Shallow Shell resin versus traditional resin: A case study for Cu(II) removal

Volume: 17 Number: 3 October 3, 2016
TR EN

SHALLOW SHELL RESIN VERSUS TRADITIONAL RESIN: A CASE STUDY FOR Cu(II) REMOVAL

Abstract

References

  1. Alexandratos SD. Ion-exchange resins: a retrospective from industrial and engineering chemistry research. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2008; 48(1):388-98.
  2. Szlag DC, Wolf NJ. Recent advances in ion exchange materials and processes for pollution prevention. Clean Products Process, 1999; 1(2):117-31.
  3. Zagorodni AA. Ion exchange materials: properties and applications: 1th ed.. Elsevier, Amsterdam, London, 2007.
  4. Van Deventer J. Selected ion exchange applications in the hydrometallurgical industry. Solvent Extr. Ion Exc., 2011; 29(5-6):695-718.
  5. Sabzali J, Michaud CF A shortcut to higher regeneration efficiency with shallow shell resins. Ion Exchange at the Millennium (IEX 2000), Cambridge, UK, 269-278, 2000. http://purolite.com/Customized/CustomizedControls/PuroliteProductsManagement/Resources/rid_3 pdf [accessed 17.03.2016]
  6. Fries E. Shell-core ion exchange resin developments. Ion Exchange Conference (IEX 2012)
  7. Cambridge, UK , 2012, September.
  8. Helfferich FG. Ion exchange, 1th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1962.
  9. Aladağlı V, Temel F, Tabakcı, M. Removal of p-Nitrophenol from Aqueous Solutions Using Aminopropyl Silica Gel-Immobilized Calix [4] Arene Polymer (C [4] Aps). Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology–A Applied Sciences and Engineering, 2015; 16(2), 155-166.
  10. Alyüz B, Veli S, Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies for the Removal of Nickel and Zinc from Aqueous Solutions by Ion Exchange Resins, J. Hazard. Mater. 2009; 167(1–3): 482-488.
APA
Arar, Ö. (2016). Shallow Shell resin versus traditional resin: A case study for Cu(II) removal. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, 17(3), 530-542. https://doi.org/10.18038/btda.05967
AMA
1.Arar Ö. Shallow Shell resin versus traditional resin: A case study for Cu(II) removal. AUJST-A. 2016;17(3):530-542. doi:10.18038/btda.05967
Chicago
Arar, Özgür. 2016. “Shallow Shell Resin versus Traditional Resin: A Case Study for Cu(II) Removal”. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 17 (3): 530-42. https://doi.org/10.18038/btda.05967.
EndNote
Arar Ö (October 1, 2016) Shallow Shell resin versus traditional resin: A case study for Cu(II) removal. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 17 3 530–542.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Arar, “Shallow Shell resin versus traditional resin: A case study for Cu(II) removal”, AUJST-A, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 530–542, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.18038/btda.05967.
ISNAD
Arar, Özgür. “Shallow Shell Resin versus Traditional Resin: A Case Study for Cu(II) Removal”. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 17/3 (October 1, 2016): 530-542. https://doi.org/10.18038/btda.05967.
JAMA
1.Arar Ö. Shallow Shell resin versus traditional resin: A case study for Cu(II) removal. AUJST-A. 2016;17:530–542.
MLA
Arar, Özgür. “Shallow Shell Resin versus Traditional Resin: A Case Study for Cu(II) Removal”. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, Oct. 2016, pp. 530-42, doi:10.18038/btda.05967.
Vancouver
1.Özgür Arar. Shallow Shell resin versus traditional resin: A case study for Cu(II) removal. AUJST-A. 2016 Oct. 1;17(3):530-42. doi:10.18038/btda.05967