Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Social drama in the context of political anthropology: The closure of Instagram

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 50, 48 - 59, 30.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.1607688

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine how the closure of social media platforms generates social tensions within the context of populist politics. The brief shutdown of Instagram in Turkey (August 2-10, 2024) serves as a case to understand transformations in social values and emerging societal polarizations. Utilizing Victor Turner’s social drama model, this study addresses how these social cases create states of polarization within society, gathering individuals around two opposing poles and legitimizing populist discourse. The study discusses how Instagram functions both as a status symbol and a tool for excluding the “other,” while also considering how questioning the platform’s functionality reshapes social norms. In this context, the effects of populism on social structure are analyzed through the lens of social drama.

Kaynakça

  • Ahmad, I. (2019). Populism: A political anthropology approach. Public Anthropologist, 1(2), 224-245. https://doi.org/10.1163/25891715-00102006
  • Akcay, U. (2018). Neoliberal populism in Turkey and its crisis. Akcay Ü (2018) Neoliberal populism in Turkey and its crisis. IPE Working Papers, 100.
  • Ali, I. (2021). Rituals of containment: Many pandemics, body politics, and social dramas during COVID-19 in Pakistan. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 648149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.648149
  • Arat-Koç, S. (2018). Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing ‘culture’:‘White’vs.‘Black Turks’ and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey. Dialectical Anthropology, 42(4), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-018-9500-2
  • Anadolu Ajansı. (2020). “Pakistan'da Kovid-19 kısıtlamalarının kalkmasıyla ölü ve vaka sayısı 8 kat arttı.” https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/pakistanda-kovid-19-kisitlamalarinin-kalkmasiyla-olu-ve-vaka-sayisi-8-kat-artti/1906844 (20.03.2025).
  • Artı Gerçek. (2024). “BTK, Instagram'a erişim engeli getirdi, kullanıcılardan tepki yağdı: 'Keyfi sansür uygulanıyor'.” https://artigercek.com/guncel/btk-instagrama-erisim-engeli-getirdi-kullanicilardan-tepki-yagdi-keyfi-sansur-313073h#google_vignette (04.10.2024).
  • Aytaç, S. E., ve Elçi, E. (2019). Populism in Turkey. Populism around the world: A comparative perspective, 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96758-5_6
  • Aytaç, S. E., ve Öniş, Z. (2014). Varieties of populism in a changing global context: The divergent paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo. Comparative Politics, 47(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041514813623137
  • Bamberg, M. (2020). Narrative analysis: An integrative approach. N. Mik-Meyer ve M. Järvinen (Der.), Qualitative analysis: Eight approaches for the social sciences, 243-264. Sage Publications.
  • Bardici, M. V. (2012). A discourse analysis of the media representation of social media for social change-The case of Egyptian revolution and political change.
  • BBC. (2024). “Türkiye’de Instagram engeli: ‘ciddi bir aşama kaydettik’.” https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/c4gvvvgdyxeo (04.10.2024).
  • Bianet. (2024). “Instagram’a erişim engeli.” https://bianet.org/haber/instagram-a-erisim-engeli-298129 (04.10.2024).
  • Bonikowski, B., ve Zhang, Y. (2023). Populism as dog-whistle politics: Anti-elite discourse and sentiments toward minority groups. Social Forces, 102(1), 180-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soac147
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.
  • Calhoun, K. (2023). Social Media. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://oxfordre.com/anthropology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.001.0001/acrefore-9780190854584-e-602&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744036145998380&usg=AOvVaw3Ts7hFERdAWeLoISLyuONW (04.10.2024).
  • Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists?. Journal of Political ideologies, 9(3), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263500
  • De la Torre, C. (2021). What do we mean by populism? H. Tumber ve S. Waisbord (Der.), Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism (ss. 29-37). Routledge.
  • Geismar, H., ve Knox, H. (2021). Digital anthropology (2. Basım.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087885
  • Guest, G., ve McLellan, E. (2003). Distinguishing the trees from the forest: Applying cluster analysis to thematic qualitative data. Field methods, 15(2), 186-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X03015002005
  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., ve Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
  • Gunitsky, S. (2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspectives on politics, 13(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714003120
  • Gusterson, H. (2017). From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American ethnologist, 44(2), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12469
  • Hawkins, K. A. (2018). The ideational approach. K. A. Hawkins (Der.), Routledge handbook of global populism (ss. 57-72). Routledge.
  • Howarth, D. (2015). Gramsci, hegemony and post-Marxism. M. McNally (Der.), Antonio Gramsci (ss. 195-213). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Karakaya, Y. (2020). The conquest of hearts: The central role of Ottoman nostalgia within contemporary Turkish populism. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8, 125-157. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-018-0065-y
  • Laclau, E. (1996). Why do empty signifiers matter to politics. Emancipation (s), 36(46). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474470919-047
  • Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. Verso.
  • Mamonova, N. (2021). Understanding the silent majority in authoritarian populism: What can we learn from popular support for Putin in rural Russia? I. Scoones (Der.), Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World (ss. 201-225). Routledge.
  • Mazzarella, W. (2019). The anthropology of populism: Beyond the liberal settlement. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011412
  • Miller, D. (2018). Digital anthropology. F. Stein (Der.), The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Facsimile of the first edition in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. http://doi.org/10.29164/18digital
  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso Books.
  • Mouffe, C. (2014). Feminism, citizenship, and radical democratic politics. L. Nicholson and S. Seidman (Der.), Feminist Social Thought (ss. 532-544). Routledge.
  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi. org/10.1111/j
  • Mudde, C., ve Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
  • Müller, J. W. (2015). Parsing populism: Who is and who is not a populist these days?. Juncture, 22(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2050-5876.2015.00842.x
  • Oksijen. (2023). “Erdoğan: Sosyal medyanın yaygınlaşmasıyla ahlaki açıdan ciddi bir yozlaşma yaşanıyor.” https://gazeteoksijen.com/turkiye/erdogan-sosyal-medyanin-yayginlasmasiyla-ahlaki-acidan-ciddi-bir-yozlasma-yasaniyor-197355 (04.10.2024).
  • Öniş, Z. (2015). Monopolising the centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. The International Spectator, 50(2), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2015.1015335
  • Pintilescu, C., ve Magyari, A. K. (2020). Soros conspiracy theories and the rise of populism in post-socialist Hungary and Romania. A. Astapova, O. Colăcel, C, Pintilescu, T. Scheibner (Der.), Conspiracy Theories in Eastern Europe (ss. 207-231). Routledge.
  • Rettberg, J. W. (2018). Self-representation in social media. J. Burgess, A. Marwick, T. Poell, J. W.Rettberg (Der.), SAGE handbook of social media (ss. 429-443). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Takvim. (2024). “Instagram kurallara uyana kadar kapalı kalacak! .” https://www.takvim.com.tr/guncel/2024/08/04/instagram-kurallara-uyana-kadar-kapali-kalacak-turkiyeden-net-karar-pkkya-ozgurluk-taziyeye-yasak/2 (04.10.2024).
  • T.C. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı Bakanlığı. (2024). “Türkiye’de 303 milyon aktif sosyal medya hesabı var.” https://www.uab.gov.tr/haberler/turkiye-de-303-milyon-aktif-sosyal-medya-hesabi-var (13.04.2025).
  • Tromble, R. (2018). Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter. New media & society, 20(2), 676-697. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481666915
  • Turner, V. (1979). Dramatic ritual/ritual drama: Performative and reflexive anthropology. The Kenyon Review, 1(3), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512806434-005
  • Turner, V. (1980). Social dramas and stories about them. Critical inquiry, 7(1), 141-168. https://doi.org/10.1086/448092
  • Tuğal, C. (2021). Populism studies: The case for theoretical and comparative reconstruction. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-092820-094345
  • Yesil, B. (2020). Performing nationalist populism in Turkey: an exploration of anti-Western, anti-elite and Muslim conservative undercurrents. Celebrity studies, 11(3), 336-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2020.1800669
  • Visnovitz, P., ve Jenne, E. K. (2021). Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020. Comparative European Politics, 19, 683-702. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00256-3
  • Winkler, I., ve Kristensen, M. L. (2022). Episodic organizational change and social drama–liminality and conflict in the change process. Journal of Change Management, 22(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.2013298

Siyasal antropoloji bağlamında sosyal drama: Instagram’ın kapatılması

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 50, 48 - 59, 30.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.1607688

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı sosyal medya platformlarının kapatılmasıyla popülist siyasetin toplumda nasıl bir gerilim yarattığını incelemektir. Türkiye’de Instagram'ın kısa süreliğine kapanması (2-10 Ağustos 2024), toplumsal değerlerin dönüşümünü ve toplumda meydana gelen kutuplaşmaları anlamak için örnek teşkil etmektedir. Victor Turner’ın sosyal drama modeli kullanarak tasarlanan bu çalışma, bu sosyal tarz olayların toplumda nasıl kutuplaşma halleri yaratıp bireyleri iki kutup etrafında topladığını ve popülist söylemin nasıl meşruiyet kazandığını ele almaktadır. Çalışma, Instagram’ın hem bir statü göstergesi hem de “ötekiyi” dışlama aracı olarak nasıl kullanıldığını, aynı zamanda platformun işlevselliğinin sorgulanarak toplumsal normların yeniden şekillendiğini tartışır. Bu bağlamda, popülizmin toplumsal yapıya olan etkileri sosyal drama perspektifiyle analiz edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Ahmad, I. (2019). Populism: A political anthropology approach. Public Anthropologist, 1(2), 224-245. https://doi.org/10.1163/25891715-00102006
  • Akcay, U. (2018). Neoliberal populism in Turkey and its crisis. Akcay Ü (2018) Neoliberal populism in Turkey and its crisis. IPE Working Papers, 100.
  • Ali, I. (2021). Rituals of containment: Many pandemics, body politics, and social dramas during COVID-19 in Pakistan. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 648149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.648149
  • Arat-Koç, S. (2018). Culturalizing politics, hyper-politicizing ‘culture’:‘White’vs.‘Black Turks’ and the making of authoritarian populism in Turkey. Dialectical Anthropology, 42(4), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-018-9500-2
  • Anadolu Ajansı. (2020). “Pakistan'da Kovid-19 kısıtlamalarının kalkmasıyla ölü ve vaka sayısı 8 kat arttı.” https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/pakistanda-kovid-19-kisitlamalarinin-kalkmasiyla-olu-ve-vaka-sayisi-8-kat-artti/1906844 (20.03.2025).
  • Artı Gerçek. (2024). “BTK, Instagram'a erişim engeli getirdi, kullanıcılardan tepki yağdı: 'Keyfi sansür uygulanıyor'.” https://artigercek.com/guncel/btk-instagrama-erisim-engeli-getirdi-kullanicilardan-tepki-yagdi-keyfi-sansur-313073h#google_vignette (04.10.2024).
  • Aytaç, S. E., ve Elçi, E. (2019). Populism in Turkey. Populism around the world: A comparative perspective, 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96758-5_6
  • Aytaç, S. E., ve Öniş, Z. (2014). Varieties of populism in a changing global context: The divergent paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo. Comparative Politics, 47(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041514813623137
  • Bamberg, M. (2020). Narrative analysis: An integrative approach. N. Mik-Meyer ve M. Järvinen (Der.), Qualitative analysis: Eight approaches for the social sciences, 243-264. Sage Publications.
  • Bardici, M. V. (2012). A discourse analysis of the media representation of social media for social change-The case of Egyptian revolution and political change.
  • BBC. (2024). “Türkiye’de Instagram engeli: ‘ciddi bir aşama kaydettik’.” https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/c4gvvvgdyxeo (04.10.2024).
  • Bianet. (2024). “Instagram’a erişim engeli.” https://bianet.org/haber/instagram-a-erisim-engeli-298129 (04.10.2024).
  • Bonikowski, B., ve Zhang, Y. (2023). Populism as dog-whistle politics: Anti-elite discourse and sentiments toward minority groups. Social Forces, 102(1), 180-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soac147
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.
  • Calhoun, K. (2023). Social Media. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://oxfordre.com/anthropology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.001.0001/acrefore-9780190854584-e-602&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1744036145998380&usg=AOvVaw3Ts7hFERdAWeLoISLyuONW (04.10.2024).
  • Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists?. Journal of Political ideologies, 9(3), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263500
  • De la Torre, C. (2021). What do we mean by populism? H. Tumber ve S. Waisbord (Der.), Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism (ss. 29-37). Routledge.
  • Geismar, H., ve Knox, H. (2021). Digital anthropology (2. Basım.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087885
  • Guest, G., ve McLellan, E. (2003). Distinguishing the trees from the forest: Applying cluster analysis to thematic qualitative data. Field methods, 15(2), 186-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X03015002005
  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., ve Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
  • Gunitsky, S. (2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspectives on politics, 13(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714003120
  • Gusterson, H. (2017). From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American ethnologist, 44(2), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12469
  • Hawkins, K. A. (2018). The ideational approach. K. A. Hawkins (Der.), Routledge handbook of global populism (ss. 57-72). Routledge.
  • Howarth, D. (2015). Gramsci, hegemony and post-Marxism. M. McNally (Der.), Antonio Gramsci (ss. 195-213). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Karakaya, Y. (2020). The conquest of hearts: The central role of Ottoman nostalgia within contemporary Turkish populism. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8, 125-157. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-018-0065-y
  • Laclau, E. (1996). Why do empty signifiers matter to politics. Emancipation (s), 36(46). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474470919-047
  • Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. Verso.
  • Mamonova, N. (2021). Understanding the silent majority in authoritarian populism: What can we learn from popular support for Putin in rural Russia? I. Scoones (Der.), Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World (ss. 201-225). Routledge.
  • Mazzarella, W. (2019). The anthropology of populism: Beyond the liberal settlement. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011412
  • Miller, D. (2018). Digital anthropology. F. Stein (Der.), The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Facsimile of the first edition in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. http://doi.org/10.29164/18digital
  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso Books.
  • Mouffe, C. (2014). Feminism, citizenship, and radical democratic politics. L. Nicholson and S. Seidman (Der.), Feminist Social Thought (ss. 532-544). Routledge.
  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi. org/10.1111/j
  • Mudde, C., ve Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
  • Müller, J. W. (2015). Parsing populism: Who is and who is not a populist these days?. Juncture, 22(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2050-5876.2015.00842.x
  • Oksijen. (2023). “Erdoğan: Sosyal medyanın yaygınlaşmasıyla ahlaki açıdan ciddi bir yozlaşma yaşanıyor.” https://gazeteoksijen.com/turkiye/erdogan-sosyal-medyanin-yayginlasmasiyla-ahlaki-acidan-ciddi-bir-yozlasma-yasaniyor-197355 (04.10.2024).
  • Öniş, Z. (2015). Monopolising the centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. The International Spectator, 50(2), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2015.1015335
  • Pintilescu, C., ve Magyari, A. K. (2020). Soros conspiracy theories and the rise of populism in post-socialist Hungary and Romania. A. Astapova, O. Colăcel, C, Pintilescu, T. Scheibner (Der.), Conspiracy Theories in Eastern Europe (ss. 207-231). Routledge.
  • Rettberg, J. W. (2018). Self-representation in social media. J. Burgess, A. Marwick, T. Poell, J. W.Rettberg (Der.), SAGE handbook of social media (ss. 429-443). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Takvim. (2024). “Instagram kurallara uyana kadar kapalı kalacak! .” https://www.takvim.com.tr/guncel/2024/08/04/instagram-kurallara-uyana-kadar-kapali-kalacak-turkiyeden-net-karar-pkkya-ozgurluk-taziyeye-yasak/2 (04.10.2024).
  • T.C. Ulaştırma ve Altyapı Bakanlığı. (2024). “Türkiye’de 303 milyon aktif sosyal medya hesabı var.” https://www.uab.gov.tr/haberler/turkiye-de-303-milyon-aktif-sosyal-medya-hesabi-var (13.04.2025).
  • Tromble, R. (2018). Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter. New media & society, 20(2), 676-697. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481666915
  • Turner, V. (1979). Dramatic ritual/ritual drama: Performative and reflexive anthropology. The Kenyon Review, 1(3), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512806434-005
  • Turner, V. (1980). Social dramas and stories about them. Critical inquiry, 7(1), 141-168. https://doi.org/10.1086/448092
  • Tuğal, C. (2021). Populism studies: The case for theoretical and comparative reconstruction. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-092820-094345
  • Yesil, B. (2020). Performing nationalist populism in Turkey: an exploration of anti-Western, anti-elite and Muslim conservative undercurrents. Celebrity studies, 11(3), 336-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2020.1800669
  • Visnovitz, P., ve Jenne, E. K. (2021). Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020. Comparative European Politics, 19, 683-702. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00256-3
  • Winkler, I., ve Kristensen, M. L. (2022). Episodic organizational change and social drama–liminality and conflict in the change process. Journal of Change Management, 22(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.2013298
Toplam 48 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Siyasal Antropoloji
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Cemre Aydoğan 0000-0002-9528-9892

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 23 Mayıs 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Aralık 2024
Kabul Tarihi 8 Nisan 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 50

Kaynak Göster

APA Aydoğan, C. (2025). Siyasal antropoloji bağlamında sosyal drama: Instagram’ın kapatılması. Anthropology(50), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.1607688

17919

Antropoloji’de yayımlanan makaleler ve diğer yazıların tümünün yayın hakkı Creative Commons Atıf-Gayri Ticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY-NC 4.0) altında lisanslanmıştır. Yani yayımlanan makale ve diğer muhtelif yazılar, başka yayınlarda ancak uygun referans gösterilerek, lisansa bağlantı sağlanarak, değişiklik yapıldıysa belirtilerek ve ticarî amaç gütmeyerek kullanılabilirler. Kısaca yazar(lar) veya okuyucu(lar) herhangi bir maddî çıkar gözetmeksizin, Antropoloji’deki yayınları basılı ve/veya elektronik olarak çoğaltmakta ve/veya yaymakta özgürdürler. Bu durum yine de lisans sahibi olarak Antropoloji’nin sizi ve çalışmanızı onaylayacağı anlamına gelmek zorunda değildir.
Budapeşte Açık Erişim Girişimi