Bibliometric analysis of the most cited one hundred anatomy articles in the 100th year of the Turkish Republic

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 19 - 24, 29.04.2024

Hanife Ertürk , Kenan Öztürk , İhsan Hız , Yadigar Kastamoni

Öz

Objectives: Bibliometric studies are the analysis of publications in the literature using statistical methods. In order to show the trending topics in the field of anatomy, the 100 most cited articles in the field of anatomy written by researchers from Turkey were analyzed using data obtained from Web of Science (WoS).
Methods: The data included in the study were collected by typing the word “anatomy” in the “all fields” category in the Web of Science database. Articles written by researchers from Turkey between 1980 and September 10, 2023 were included in the study. The data were transferred to the VOSviewer 1.6.19 program for detailed analysis and analyzes were performed.
Results: Of the 100 most cited articles, 33 were cadaveric studies, 25 were radiologic studies, 13 were clinical studies, 6 were animal experiments, 6 were morphometry studies, 4 were dry bone, 3 were fetal cadavers, 2 were editorial comments and 2 were anatomy education. Six articles were related to veterinary anatomy. Keyword analysis, author citatioya dan analysis, co-authorship analysis, country citation analysis, and institution citation analysis were also performed.
Conclusion: The bibliographic analysis of the 100 articles in our study will help anatomists to understand which topics they should study in their future anatomy studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

anatomy, attribution, bibliometric analysis, VOSviewer, Web of Science (WOS)

Kaynakça

• Tubbs RI, Gonzales J, Iwanaga J. The influence of ancient Greek thought on fifteenth century anatomy: Galenic influence and Leonardo da Vinci. Childs Nerv Syst 2018;34:1095–01.
• Dirik D, Eryılmaz İ, Erhan T. A Bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on post-truth. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review 2023;4:164–88.
• Hu Y, Yu Z, Cheng X, Luo Y, Wen C. A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical data mining research. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e20338.
• Petekkaya E. The most cited articles in anatomy: an update study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation 2019;4:6–13.
• Standring S. A brief history of topographical anatomy. J Anat 2016;229:32–62.
• Gürses IA, Gayretli O, Gurtekin B, Ozturk A. Publication rates and inconsistencies of the abstracts presented at the national anatomy congresses in 2007 and 2008. Balkan Med J 2017;34:64–70.
• Tellioglu AM, Karakas S, Polat AG. A survey of scientific publications in the field of anatomy conducted in Turkey during 2000–2014. Meandros Medical and Dental Journal 2015;16:1–3.
• Bahşi İ, Adanır SS, Kervancıoglu P, Orhan M, Govsa F. Bibliometric analysis of Turkey’s research activity in the anatomy and morphology category from the Web of Science database. European Journal of Therapeutics 2021;27:268–80.
• Adanır SS, Bahşi İ, Kervancıoğlu P, Orhan M, Cihan ÖF. Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018. Anatomy 2020;14:39–43.