On the Origin of Human Souls: The Case of Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Mullah Sadra (Sadraddin Shirazi)

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 5, 3575 - 3585

Ibrahim Baghirov

https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.2024.830

Öz

Subscribing to the Platonic concept of the immaterial soul, both Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Sadraddin Shirazi (Mulla Sadra) accept the idea that human beings possess something beyond the material bodies that represent them in the physical world. However, there are significant differences between their concepts of the soul. One of these differences relates to the origination of the human soul. This paper examines these Muslim philosophers’ approaches to the issue of the soul’s origination. They both consider human souls to be originated, but they differ significantly in terms of the nature of the soul at its origination. Ibn Sina, in line with other Muslim thinkers and defenders of the Platonic soul concept, views it as an immaterial entity upon its coming into existence. However, Mulla Sadra believes that the soul is corporeal at the beginning of its earthly existence. Beyond the issue of the soul’s nature, they also hold different views on how the soul comes into being or is created. Avicenna, as an absolute dualist, believes that the soul is created externally to the body and then added to it, whereas Mulla Sadra holds that it emerges within the body through the evolutionary substantial movement of the latter. Given the variations in these philosophers’ theories on the matter, the paper concludes with the claim that, despite their agreement on the denial of the soul’s pre-existence, there are essential differences between their theories of origination. Ibn Sina appears to be a dualist, while Mulla Sadra leans toward monism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ibn Sina, Sadraddin Shirazi, soul and body, philosophical psychology, human souls

Kaynakça

• Aritoteles. (2019). Ruh Üzerine. (Çev. Ö. Aygün, Y. G. Sev). Pinhn.
• Avicenna. (1906). Compendium on the Soul. (tr. Edward Abbott van Dyck). Stamperia di Nicola Paderno.
• Avicenna. (1952). Ahval al-nafs. (Ed. Ahvani). Cairo.
• Avicenna. (1982). Kitab al-najat. (Haz. M. Fakhri). Dar Al-Afaq Al-Jadid.
• Davidson, H. A. (1992). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect: their cosmologies, theories of the active intellect, and theories of human intellect. Oxford University Press.
• Goodman, L. E. (1992). Avicenna. Routledge.
• Ḥaq, M. ’A. (1970). The Psychology of Mullā Ṣadrā. Islamic Studies, 9 (2), 173–181.
• Kaukua, J. (2015). Self-awareness in Islamic philosophy: Avicenna and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
• Lorenz, H. (2024). Ancient Theories of Soul, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/ancient-soul. Marmura, M. E. (1960). Avicenna and the Problem of the Infinite Number of Souls. Mediaeval Studies. 22 (1), 232-239.
• Mousavian, S. N. & Mostafavi, S. H. S. (2017). Avicenna on the Origination of the Human Soul. Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, 5 (1), 41-86.
• Plato. (1993). Phaedo. Cambridge University Press.
• Rahman, F. (1952). Avicenna's Psychology. Oxford University Press.
• Rahman, F. (1975). The Philosophy of Mulla Sadra (Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi). State University of New York Press.
• Salavati, A. (1389). Tahavvol-e tarikhi-ye ensan nazd Molla Sadra. Shenakht, 1 (63),121-134.
• Shirazi, S. (1382 h). al-Hikmatul-mutaaliya fil-asfaril-aqliyyatil-arbaa (Vol. 8). SIPRIn Publications.
• Shirazi, S. (2022). Arşa Ait Hikmetler (al-Hikmatul-Arshiyya). (trans. F. Yiğit). Ön söz yayincilik.
• Tahiri, I. (1393 h). Nafs ve gavaye an az didgahe Aristo Ibn Sina ve Sadruddin Shirazi. Bustane Ketab.