Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Sentetik reçine emprenyeli α-selüloz dekor kâğıdı ile lamine edilmiş yonga levha yüzeylerinin nümerik olarak belirlenmesi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 60 - 68, 15.05.2025
https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1593498

Öz

Ahşap ürünlerin yüzeylerinde estetik uygulamaların yaygın kullanımı nedeniyle, ahşap malzemelerin görünümünden bahsedildiğinde genellikle kaplama sonrası yüzeyin görsel özellikleri anlaşılmaktadır. Ancak, dekor kâğıdı ile lamine edilmiş ahşap esaslı panel ürünleri, benzersiz desen ve renk gibi görsel özelliklere sahiptir ve bu özellikler kullanıcılar üzerinde psikolojik ve fizyolojik etkiler yaratabilir. Bu bağlamda, çalışmanın temel amacı, üç farklı tipte (Tip-A, -B ve -C) ve üç farklı gramajda (80 gr/cm²; 90 gr/cm²; 110 gr/cm²) beyaz dekor kâğıdı lamine edilmiş yonga levha yüzeylerini, TS EN 14323 standardına uygun olarak uygulanan beş farklı yüzey işlemi sonrası sayısal olarak değerlendirmektir. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiş ve ANOVA testi yapılmıştır. Ayrıca gruplar arasındaki farklılıkları belirlemek için Duncan testi uygulanmıştır. Seçilen beş farklı yüzey işlem ajanının yüzey optik özellikleri üzerinde, kontrol gruplarına kıyasla, belirli bir seviyede artış veya azalış yönünde etkisi olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. En yüksek kromatiklik farkları, alkol (A80IV: %17.90) ve aseton (A80V: %21.41) ile işlenmiş A tipi 80 gr/cm² örneklerde ve aseton ile işlenmiş (C90V: %-10.29) C tipi 90 gr/cm² örneklerde tespit edilmiştir. Bu farklar görsel olarak algılanabilir düzeyde olup (>10.0 puan), alkol (IV) ve aseton (V) ile işlenmiş 80 gr/cm² A tipi örnekler en yüksek ton değeri farklarını sırasıyla ΔhA80IV: 5.110 ve ΔhA80V: 5.160 olarak göstermiştir. Diğer örneklerde ise işlem koşullarına bakılmaksızın tüm dekor kâğıdı tipleri ve gramajlarında yalnızca marjinal değişiklikler (<±3.0 derece) gözlemlenmiştir. İlginç bir şekilde, tüm C tipi 110 gr/cm² (düşük parlaklık) dekor kâğıdı yüzeyleri, kontrol gruplarına kıyasla işlem sonrası daha yüksek parlaklık değerleri göstermiştir. En yüksek parlaklık değeri, su buharı ile işlenmiş örnekte 21.18 Gu olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, CIE X (kırmızı), Y (sarı) ve Z (mavi) üç uyaran değişikliklerinde belirli işlem koşullarında bazı düzeylerde farklılıklar gözlemlenmiştir. Dekor kâğıdı tipine ek olarak, gramajın da üç uyaran değişiklikleri üzerinde etkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. En yüksek uyaran değişim değeri, su ile işlenmiş A tipi örnekte XA90I: %4.51 olarak bulunurken, bunu sırasıyla su ile işlenmiş B tipi örnekte YB90I: %3.40 ve su buharı ile işlenmiş A tipi örnekte XA90I: %2.44 takip etmiştir. Diğer örneklerde ise bu değişimler yalnızca marjinal düzeyde kalmıştır (<±1.5%).

Kaynakça

  • Akbulut T, Ayrılmış N (2024) Yonga Levha Endüstrisi (Particleboard Industry). IUC Press, Istanbul.
  • Aksu S (2009) Fact of decor paper and resin type to physical mechanic and surface quality of particleboard. Graduate School of NJonsural and Applied Sciences Department of Forest Products Engineering MSc Thesis, Bartın.
  • ASTM D 523 (2018) Standard Test Method for Specular Gloss. 6.01: 32±36.
  • Beglen E (2024) Investigation of the effects of different grammages of decorative paper laminations on particle board propertes. (Turkish, Abstract in English). Graduate Education Institute, Department of Forest Products Engineering MSc Thesis, Isparta.
  • Bhatta SR, Tiippana K, Vahtikari K, Hughes M, Kyttä M (2017) Sensory and emotional perception of wooden surfaces through fingertip touch. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 367.
  • Bowyer JL (2008) The green movement and the forest products industry. Forest Products Journal, 58(7/8): 6.
  • de Morais IC, Pereira AF (2015) Perceived sensory characteristics of wood by consumers and trained evaluators. Journal of Sensory Studies, 30(6): 472-483.
  • Fengel D, Wegener G (Eds.) (2011) Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Walter de Gruyter, Berlinn. 626p.
  • Jonsson O, Lindberg S, Roos A, Hugosson M, Lindström M (2008) Consumer perceptions and preferences on solid wood, wood-based panels, and composites: a repertory grid study. Wood and Fiber Science, 663-678.
  • Miao Y, Gao X, Miao T, Xu W (2024) A Study on the visual and tactile perception of oriented strand board combined with consumer-preference analysis. Coatings, 14(8): 1000.
  • Muğla K (2010) The effect of different finishing materials on the surface properties of MDF. Bartın University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Forest Products Engineering MSc Thesis, Bartın.
  • Nemli G (2003) Sentetik Laminant Endüstrisi (Turkish Language). KTÜ Orman Fakültesi Yayınları, Ders Teksirleri Serisi No: 71, Trabzon.
  • Pizzi A, Papadopoulos AN, Policardi F (2020) Wood composites and their polymer binders. Polymers, 12(5): 1115.
  • Ross RJ (2010) Forest Products Laboratory. Wood Handbook-Wood as an engineering material, General Technical Report FPLGTR-190, Madison, WI.
  • Sahin CK, Topay M, Var AA (2020) A study on suitability of some wood species for landscape applications: surface color, hardness and roughness changes at outdoor conditions. Wood Research, 65(3): 395-404.
  • Sahin CK, Onay B (2020) Alternative wood species for playgrounds wood from fruit trees. Wood Research, 65(1): 149-160.
  • Sahin C, Onay B, Mirza E (2021) A natural sustainable material for urban design: Wood. In M. Özyavuz (Ed.), Theories, techniques, strategies for spatial planners & designers Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, pp. 221–234.
  • Sahin HT, Beglen E, Ozkan U (2024) Properties of particle boards laminated with different grammage decor papers. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 26(7): 269-277.
  • Shmulsky R, Jones PD (2019) Forest Products and Wood Science: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. NY, ISBN:9781119426431.
  • SPSS I (2013) IBM SPSS Statistic Programme. Version 22.0, Accessed: 14.10.2024.
  • TS EN 14323 (2006) Wood-based panels. Melamine faced boards for interior uses. Test methods, Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Wei M, Wang Y, Ma S, Luo MR (2017) Chromaticity and characterization of whiteness for surface colors. Optics Express, 25(23): 27981-27994.
  • Young R (2008) Historical developments in wood chemistry. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 9(1): 1-15.

Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 60 - 68, 15.05.2025
https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1593498

Öz

There have been numerous applications for aesthetic surface application to wooden products is so widespread that when we discuss the appearance of wood materials, it usually refers to the visual characteristics of the surface after it has been coated. However, decor paper laminated wood-based panel products have unique appearance characteristics, such as grain and color, which can have psychological and physiological effects on the users. In this context, the primary aim of this study to numerically evaluate three different types (Type-A, -B, and -C) at three different grammage (80 gr/cm2; 90 gr/cm2; 110 gr/cm2) of white decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces which subjected to five different surface treatments according to TS EN 14323 standard. The data obtained were evaluated statistically and ANOVA test was performed. In addition, the Duncan test was applied to determine the differences between the groups. The selected five different surface treatment agents appeared to impact on surface optical properties, some level either increase or decrease compared to counterpart controls. The highest chromacity differences were found with alcohol (A80IV: 17.90%) and acetone (A80V: 21.41%) treated A-type 80 gr/cm2 and acetone treated (C90V:-10.29%) C- type 90 gr/cm2 decor paper laminated samples that might be perceived by visually (> 10.0 point). However, alcohol (IV) and acetone (V) treated samples in 80 gr/cm2 of A-types show the highest hue value differences of Δh80IV: 5.110 and ΔhA80V: 5.160, respectively while the rest of the samples show only marginally canges, for all treatment conditions (<± 3.0 degrees), regardless of type and grammage of laminated decor papers. Interestingly, all C-type 110 gr/cm2 decor paper surfaces (low gloss decor papers) show some level higher gloss values after treatments than counterpart controls, which is the highest gloss value of 21.18 Gu was found with water vapor treated sample. It is worth noting that there are some level differences (%) of CIE X (red), and Y (yellow) and Z (blue) tristimulus changes were found with certain treatment conditions. Besides type of decor papers, the grammage appear to impact on tristimulus changes that the highest stimuli change value of XA90I: 4.51% was found with water treated A-type decor paper sample, followed by YB90I: 3.40% with water treated B-type decor paper sample, and XA90I: 2.44% with water vapor treated A-type decor paper sample, while rest of show only marginally changes (<± 1.5%), compare to other samples.

Kaynakça

  • Akbulut T, Ayrılmış N (2024) Yonga Levha Endüstrisi (Particleboard Industry). IUC Press, Istanbul.
  • Aksu S (2009) Fact of decor paper and resin type to physical mechanic and surface quality of particleboard. Graduate School of NJonsural and Applied Sciences Department of Forest Products Engineering MSc Thesis, Bartın.
  • ASTM D 523 (2018) Standard Test Method for Specular Gloss. 6.01: 32±36.
  • Beglen E (2024) Investigation of the effects of different grammages of decorative paper laminations on particle board propertes. (Turkish, Abstract in English). Graduate Education Institute, Department of Forest Products Engineering MSc Thesis, Isparta.
  • Bhatta SR, Tiippana K, Vahtikari K, Hughes M, Kyttä M (2017) Sensory and emotional perception of wooden surfaces through fingertip touch. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 367.
  • Bowyer JL (2008) The green movement and the forest products industry. Forest Products Journal, 58(7/8): 6.
  • de Morais IC, Pereira AF (2015) Perceived sensory characteristics of wood by consumers and trained evaluators. Journal of Sensory Studies, 30(6): 472-483.
  • Fengel D, Wegener G (Eds.) (2011) Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Walter de Gruyter, Berlinn. 626p.
  • Jonsson O, Lindberg S, Roos A, Hugosson M, Lindström M (2008) Consumer perceptions and preferences on solid wood, wood-based panels, and composites: a repertory grid study. Wood and Fiber Science, 663-678.
  • Miao Y, Gao X, Miao T, Xu W (2024) A Study on the visual and tactile perception of oriented strand board combined with consumer-preference analysis. Coatings, 14(8): 1000.
  • Muğla K (2010) The effect of different finishing materials on the surface properties of MDF. Bartın University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Forest Products Engineering MSc Thesis, Bartın.
  • Nemli G (2003) Sentetik Laminant Endüstrisi (Turkish Language). KTÜ Orman Fakültesi Yayınları, Ders Teksirleri Serisi No: 71, Trabzon.
  • Pizzi A, Papadopoulos AN, Policardi F (2020) Wood composites and their polymer binders. Polymers, 12(5): 1115.
  • Ross RJ (2010) Forest Products Laboratory. Wood Handbook-Wood as an engineering material, General Technical Report FPLGTR-190, Madison, WI.
  • Sahin CK, Topay M, Var AA (2020) A study on suitability of some wood species for landscape applications: surface color, hardness and roughness changes at outdoor conditions. Wood Research, 65(3): 395-404.
  • Sahin CK, Onay B (2020) Alternative wood species for playgrounds wood from fruit trees. Wood Research, 65(1): 149-160.
  • Sahin C, Onay B, Mirza E (2021) A natural sustainable material for urban design: Wood. In M. Özyavuz (Ed.), Theories, techniques, strategies for spatial planners & designers Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, pp. 221–234.
  • Sahin HT, Beglen E, Ozkan U (2024) Properties of particle boards laminated with different grammage decor papers. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 26(7): 269-277.
  • Shmulsky R, Jones PD (2019) Forest Products and Wood Science: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. NY, ISBN:9781119426431.
  • SPSS I (2013) IBM SPSS Statistic Programme. Version 22.0, Accessed: 14.10.2024.
  • TS EN 14323 (2006) Wood-based panels. Melamine faced boards for interior uses. Test methods, Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Wei M, Wang Y, Ma S, Luo MR (2017) Chromaticity and characterization of whiteness for surface colors. Optics Express, 25(23): 27981-27994.
  • Young R (2008) Historical developments in wood chemistry. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 9(1): 1-15.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ormancılık (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Halil Turgut Şahin 0000-0001-5633-6505

Uğur Özkan 0000-0003-0147-9976

Merve Cambazoğlu 0000-0001-5456-6454

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Mayıs 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Kasım 2024
Kabul Tarihi 20 Ocak 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Şahin, H. T., Özkan, U., & Cambazoğlu, M. (2025). Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1593498
AMA Şahin HT, Özkan U, Cambazoğlu M. Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces. AÇÜOFD. Mayıs 2025;26(1):60-68. doi:10.17474/artvinofd.1593498
Chicago Şahin, Halil Turgut, Uğur Özkan, ve Merve Cambazoğlu. “Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces”. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 26, sy. 1 (Mayıs 2025): 60-68. https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1593498.
EndNote Şahin HT, Özkan U, Cambazoğlu M (01 Mayıs 2025) Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 26 1 60–68.
IEEE H. T. Şahin, U. Özkan, ve M. Cambazoğlu, “Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces”, AÇÜOFD, c. 26, sy. 1, ss. 60–68, 2025, doi: 10.17474/artvinofd.1593498.
ISNAD Şahin, Halil Turgut vd. “Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces”. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 26/1 (Mayıs2025), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1593498.
JAMA Şahin HT, Özkan U, Cambazoğlu M. Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces. AÇÜOFD. 2025;26:60–68.
MLA Şahin, Halil Turgut vd. “Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces”. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 26, sy. 1, 2025, ss. 60-68, doi:10.17474/artvinofd.1593498.
Vancouver Şahin HT, Özkan U, Cambazoğlu M. Numerical determination of synthetic resin impregnated α-cellulose decor paper laminated particleboard surfaces. AÇÜOFD. 2025;26(1):60-8.
Creative Commons Lisansı
Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi Creative Commons Alıntı 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.