Research Article

Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer's Disease

Volume: 5 Number: 3 October 27, 2026
Sevde Nur Yılmaz , Şeyma Yaşar *

Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Background: Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) regulate cholinergic neurotransmission and remain relevant targets for symptomatic treatment and ligand discovery in Alzheimer's disease. This study comparatively screened 16 phytochemicals from six medicinal plants against human AChE and BChE. Methods: Human AChE (PDB ID: 4EY7) and BChE (PDB ID: 6ESY) structures were prepared in AutoDockTools. Docking was conducted in AutoDock 4.2 using the Lamarckian genetic algorithm, 100 independent runs, and target-specific grids centred on the crystallographic binding pockets. Donepezil and galantamine were used as pharmacological comparators for AChE and BChE, respectively. Predicted physicochemical and drug-likeness properties were assessed with SwissADME. Results: Asiatic acid showed the most favourable predicted binding energy for AChE (−11.79 kcal/mol), close to donepezil (−11.65 kcal/mol). Withanolide A ranked first for BChE (−10.06 kcal/mol), followed by asiatic acid (−9.65 kcal/mol), madecassic acid (−9.12 kcal/mol), and asiaticoside (−9.08 kcal/mol), compared with galantamine (−6.74 kcal/mol). Interaction mapping suggested that asiatic acid occupied the catalytic gorge of both enzymes and formed hydrogen-bond, aromatic, and hydrophobic contacts with residues surrounding the binding pockets. Most compounds met Lipinski criteria; however, several highly ranked ligands were predicted not to cross the blood–brain barrier. Conclusions: The docking results identify asiatic acid, withanolide A, rosmarinic acid, and madecassic acid as candidates for experimental cholinesterase testing. Because docking scores do not establish biochemical inhibition or clinical efficacy, enzyme assays, selectivity testing, pharmacokinetic studies, and molecular-dynamics validation are required

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease, acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, AutoDock, phytochemical, drug-likeness

Ethical Statement

Not applicable. This study was based entirely on in silico analyses using publicly available molecular structure data and did not involve human participants, animals, biological samples, or personally identifiable information.

References

  1. [1] Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, Holstege H, Chételat G, Teunissen CE, et al. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1577–1590. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32205-4.
  2. [2] Yiannopoulou KG, Papageorgiou SG. Current and future treatments in Alzheimer disease: an update. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2020;12:1179573520907397. doi:10.1177/1179573520907397.
  3. [3] Mehta M, Adem A, Sabbagh M. New acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;2012:728983. doi:10.1155/2012/728983.
  4. [4] Giacobini E. Cholinesterases: new roles in brain function and in Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Res. 2003;28(3–4):515–522. doi:10.1023/A:1022869222652.
  5. [5] Darvesh S, Hopkins DA, Geula C. Neurobiology of butyrylcholinesterase. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(2):131–138. doi:10.1038/nrn1035.
  6. [6] Greig NH, Utsuki T, Ingram DK, Wang Y, Pepeu G, Scali C, et al. Selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibition elevates brain acetylcholine, augments learning and lowers Alzheimer beta-amyloid peptide in rodent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(47):17213–17218. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508575102.
  7. [7] Li Q, Yang H, Chen Y, Sun H. Recent progress in the identification of selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Med Chem. 2017;132:294–309. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.03.062.
  8. [8] Alhazmi HA, Albratty M. An update on the novel and approved drugs for Alzheimer disease. Saudi Pharm J. 2022;30(12):1755–1764. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2022.10.004.
  9. [9] Zheng XY, Zhang ZJ, Chou GX, Wu T, Cheng XM, Wang CH, et al. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory alkaloids from Peganum nigellastrum. Arch Pharm Res. 2009;32(9):1245–1251. doi:10.1007/s12272-009-1905-x.
  10. [10] Zhao T, Ding KM, Zhang L, Cheng XM, Wang CH, Wang ZT. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory alkaloids from Peganum nigellastrum Bunge. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:717232. doi:10.1155/2013/717232.
APA
Yılmaz, S. N., & Yaşar, Ş. (2026). Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease. Anatolian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5(3), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.71133/anatphar.2001143
AMA
1.Yılmaz SN, Yaşar Ş. Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease. AJPS. 2026;5(3):123-135. doi:10.71133/anatphar.2001143
Chicago
Yılmaz, Sevde Nur, and Şeyma Yaşar. 2026. “Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease”. Anatolian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 5 (3): 123-35. https://doi.org/10.71133/anatphar.2001143.
EndNote
Yılmaz SN, Yaşar Ş (October 1, 2026) Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease. Anatolian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 5 3 123–135.
IEEE
[1]S. N. Yılmaz and Ş. Yaşar, “Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease”, AJPS, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 123–135, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.71133/anatphar.2001143.
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Sevde Nur - Yaşar, Şeyma. “Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease”. Anatolian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 5/3 (October 1, 2026): 123-135. https://doi.org/10.71133/anatphar.2001143.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz SN, Yaşar Ş. Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease. AJPS. 2026;5:123–135.
MLA
Yılmaz, Sevde Nur, and Şeyma Yaşar. “Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease”. Anatolian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, Oct. 2026, pp. 123-35, doi:10.71133/anatphar.2001143.
Vancouver
1.Sevde Nur Yılmaz, Şeyma Yaşar. Molecular Docking Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Phytochemical Compounds Against Acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease. AJPS. 2026 Oct. 1;5(3):123-35. doi:10.71133/anatphar.2001143