Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

COVID-19 PANDEMİSİ DÖNEMİNDE YAŞLILARA YÖNELİK SOKAĞA ÇIKMA KISITLAMASI: FARKLI BAKIŞ AÇILARI, FARKLI UFUKLAR

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 207 - 219, 30.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.vi.900379

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, COVID-19 salgının yayılmasını kontrol altına almak için alınan önlemlerden biri olan yaşlıların sokağa çıkma kısıtlamasına dair gençler ve yaşlılar tarafından geliştirilen farklı bakış açılarının ve farklı ufukların bir resmini sunmaktır. Pandemi, sadece bir sağlık krizine yol açmamış; tüm toplum için sosyal mesafelenme ve daha da önemlisi yaşlılar için sokağa çıkma kısıtlaması gibi sınırlamalar nedeniyle aynı zamanda sosyal bir krize de yol açmıştır. Sokağa çıkma kısıtlamasının belirli bir yaşın altındakilerin yanı sıra, belirli bir yaşın üstündekilerle sınırlanmış olması nedeniyle konu, yaşçı ve yaşçı karşıtı söylemlerin kesiştiği bir odak halini almıştır. Hans-Georg Gadamer’in “ufukların kaynaşması” kuramına dayanarak bu çalışma, yaşlıların sokağa çıkma kısıtlamasını, yaşçı ve yaşçı karşıtı olmak üzere farklı ufuklar çerçevesinden yorumlamaya yönelik bir girişimdir.

Kaynakça

  • Altın Z. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemisinde yaşlılar. Tepecik Eğit. ve Araşt. Hast. Dergisi. 30 (Ek sayı), s.49-57.
  • Andersen, J. (2020). Understanding and Interpreting Algorithms: Toward a Hermeneutics of Algorithms, Media, Culture & Society 42(7-8), s.1479–1494.
  • Ateş Ö. (2020). COVID-19 Lockdown: The Unspoken Toll on The 65+ Community in Turkey, Working With Older People, 24(4), s.303-311.
  • Ayalon, L., Chasteen A., Diehl, M., Levy, B.R., Neupert, S. D., Rothermund K., Tesch-Römer, C. & Wahl, H-W. (2021). Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity, J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 76(2), e49–e52.
  • Bilgin, N. (2008). Sosyal Psikoloji, İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • Binark, M. (2020). Eşitsizliklerin Yeniden Tezahürü: Dijital Eşitsizlikler ve Yaşlı Bireyler, Cogito, (98), s.165-174.
  • Brooke J. and Clark M. (2020). Older People’s Early Experience of Household Isolation And Social Distancing During COVID-19, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2, s.4387–4402.
  • Butler, R. (1969). Ageism: Another Form of Bigotry, The Gerontologist 9(4), s.243-246.
  • Chonody, J. M. (2016). Positive And Negative Ageism: The Role Of Benevolent And Hostile Sexism. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work, 31(2), s.207-218.
  • Daoust J. F, (2020). Elderly People and Responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries, PloS One, 15(7), s.0235590.
  • Dintrans P. V., Browne, J. and Madero-Cabib I. (2020). It Is Not Just Mortality: A Call From Chile for Comprehensive COVID-19 Policy Responses Among Older People, Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 10(10), s.1-6.
  • Dubow E.F., Huesmann L.R. & Boxer, P. (2003). Theoretical and Methodological Considerations in Cross-Generational Research on Parenting and Child Aggressive Behavior, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), s.185–192.
  • Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and Method, London: Contiuum Publishing.
  • Gendron T. L., Welleford E. A., Inker J. and White J. T. (2016). The Language of Ageism: Why We Need to Use Words Carefully, The Gerontologist, 56(6), s.997–1006.
  • Ellerich Groppe, N., Pfaller L. & Schweda M. (2021). Young for old—old for young? Ethical perspectives on intergenerational solidarity and responsibility in public discourses on COVID 19, European Journal of Ageing https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00623-9.
  • Jimenez-Sotomayor M. R., Gomez-Moreno, C. and Soto-Perez-de-Celis E. (2020). Coronavirus, Ageism and Twitter: An Evaluation of Tweets about Older Adults and COVID-19, The American Geriatrics Society, 68, s.1661-1665.
  • Jordan R. E., Adab P. and Cheng K. K. (2020). Covid-19: Risk Factors For Severe Disease And Death, British Medical Journal, 2020, 368, s.m1198.
  • Köroğlu, S.A., 2015, “Literatür Taraması Üzerine Notlar ve Bir Tarama Tekniği”, GİDB Dergi, Sayı:1, s.61-69.
  • Larsen L., Solem E. P. and Iversen T. N. (2009). A Conceptual Analysis of Ageism, Nordic Psychology, 61(3), s.4-22.
  • Leung, L. (2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism, Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3). s.997-1006,
  • Levy B. R, Chung P H., Bedford T. and Navrazhina K. (2013). Facebook as a Site for Negative Age Stereotypes, The Gerontologist, 54(2), s.172–176.
  • Meisner B. A. (2020). Are You OK, Boomer? Intensification of Ageism and Intergenerational Tensions on Social Media Amid COVID-19, Leisure Sciences, Special Issue: Leisure In The Time Of Covid-19. A Rapid Response, s.1-6.
  • Murray A. (2011) Mind the gap: technology, millennial leadership and the cross-generational workforce, The Australian Library Journal, 60(1). s.54-65.
  • Napoli, A. (2014). Social media use and generational identity: Issues and consequences on peer-to-peer and cross-generational relationships – an empirical study, Participations. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 11(2), s.182-206.
  • Palmore E. (1990). Ageism: Negative and Positive. New York: Springer Publishing.
  • Palmore, E. (2006). Ageism, (in) The Encyclopedia of Ageing, 4th Ed., Vol: I: A-K. (Ed. in Chief: R. Schulz), New York: Springer Publishing.
  • Pew Research Center (2021). Social Media Act Sheet, https://www.pewinternet.org/fact- sheet/social-media/. 2019. [accessed on March 2, 2021].
  • Previtali, F., Allen L. D. & Varlamova, M. (2020). Not Only Virus Spread: The Diffusion of Ageism during the Outbreak of COVID-19, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4-5), s.506-514.
  • Roebuck D.B., Smith D.N. & Haddaoui, T.E. (2013). Cross-Generational Perspectives on Work-Life Balance and its Impact on Women’s Opportunities for Leadership in the Workplace, Advancing Women in Leadership Vol. 33. s.52-62.
  • Quadagno, J. (1999). Aging and the Life Course, USA: McGraw-Hill College.
  • Soto-Perez-de-Celis, E. (2020). Social Media, Ageism, And Older Adults During The COVID-19 Pandemic, EClinicalMedicine, Commentary. s.29-30.
  • Tatar, B. (2018). Felsefî Hermenötük ve Yazarın Niyeti, İstanbul: Vadi Yayınları.
  • Taşdelen, B. (2020). COVID-19 salgın sürecinde yaşlılağa bakış: 280 karakter yaşlılar hakkında ne söylüyor?. Turkish Studies, 15(6), 877-891.
  • Tuna Uysal, M. ve Tan Eren G. (2020). Discrimination Against the Elderly on Social Media During the COVID-19 Epidemic: Twitter Case, Turkish Studies, 15(4), s.1147-1162.
  • Tunçer, M. (2020) Kriz Döneminde Yaşçılık: Yeni Mücadele Alanları, Cogito, (98), s.144-152.
  • Uluocak, Ş. (2018). Bilgi Sosyolojisi Açısından Gerçekliğin Sosyal İnşası ve Gadamer Hermeneutiği, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), s.135-157.
  • Varışlı, B., Gültekin, T. (2020). Yaşlı ayrımcılığının pandemi hali: COVID-19 sürecinde kuşaklararası etkileşimin dönüşümü. Turkish Studies, 15(4), s. 1227-1237.
  • Vessey D. (2009) Gadamer and the Fusion of Horizons, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 17(4), s.531-542.
  • Whitehead B. R. and Torossian E. (2021). Older Adults’ Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Stresses and Joys, The Gerontologist, 61(1), s. 36–47.
  • Xiang X, Lu X, Halavanau A, Xue J, Sun Y, Lai P. H. L. and Wu Z. (2020). Modern Senicide in the Face of a Pandemic: An Examination of Public Discourse and Sentiment About Older Adults and COVID-19 Using Machine Learning, Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 10(10), s.1–11.
  • Zervides, S. & Knowles, A. (2007). Generational Changes in Parenting Styles and the Effect of Culture, E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(1), s. 65-75.

THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 207 - 219, 30.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.vi.900379

Öz

The aim of this paper is to display different perspectives and different horizons both younger and older people have in terms of curfew for elderly. These measures have been implemented as a mechanism to control the spread of COVID-19. The pandemic caused not only a community health crisis, but also a social crisis due to the restrictions including social distancing for all people and more importantly curfew for the older people. Since the curfew is limited to people over a certain age, it became an issue of intersection of ageist and anti-ageist discourses. By drawing upon Hans-Georg Gadamer’s theory of “fusion of horizons”, this paper is an attempt to interpret older people’s curfew from two distinct horizons, those of ageist and and anti-ageist.

Kaynakça

  • Altın Z. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemisinde yaşlılar. Tepecik Eğit. ve Araşt. Hast. Dergisi. 30 (Ek sayı), s.49-57.
  • Andersen, J. (2020). Understanding and Interpreting Algorithms: Toward a Hermeneutics of Algorithms, Media, Culture & Society 42(7-8), s.1479–1494.
  • Ateş Ö. (2020). COVID-19 Lockdown: The Unspoken Toll on The 65+ Community in Turkey, Working With Older People, 24(4), s.303-311.
  • Ayalon, L., Chasteen A., Diehl, M., Levy, B.R., Neupert, S. D., Rothermund K., Tesch-Römer, C. & Wahl, H-W. (2021). Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity, J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 76(2), e49–e52.
  • Bilgin, N. (2008). Sosyal Psikoloji, İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • Binark, M. (2020). Eşitsizliklerin Yeniden Tezahürü: Dijital Eşitsizlikler ve Yaşlı Bireyler, Cogito, (98), s.165-174.
  • Brooke J. and Clark M. (2020). Older People’s Early Experience of Household Isolation And Social Distancing During COVID-19, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2, s.4387–4402.
  • Butler, R. (1969). Ageism: Another Form of Bigotry, The Gerontologist 9(4), s.243-246.
  • Chonody, J. M. (2016). Positive And Negative Ageism: The Role Of Benevolent And Hostile Sexism. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work, 31(2), s.207-218.
  • Daoust J. F, (2020). Elderly People and Responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries, PloS One, 15(7), s.0235590.
  • Dintrans P. V., Browne, J. and Madero-Cabib I. (2020). It Is Not Just Mortality: A Call From Chile for Comprehensive COVID-19 Policy Responses Among Older People, Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 10(10), s.1-6.
  • Dubow E.F., Huesmann L.R. & Boxer, P. (2003). Theoretical and Methodological Considerations in Cross-Generational Research on Parenting and Child Aggressive Behavior, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), s.185–192.
  • Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and Method, London: Contiuum Publishing.
  • Gendron T. L., Welleford E. A., Inker J. and White J. T. (2016). The Language of Ageism: Why We Need to Use Words Carefully, The Gerontologist, 56(6), s.997–1006.
  • Ellerich Groppe, N., Pfaller L. & Schweda M. (2021). Young for old—old for young? Ethical perspectives on intergenerational solidarity and responsibility in public discourses on COVID 19, European Journal of Ageing https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00623-9.
  • Jimenez-Sotomayor M. R., Gomez-Moreno, C. and Soto-Perez-de-Celis E. (2020). Coronavirus, Ageism and Twitter: An Evaluation of Tweets about Older Adults and COVID-19, The American Geriatrics Society, 68, s.1661-1665.
  • Jordan R. E., Adab P. and Cheng K. K. (2020). Covid-19: Risk Factors For Severe Disease And Death, British Medical Journal, 2020, 368, s.m1198.
  • Köroğlu, S.A., 2015, “Literatür Taraması Üzerine Notlar ve Bir Tarama Tekniği”, GİDB Dergi, Sayı:1, s.61-69.
  • Larsen L., Solem E. P. and Iversen T. N. (2009). A Conceptual Analysis of Ageism, Nordic Psychology, 61(3), s.4-22.
  • Leung, L. (2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism, Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3). s.997-1006,
  • Levy B. R, Chung P H., Bedford T. and Navrazhina K. (2013). Facebook as a Site for Negative Age Stereotypes, The Gerontologist, 54(2), s.172–176.
  • Meisner B. A. (2020). Are You OK, Boomer? Intensification of Ageism and Intergenerational Tensions on Social Media Amid COVID-19, Leisure Sciences, Special Issue: Leisure In The Time Of Covid-19. A Rapid Response, s.1-6.
  • Murray A. (2011) Mind the gap: technology, millennial leadership and the cross-generational workforce, The Australian Library Journal, 60(1). s.54-65.
  • Napoli, A. (2014). Social media use and generational identity: Issues and consequences on peer-to-peer and cross-generational relationships – an empirical study, Participations. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 11(2), s.182-206.
  • Palmore E. (1990). Ageism: Negative and Positive. New York: Springer Publishing.
  • Palmore, E. (2006). Ageism, (in) The Encyclopedia of Ageing, 4th Ed., Vol: I: A-K. (Ed. in Chief: R. Schulz), New York: Springer Publishing.
  • Pew Research Center (2021). Social Media Act Sheet, https://www.pewinternet.org/fact- sheet/social-media/. 2019. [accessed on March 2, 2021].
  • Previtali, F., Allen L. D. & Varlamova, M. (2020). Not Only Virus Spread: The Diffusion of Ageism during the Outbreak of COVID-19, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4-5), s.506-514.
  • Roebuck D.B., Smith D.N. & Haddaoui, T.E. (2013). Cross-Generational Perspectives on Work-Life Balance and its Impact on Women’s Opportunities for Leadership in the Workplace, Advancing Women in Leadership Vol. 33. s.52-62.
  • Quadagno, J. (1999). Aging and the Life Course, USA: McGraw-Hill College.
  • Soto-Perez-de-Celis, E. (2020). Social Media, Ageism, And Older Adults During The COVID-19 Pandemic, EClinicalMedicine, Commentary. s.29-30.
  • Tatar, B. (2018). Felsefî Hermenötük ve Yazarın Niyeti, İstanbul: Vadi Yayınları.
  • Taşdelen, B. (2020). COVID-19 salgın sürecinde yaşlılağa bakış: 280 karakter yaşlılar hakkında ne söylüyor?. Turkish Studies, 15(6), 877-891.
  • Tuna Uysal, M. ve Tan Eren G. (2020). Discrimination Against the Elderly on Social Media During the COVID-19 Epidemic: Twitter Case, Turkish Studies, 15(4), s.1147-1162.
  • Tunçer, M. (2020) Kriz Döneminde Yaşçılık: Yeni Mücadele Alanları, Cogito, (98), s.144-152.
  • Uluocak, Ş. (2018). Bilgi Sosyolojisi Açısından Gerçekliğin Sosyal İnşası ve Gadamer Hermeneutiği, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), s.135-157.
  • Varışlı, B., Gültekin, T. (2020). Yaşlı ayrımcılığının pandemi hali: COVID-19 sürecinde kuşaklararası etkileşimin dönüşümü. Turkish Studies, 15(4), s. 1227-1237.
  • Vessey D. (2009) Gadamer and the Fusion of Horizons, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 17(4), s.531-542.
  • Whitehead B. R. and Torossian E. (2021). Older Adults’ Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Stresses and Joys, The Gerontologist, 61(1), s. 36–47.
  • Xiang X, Lu X, Halavanau A, Xue J, Sun Y, Lai P. H. L. and Wu Z. (2020). Modern Senicide in the Face of a Pandemic: An Examination of Public Discourse and Sentiment About Older Adults and COVID-19 Using Machine Learning, Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 10(10), s.1–11.
  • Zervides, S. & Knowles, A. (2007). Generational Changes in Parenting Styles and the Effect of Culture, E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(1), s. 65-75.
Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Pelin Önder Erol Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Temmuz 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Mart 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Önder Erol, P. (2021). THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.vi.900379
AMA Önder Erol P. THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS. ASBİ. Temmuz 2021;21(2):207-219. doi:10.11616/basbed.vi.900379
Chicago Önder Erol, Pelin. “THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS”. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21, sy. 2 (Temmuz 2021): 207-19. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.vi.900379.
EndNote Önder Erol P (01 Temmuz 2021) THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21 2 207–219.
IEEE P. Önder Erol, “THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS”, ASBİ, c. 21, sy. 2, ss. 207–219, 2021, doi: 10.11616/basbed.vi.900379.
ISNAD Önder Erol, Pelin. “THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS”. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21/2 (Temmuz 2021), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.vi.900379.
JAMA Önder Erol P. THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS. ASBİ. 2021;21:207–219.
MLA Önder Erol, Pelin. “THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS”. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 21, sy. 2, 2021, ss. 207-19, doi:10.11616/basbed.vi.900379.
Vancouver Önder Erol P. THE CURFEW FOR ELDERLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES, DIFFERENT HORIZONS. ASBİ. 2021;21(2):207-19.