JK, Amini A, Kan P. Submandibular-infratemporal interpositional carotid artery bypass for cranial base tumors and giant aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006;59:ONS353–9; discussion ONS359–60.
• 22. Almefty K, Spetzler RF. Management of giant internal carotid artery aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2014;82:40–2.
• 23. Sanna M, Piazza P, De Donato G, Menozzi R, Falcioni M. Combined endovascular-surgical management of the internal carotid artery in complex tympanojugular paragangliomas. Skull Base 2009; 19:26–42.
• 24. Fisch U, Pillsbury HC. Infratemporal fossa approach to lesions in the temporal bone and base of the skull. Arch Otolaryngol 1979;105: 99–107.
• 25. Liu J, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Hirsch BE, Wang E. Eustachian tube and internal carotid artery in skull base surgery: an anatomical study. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2655–64.
• 26. Talebzadeh N, Rosenstein TP, Pogrel MA. Anatomy of the structures medial to the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:674–8.
• 27. Lawton MT, Spetzler RF. Internal carotid artery sacrifice for radical resection of skull base tumors. Skull Base Surg 1996;6:119–23.
• 28. Vranis NM, Mundinger GS, Bellamy JL, Schultz BD, Banda A, Yang R, Dorafshar AH, Christy MR, Rodriguez ED. Extracapsular mandibular condyle fractures are associated with severe blunt internal carotid artery injury: analysis of 605 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:811–21.
• 29. Maheshwari GU, Chauhan S, Kumar S, Krishnamoorthy S. Access osteotomy for infratemporal tumors: two case reports. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2012;2:77–81.
• 30. Ye ZX, Yang C, Chen MJ, Abdelrehem A. A novel approach to neoplasms medial to the condyle: a condylectomy with anterior displacement of the condyle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:427– 32.
• 31. Vilela MD, Rostomily RC. Temporomandibular joint-preserving preauricular subtemporal-infratemporal fossa approach: surgical technique and clinical application. Neurosurgery 2004;55:143–53; discussion 153–4.