An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems

Selin Sayrım; Kerem Ocak; Serap Ercan Cömert

doi:10.21541/apjess.1945333

An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems

Abstract

This study proposes an interpretable machine learning framework for predicting multiple quality outcomes in a printing production process characterized by complex and nonlinear relationships. The analysis is based on a real-world industrial dataset including key process parameters, namely Ink Weight, Top Coat Weight, Printing Speed, Varnish GC, and Temperature, along with two quality indicators: Solvent Residue and Isooctane Ratio. To capture nonlinear patterns and interaction effects, several machine learning algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), were implemented and comparatively evaluated. The proposed framework integrates data preprocessing, polynomial feature expansion, and cross-validation-based hyperparameter optimization to ensure robustness and generalization capability. The results demonstrate that nonlinear and instance-based learning approaches outperform conventional models in representing the underlying data structure. In particular, KNN achieves the highest predictive performance across both target variables, with R² values of 0.9623 for Solvent Residue and 0.9094 for Isooctane Ratio, indicating strong agreement between predicted and observed values. To enhance interpretability, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was conducted to quantify the contribution of each input variable to model predictions. The findings reveal that process-quality relationships are highly nonlinear and governed by complex interaction effects across different operating conditions. The proposed framework contributes to the literature by enabling the simultaneous prediction of multiple quality indicators, providing a robust and interpretable decision-support tool for data-driven process optimization in printing production systems.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical Statement

This study does not involve any human participants or animals.

References

H. Kim, K. H. Kim, J. Jeong, H. Jeon, and I. D. Jung, “Advancing intelligent additive manufacturing: Machine learning approaches for process optimization and quality control,” Int. J. AI Mater. Des., vol. 2, pp. 27–55, 2025, doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025130010.
M. Y. bin Masood and S. F. Zakaria, “Artificial intelligence in the printing industry: A systematic review of industrial applications, challenges and benefits,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, pp. 1713–1732, 2024, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8090141.
Y. Chen et al., “Prediction of both E-jet printing ejection cycle time and droplet diameter based on random forest regression,” Micromachines, vol. 14, p. 623, 2023, doi: 10.3390/mi14030623.
J. P. Choi et al., “Comparison and identification of optimal machine learning model for rapid process modeling of aerosol jet printing technology,” Arch. Metall. Mater., vol. 70, pp. 1085–1088, 2025, doi: 10.24425/amm.2025.154447.
A. S. Kalafatelis et al., “A stacking ensemble learning model for waste prediction in offset printing,” in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Appl., 2023, pp. 267–272.
M. Polomoshnov et al., “Image-based identification of optical quality and functional properties in inkjet-printed electronics using machine learning,” J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 36, pp. 2709–2726, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10845-024-02385-4.
A. N. Gafurov, T. H. Phung, and I. Kim, “AI-assisted reliability assessment for gravure offset printing system,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, p. 2954, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07048-z.
T. Liu, and X. Sun, “Application of artificial intelligence in 3D printing.” MATEC Web of Conferences. Vol. 413. EDP Sciences, 2025.

A. Angelopoulos et al., “Allocating orders to printing machines for defect minimization: A comparative machine learning approach.” IFIP international conference on artificial intelligence applications and innovations. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022.
N. Thielen et al., “Machine learning based quality prediction for solder paste dispensing in electronics production.” 2022 IEEE 24th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC). IEEE, 2022.
R. T. Schossler, S. Ullah, Z. Alajlan, and X. Yu, “Improving Decision-Making in 3d Concrete Printing Through Shap-Guided Machine Learning: Predictive Models and Feature Importance for Yield Stress and Viscosity.” 2023, Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4536032.
C. Jin et al., “AdaBoost ensemble learning algorithm for precision manufacturing of aerosol jet printing,” in Proc. 26th Int. Conf. Electron. Packag. Technol. (ICEPT), IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6.
P. Lall et al., “Comparison of machine learning approaches for correlating print process parameters to realized physical and electrical characteristics of printed electronics using inkjet platform,” in Proc. Int. Electron. Packag. Tech. Conf. Expo., ASME, vol. 87516, 2023, Art. no. V001T03A012.
P. Pandey et al., “Improving performance of aerosol jet printing using machine learning-driven optimization,” Appl. Res., vol. 3, p. e202300110, 2024, doi: 10.1002/appl.202300110.
N. Thielen et al., “Machine learning-based quality prediction for solder paste dispensing in electronics production,” in Proc. IEEE 24th Electron. Packag. Technol. Conf. (EPTC), 2022, pp. 858–863.
H. Borchani et al., “A survey on multi-output regression,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 5, pp. 216–233, 2015, doi: 10.1002/widm.1157.
M. L. Zhang and Z. H. Zhou, “A review on multi-label learning algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 26, pp. 1819–1837, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2013.39.
S. Ji et al., “Self-attention-augmented generative adversarial networks for data-driven modeling of nanoscale coating manufacturing,” Micromachines, vol. 13, p. 847, 2022, doi: 10.3390/mi13060847.
E. Westphal and H. Seitz, “Machine learning for the intelligent analysis of 3D printing conditions using environmental sensor data to support quality assurance,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 50, p. 102535, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102535.
J. Yuan et al., “Fusion maximal information coefficient-based quality-related kernel component analysis: Mathematical formulation and an application for nonlinear fault detection,” Axioms, vol. 14, p. 745, 2025, doi: 10.3390/axioms14100745.
A. Zheng and A. Casari, Feature Engineering for Machine Learning: Principles and Techniques for Data Scientists. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, 2018.
M. Kuhn and K. Johnson, Applied Predictive Modeling. New York: Springer, 2013.
S. M. Lundberg and S. I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 30, 2017.
C. Molnar, Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable, 2nd ed. Lulu.com, 2022.
T. M. Cover and P. E. Hart, “Nearest neighbor pattern classification,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 13, pp. 21–27, 1967, doi: 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964.
L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Mach. Learn., vol. 45, pp. 5–32, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.
J. H. Friedman, “Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine,” Ann. Stat., vol. 29, pp. 1189–1232, 2001.
T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min., 2016, pp. 785–794.
V. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.
R. Akgül and Z. Demirtaş, "The future of learning organizations: Artificial neural networks and deep learning," Trends in Business and Economics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 366–382, 2026.
I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.
N. R. Draper and H. Smith, Applied Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1998.
C. J. Willmott and K. Matsuura, “Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE),” Clim. Res., vol. 30, pp. 79–82, 2005, doi: 10.3354/cr030079.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Machine Learning (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Selin Sayrım
0009-0008-5843-0608
Türkiye

Kerem Ocak
0009-0001-4810-0145
Türkiye

Serap Ercan Cömert ^*
0000-0003-0274-0806
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 1, 2026

Submission Date

May 6, 2026

Acceptance Date

July 7, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 14 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.21541/apjess.1945333

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA45RN94RF

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Sayrım, S., Ocak, K., & Ercan Cömert, S. (2026). An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, 14(3), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjess.1945333

AMA

1.Sayrım S, Ocak K, Ercan Cömert S. An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems. APJESS. 2026;14(3):150-164. doi:10.21541/apjess.1945333

Chicago

Sayrım, Selin, Kerem Ocak, and Serap Ercan Cömert. 2026. “An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems”. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems 14 (3): 150-64. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjess.1945333.

EndNote

Sayrım S, Ocak K, Ercan Cömert S (October 1, 2026) An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems 14 3 150–164.

IEEE

[1]S. Sayrım, K. Ocak, and S. Ercan Cömert, “An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems”, APJESS, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 150–164, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.21541/apjess.1945333.

ISNAD

Sayrım, Selin - Ocak, Kerem - Ercan Cömert, Serap. “An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems”. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems 14/3 (October 1, 2026): 150-164. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjess.1945333.

JAMA

1.Sayrım S, Ocak K, Ercan Cömert S. An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems. APJESS. 2026;14:150–164.

MLA

Sayrım, Selin, et al. “An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems”. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, Oct. 2026, pp. 150-64, doi:10.21541/apjess.1945333.

Vancouver

1.Selin Sayrım, Kerem Ocak, Serap Ercan Cömert. An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Quality Outcomes in Printing Production Systems. APJESS. 2026 Oct. 1;14(3):150-64. doi:10.21541/apjess.1945333