BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

YÖNETİŞİM VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA: OECD PANEL VERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2, 0 - , 06.04.2015

Taner Güney

Öz

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, bugünkü kaynak kullanımının gelecekteki kaynak kullanımına en az zarar verir düzeyde olmasını savunur. Yönetişim ise sürdürülebilir kalkınma için gerekli olan ortak akıl ve çok yönlü planlamayı yapabilecek güçtedir. OECD üyesi ülkelerde, yönetişimin sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerindeki etkisini analiz eden bu çalışmanın tahmin sonuçlarına göre, yönetişim sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerinde pozitif yönlü ve oldukça önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Diğer bir deyişle ülkelerin yönetişim düzeyi yükseldikçe sürdürülebilir kalkınma düzeyi yükselmektedir. Bu ülkelerde, ekonomik büyümenin ve nüfusun artması ile ticari açıklık düzeyinin yükselmesi sürdürülebilir kalkınma düzeyini yükseltirken, işsizlik oranının artışı sürdürülebilir kalkınma düzeyini düşürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Yönetişim Refah Panel Veri

Kaynakça

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. ve Robinson, J. (2001) “The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation”, American Economic Review, 91, ss.1369–1401.
  • Aidt, T., Dutta, J. ve Sena, V. (2008) “Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence” Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, ss.195-220.
  • Aidt, T. S. (2009) “Corruption, institutions, and economic development”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), ss.271–291.
  • Aidt, T. S. (2010). Corruption and sustainable development, CWPE 1061.
  • Bentzen, J. S. (2012) “How bad is corruption? Cross-country evidence of the ımpact of corruption on economic prosperity”, Review of Development Economics, 16(1), ss.167-184.
  • Carbonnier, G., Wagner, N. ve Brugger, F. (2011). Oil, gas and minerals: The impact of resource-dependence and governance on sustainable development, CCDP Working Paper, Geneva.
  • Çelik, S., Deniz, P. ve Eken, S. (2008). Eşbütünleşme Analiziyle Altı Gelişmekte Olan Ülke İçin İkiz Açıklar Hipotezi. 2. Ulusal İktisat Kongresi, 20-22 Şubat 2008, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İİBF İktisat Bölümü, İzmir.
  • Dietz, S. ve Neumayer, E. (2007) “Corruption, the resource curse and genuine saving”, Environment and Development Economics, 12, ss.33-53.
  • Ehrlich, I. ve Lui, F.T. (1999) “Bureaucratic corruption and endogenous growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 107 (6), ss.270–S293.
  • Graeff, P. ve Mehlkop, G. (2003) “The Impact of Economic Freedom on Corruption: Different Patterns for Rich and Poor Conutries”, European Journal of Political Economy, 19, ss. 605-620.
  • Gupta, S., H. R. Davoodi ve Alonso-Terme, R. (2002) “Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?”, Economics of Governance, 3(1), ss.23-45.
  • Güney, T. (2014), “Environmental Sustainability and pressure groups”, Quality & Quantity, 1-14, DOI 10.1007/s11135-014-0116-6.
  • Gyimah-Brempong, K. ve Camacho, S. M. (2006) “Corruption, Growth, and Income Distribution: Are There Regional Differences?”, Economics of Governance, 7, ss. 245-269.
  • Hsiao, C. (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, İkinci Baskı, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M.H. ve Shin, Y. (2003). “Testing For Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, ss.53-74.
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. ve Mastruzzi, M. (2010), The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues, Global Economy and Development: Brookings Institution.
  • Keefer, P. (2004). A review of the political economy of governance: From property rights to voice, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3315.
  • Kemp, R., Parto, S. ve Gibson, R. (2005). “Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice”, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, ss.12-30.
  • Kooiman, J. (1993). Societal-Political Governance: Introduction, Kooiman, J. (ed.), Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, Sage, London.
  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (1999). Corruption in empirical research- a review. 9th International Anti-Corruption Conference, , 10-15 December Durban, South Africa.
  • Lennan, A., M. ve Ngoma, W., Y. (2004) “Quality governance for sustainable development”, Progress in Development Studies, 4(4), ss.279-293.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. ve Chu, C.J. (2002). “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108, ss.1-24.
  • Mauro, P. (1995) “Corruption and growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, ss.681-712.
  • Meadowcroft, J. (2007) “Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3-4), ss.299-314.
  • Mendez, F. ve Sepulveda, F. (2006) “Corruption, growth and political regimes: cross country evidence”, European Journal of Political Economy, 22, ss.82– 98.
  • Méon, P.-G. ve Sekkat, K. (2005) “Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?” Public Choice, 122, ss.69–97.
  • Mo, P., H. (2001) “Corruption and economic growth”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 29,ss. 66-79.
  • OECD (2002a). Governance for sustainable development: Five oecd case studies, Paris: OECD.
  • OECD (2002b). Improving policy coherence and integration for sustainable development: A checklist, Paris: OECD.
  • Olson, M., Naveen, S. ve Swamy, A.,V. (2000) “Governance and growth: A simple hypothesis explainingcross-country differences in productivity growth”, Public Choice, 102, ss.341–364.
  • PECORINO, P. (1992) “Rent seeking and growth: The case of growth through human capital accumulation”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 25 (4), ss.944–956.
  • Plumptre, T. ve Graham, J. (1999) Governance and good governance: International and aboriginal perspectives. Institute On Governance. http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11075/1/ Governance%20and%20Good%20Governance.pdf?1 (Erişim: 19 January 2014).
  • Reiter, S.L. ve Steensma, K., H. (2010) “Human development and foreign direct investment in developing countries: The influence of fdi policy and corruption” World Development, 38(12), ss.1678–1691.
  • Saldanha, C. (2004) “Strategies for Good Governance in the Pacific”, Asian- Pacific Economic Literature, 18(2), ss.30-43.
  • Svensson, J. (2005) “Eight Questions about Corruption”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), ss.19-42.
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012a), Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamalı, Beta Basım Yayın, İstanbul
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012b), İleri Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamalı, Beta Basım Yayın, İstanbul
  • WCED (1987). Our Common Future. The World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Welsch, H. (2004) “Corruption, Growth, and The Environment: A Cross- Country Analysis”, Environment and Development Economics, 9, ss.663-693.

-

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2, 0 - , 06.04.2015

Taner Güney

Öz

Sustainable development advocates that the use of current resources ought to harm at least level to the use of future resources. Governance has power to make the necessary common sense and versatile planning for sustainable development. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of governance on sustainable development in OECD countries. According to the estimation results which obtained with GLS (Generalized Least Squares) method and used data covering the 1996-2012 periods, governance has a positive and significant effect on sustainable development. The higher governance level of countries has the higher sustainable development level they have. Therefore, it is important to reach sustainable development based governance level in OECD countries for the sustainability of the development

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable Development Governance Welfare Panel Data

Kaynakça

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. ve Robinson, J. (2001) “The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation”, American Economic Review, 91, ss.1369–1401.
  • Aidt, T., Dutta, J. ve Sena, V. (2008) “Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence” Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, ss.195-220.
  • Aidt, T. S. (2009) “Corruption, institutions, and economic development”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), ss.271–291.
  • Aidt, T. S. (2010). Corruption and sustainable development, CWPE 1061.
  • Bentzen, J. S. (2012) “How bad is corruption? Cross-country evidence of the ımpact of corruption on economic prosperity”, Review of Development Economics, 16(1), ss.167-184.
  • Carbonnier, G., Wagner, N. ve Brugger, F. (2011). Oil, gas and minerals: The impact of resource-dependence and governance on sustainable development, CCDP Working Paper, Geneva.
  • Çelik, S., Deniz, P. ve Eken, S. (2008). Eşbütünleşme Analiziyle Altı Gelişmekte Olan Ülke İçin İkiz Açıklar Hipotezi. 2. Ulusal İktisat Kongresi, 20-22 Şubat 2008, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İİBF İktisat Bölümü, İzmir.
  • Dietz, S. ve Neumayer, E. (2007) “Corruption, the resource curse and genuine saving”, Environment and Development Economics, 12, ss.33-53.
  • Ehrlich, I. ve Lui, F.T. (1999) “Bureaucratic corruption and endogenous growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 107 (6), ss.270–S293.
  • Graeff, P. ve Mehlkop, G. (2003) “The Impact of Economic Freedom on Corruption: Different Patterns for Rich and Poor Conutries”, European Journal of Political Economy, 19, ss. 605-620.
  • Gupta, S., H. R. Davoodi ve Alonso-Terme, R. (2002) “Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?”, Economics of Governance, 3(1), ss.23-45.
  • Güney, T. (2014), “Environmental Sustainability and pressure groups”, Quality & Quantity, 1-14, DOI 10.1007/s11135-014-0116-6.
  • Gyimah-Brempong, K. ve Camacho, S. M. (2006) “Corruption, Growth, and Income Distribution: Are There Regional Differences?”, Economics of Governance, 7, ss. 245-269.
  • Hsiao, C. (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, İkinci Baskı, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M.H. ve Shin, Y. (2003). “Testing For Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, ss.53-74.
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. ve Mastruzzi, M. (2010), The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues, Global Economy and Development: Brookings Institution.
  • Keefer, P. (2004). A review of the political economy of governance: From property rights to voice, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3315.
  • Kemp, R., Parto, S. ve Gibson, R. (2005). “Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice”, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, ss.12-30.
  • Kooiman, J. (1993). Societal-Political Governance: Introduction, Kooiman, J. (ed.), Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, Sage, London.
  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (1999). Corruption in empirical research- a review. 9th International Anti-Corruption Conference, , 10-15 December Durban, South Africa.
  • Lennan, A., M. ve Ngoma, W., Y. (2004) “Quality governance for sustainable development”, Progress in Development Studies, 4(4), ss.279-293.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. ve Chu, C.J. (2002). “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108, ss.1-24.
  • Mauro, P. (1995) “Corruption and growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, ss.681-712.
  • Meadowcroft, J. (2007) “Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3-4), ss.299-314.
  • Mendez, F. ve Sepulveda, F. (2006) “Corruption, growth and political regimes: cross country evidence”, European Journal of Political Economy, 22, ss.82– 98.
  • Méon, P.-G. ve Sekkat, K. (2005) “Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?” Public Choice, 122, ss.69–97.
  • Mo, P., H. (2001) “Corruption and economic growth”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 29,ss. 66-79.
  • OECD (2002a). Governance for sustainable development: Five oecd case studies, Paris: OECD.
  • OECD (2002b). Improving policy coherence and integration for sustainable development: A checklist, Paris: OECD.
  • Olson, M., Naveen, S. ve Swamy, A.,V. (2000) “Governance and growth: A simple hypothesis explainingcross-country differences in productivity growth”, Public Choice, 102, ss.341–364.
  • PECORINO, P. (1992) “Rent seeking and growth: The case of growth through human capital accumulation”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 25 (4), ss.944–956.
  • Plumptre, T. ve Graham, J. (1999) Governance and good governance: International and aboriginal perspectives. Institute On Governance. http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11075/1/ Governance%20and%20Good%20Governance.pdf?1 (Erişim: 19 January 2014).
  • Reiter, S.L. ve Steensma, K., H. (2010) “Human development and foreign direct investment in developing countries: The influence of fdi policy and corruption” World Development, 38(12), ss.1678–1691.
  • Saldanha, C. (2004) “Strategies for Good Governance in the Pacific”, Asian- Pacific Economic Literature, 18(2), ss.30-43.
  • Svensson, J. (2005) “Eight Questions about Corruption”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), ss.19-42.
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012a), Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamalı, Beta Basım Yayın, İstanbul
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012b), İleri Panel Veri Ekonometrisi: Stata Uygulamalı, Beta Basım Yayın, İstanbul
  • WCED (1987). Our Common Future. The World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Welsch, H. (2004) “Corruption, Growth, and The Environment: A Cross- Country Analysis”, Environment and Development Economics, 9, ss.663-693.
Toplam 39 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Taner Güney

Yayımlanma Tarihi 6 Nisan 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Güney, T. (2015). YÖNETİŞİM VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA: OECD PANEL VERİ ÖRNEĞİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.16951/iibd.18567
 Kapak Resmi İndir

4aoDA4.pngithenticate-badge-rec-positive.png800px-Open-Access-PLoS.svg.png