Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843)’NIN PULLARINDA CİNSİYET, YAŞ VE MEVSİME BAĞLI VARYASYONLARIN GEOMETRİK MORFOMETRİK YÖNTEMLERLE İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2, 96 - 104, 04.12.2016

Tarık Çiçek Alaettin Kaya Serbest Bilici

https://doi.org/10.18864/TJAS201611

Öz

Bu çalışmada Dicle Nehri’nden toplam 82 (67♀♀, 15♂♂) Capoeta umbla türüne ait balıklardan
yanal çizginin ve dorsal yüzgecin arasındaki alandan alınan ve yaş tespiti
yapılan pullardan bir tanesi Canon SX7 model binokülerde 40X büyütmede
binokülere takılı Olympus dijital kamera ile fotoğrafları çekilmiş ve tpsDig ver. 2.26 programı kullanılarak 6 landmark
alınmıştır. MorphoJ ver. 1.06d ve PAST 3.11 programları
kullanılarak ANOVA (Varyans Analizi), PCA (Temel Öğeler Analizi), CVA (Kanonik
Varyans Analizi) ve DFA (Ayrışım Fnonksiyonu ) analizleri yapılmıştır.
Analizler sonucunda boyut (CS: Centroid Size) ANOVA bakımından cinsiyet ve yaş
grupları arasında fark yeterli (p<0.05) bulunmuş ancak şekil ANOVA
bakımından gruplar arasında fark (p>0.05) bulunmamıştır. CVA ve DFA sonucu
II-IV, II-V yaş grupları ve sonbahar-kış ve sonbahar-ilkbahar grupları arasında
Mahalanobis mesafesi yeterli düzeyde (p<0.05) farklı bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cyprinidae, Capoeta umbla, Pul, Geometrik morfometri

A SURVEY ON SCALE OF Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) BY GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC METHODS DEPEND ON GENDER, AGE AND SEASON VARIATIONS

Öz

In this study, a
total of 82 (67♀♀, 15♂♂) Capoeta umbla
samples from the same location in the River of Tigris and ages of scales taken
from area between lateral line and dorsal fins of fishes were determined and
just one scale from each fish sample photographed by an Olympus digital camera
with Canon SX7 model binocular under the same conditions with 40Xmagnification
and then six landmarks were taken by using tpsDig ver. 2.26 software. Then,
ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), PCA (Principal Component Analysis), CVA
(Canonical Variance Anlysis) and DFA (Discriminant Function Analysis) analysis
were conducted by MorphoJ ver. 1.06d and PAST 3.11,. According to the results
of the analyses, there was a significant difference between gender and age
groups in terms of gender and size (CS: Centroid Size) ANOVA, however, no
difference was found in terms of the shape ANOVA of the samples. Also, there
was a significant difference between Mahalanobis distance of II-IV, II-V age
groups and Autumn-Winter, Autumn-Spring of season groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cyprinidae, Capoeta umbla, Scale, Geometric morphometri

Kaynakça

• Aydın, R., Çalta, M., & Şen, D. (2003): Age and Growth of Capoeta trutta (Pisces:Cyprinidae) from Keban Dam Lake, Turkey. Archıwum Rybactwa Polsekıego, 11(2), 237-244.
• Banarescu, P. (1991): Zoogeography of freshwaters. Distribution and Dispersal of freshwater Animals in North America and Eurasia. Aula-Verlag Wiesbaden, Vol. 2, 1091 pp.
• Bilici, S., Kaya, A., Çiçek T., & Dörtbudak M.Y. (2016) Investigation of size and shape differences depend to sex, age and season on scales of smallmouth lotak (Cyprinion kais). Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 3(1) 37-45.
• Çoban, M. Z., Gündüz, F., Türkgülü, İ., Örnekçi, N.G., Yüce, S., Demirol, F., & Alp, A. (2013): Reproductive Properties of Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) Living in Lake Hazar (Elaziğ, Turkey). International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research (IJAFR), 2(2) 38-47.
• Danabaş, D., Yildirim, N.C., Yildirim, N., Onal, A.O., Uslu, G., Unlu, E., Danabaş, S., Ergin, C., & Tayhan, N. (2015). Changes in antioxidant defense system in gills of Capoeta umbla caught from Uzuncayir Dam Lake, Turkey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 63, 72-79.
• Dörtbudak, M.Y., & Özcan, G. (2015). İkizce Çayı’ndaki (Şırnak) Siraz Balığının [Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843)] Otolit Biyometrisi-Balık Boyu Arasındaki İlişki. Yunus Araştırma Bülteni, 15(1), 67-72.
• Geldiay, R., & Balık, S. (1999). Türkiye Tatlı Su Balıkları, Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi Kitaplar Serisi No: 97. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, İzmir, 519 s.
• Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., & Ryan, P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1), 9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
• Ibanez, A.L., Cowx, I.G. & O’higgins, P. (2007): Geometric morphometric analysis of fish scales for identifying genera, species, and local populations within the Mugilidae. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 64, 1091-1100.
• Ibanez, A.L., Cowx, I.G., & O’Higgins, P. (2009). Variation in elasmoid fish scale patterns is informative with regard to taxon and swimming mode. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 155, 834-844.
• Ibanez, A.L., Cowx, I.G., & O’Higgins, P. (2009). Variation in elasmoid fish scale patterns is informative with regard to taxon and swimming mode. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 155, 834-844.
• Ibanez, A.L., Pacheco-Almanzar, E., & Cowx, I. G. (2012a). Does compensatory growth modify fish scale shape? Environmental Biology of Fishes, 94, 477-482.
• Ibanez, A.L., Espino-Barr, E., & Gallardo-Cabello, M. (2012b.). Population connectivity among geographic variants within the Lutjanidae through fish scales shape recognition. Scientia Marina, 76, 667-675.
• Klingenberg, C.P. (2011). Morpho J: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 353-357.
• Rohlf, F.J. (2016). tpsDig2 ver. 2.26. Ecology & Evololution, SUNY, Stony Brook. NY, USA.
• Staszny, Á., Ferincz, Á., Weiperth, A., Havas, E., Urbányi, B., & Paulovits, G. (2012). Scale- morphometry study to discriminate Gibel carp (Carassius gibelio) populations in the Balaton-Catchment (Hungary). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 58, 19-27.
• Turan, D., Kottelat, M., Kirankaya, S.G., & Engin, S. (2006). Capoeta ekmekciae, a new species of cyprinid fish from northeastern Anatolia (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 17(2), 147.
• Türkmen, M., Erdoğan O., Yıldırım A., & Akyurt İ. (2002): "Reproduction tactics, age and growth of Capoeta capoeta umbla Heckel,1843 from the Aşkale Region of the Karasu River, Turkey. Fisheries Research 54(3), 317-328.
• Ünlü, E. (1991). Investigation on the biological characteristics of Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) living in Tigris River. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 15, 12-38.
• Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D.L., Sheets, H.D. & Fink, W.L. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists: A primer. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 416 pp.