Impact of a gynecologic oncology cadaveric dissection course for surgical training

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 56 - 60, 29.04.2019

İlker Selçuk Çağatay Barut Eray Çalışkan

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this study was to measure the educational efficacy of a gynecologic oncology cadaveric dissection
course on fellows and specialists.

Methods: After the radical and reconstructive vulvar and abdominal gynecologic cancer surgery cadaveric course, a post-course
survey was applied to evaluate the improvement in topographic surgical anatomy and the effect on broadening the surgical
experience.

Results: Totally 10 and 16 participants attended to the vulvar cancer surgery cadaveric dissection course and abdominal gynecologic cancer surgery cadaveric dissection course, respectively. All participants stated that they had an improvement in topographic surgical anatomy and they found the cadaveric workshop beneficial to broaden the surgical experience. All participants
suggested this kind of courses to learn the proper techniques of a surgical procedure in a comfortable and non-stressful setting
and improve the surgical skills for rare and complicated surgeries.

Conclusion: Cadaveric dissection courses in the field of gynecologic oncology tailor the surgical anatomy education and
improve the training

Anahtar Kelimeler

anatomy; cadaveric dissection; education; gynecologic oncology; surgery

Kaynakça

• 1. Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. Survey of clinicians’ attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin Anat 2005;18:380–4. 2. Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10:286–99. 3. Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:104–7. 4. Selcuk I, Tatar I, Huri E. Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2019;16:72–5. 5. Hu M, Wattchow D, de Fontgalland D. From ancient to avantgarde: a review of traditional and modern multimodal approaches to surgical anatomy education. ANZ J Surg 2018;88:146–51. 6. Sbayeh A, Qaedi Choo MA, Quane KA, Finucane P, McGrath D, O'Flynn S, O'Mahony SM, O'Tuathaigh CM. Relevance of anatomy to medical education and clinical practice: perspectives of medical students, clinicians, and educators. Perspect Med Educ 2016;5: 338–46. 7. Fitzgerald JE, White MJ, Tang SW, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, James DK. Are we teaching sufficient anatomy at medical school? The opinions of newly qualified doctors. Clin Anat 2008;21:718–24. 8. Wynn GR, Austin RCT, Motson RW. Using cadaveric simulation to introduce the concept and skills required to start performing transanal total mesorectal excision. Colorectal Dis 2018;20:496–501. 9. Takayesu JK, Peak D, Stearns D. Cadaver-based training is superior to simulation training for cricothyrotomy and tube thoracostomy. Intern Emerg Med 2017;12:99–102. 10. Gultekin M, Dursun P, Vranes B, Laky R, Bossart M, Grabowski JP, et al. Gynecologic oncology training systems in Europe: a report from the European network of young gynaecological oncologists. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011;21:1500–6. 11. Barton DP, Davies DC, Mahadevan V, Dennis L, Adib T, Mudan S, Sohaib A, Ellis H. Dissection of soft-preserved cadavers in the training of gynaecological oncologists: report of the first UK workshop. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:352–6. 12. Hammond I, Taylor J, Obermair A, McMenamin P. The anatomy of complications workshop: an educational strategy to improve the training and performance of fellows in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:769–73. 13. Hammond I, Taylor J, McMenamin P. Anatomy of Complications workshop: an educational strategy to improve performance in obstetricians and gynaecologists. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;43:111–4. 14. Heisler CA. Importance of adequate gross anatomy education: the impact of a structured pelvic anatomy course during gynecology fellowship. Anat Sci Educ 2011;4:302–4. 15. Kenton K, Mueller ER, Graziano S, Summers S, Rickey L, Oldham L, Pombar X, Turner F, Darrell B. Clinical anatomy and surgical skills training (CASST): development of a multicenter, multidisciplinary program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1789–93. 16. Corton MM, Wai CY, Vakili B, Boreham MK, Schaffer JI, Coleman RL. A comprehensive pelvic dissection course improves obstetrics and gynecology resident proficiency in surgical anatomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:647–51. 17. Connor RS, Dizon AM, Kimball KJ. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure: an effective, inexpensive, and durable teaching model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:706 e1–3. 18. Hamstra SJ, Dubrowski A, Backstein D. Teaching technical skills to surgical residents: a survey of empirical research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;(449):108–15. 19. Gilbody J, Prasthofer AW, Ho K, Costa ML. The use and effectiveness of cadaveric workshops in higher surgical training: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011;93:347–52. 20. Robinson DA, Piekut DT, Hasman L, Knight PA. Cadaveric Simulation training in cardiothoracic surgery: a systematic review. Anat Sci Educ 2019 Jun 24. doi: 10.1002/ase.1908.