Research Article

Evaluating addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion processing of fiber reinforced epoxy composites in terms of flexural properties and void content

Volume: 18 Number: 2 June 30, 2017
EN

Evaluating addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion processing of fiber reinforced epoxy composites in terms of flexural properties and void content

Abstract

The effect of addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion process was investigated with emphasis being placed on the flexural properties and void content of the resulting composites. E-glass fiber and epoxy were, respectively, used as filler and matrix constituents to produce the composites. Conducting a facile TGA based methodology, fiber volume fraction, density, and void content measurements were carried out on the samples taken from different zones across the composite parts. Despite giving rise to the composite thickness, 16 % high compared to the part thickness produced by vacuum infusion without any membrane, infusion with incorporation of the membrane layer resulted in a relatively high composite fiber volume fraction with reduced void content at no expense of compaction. At the vacuum port, flexural strength and modulus values of the composites produced by membrane added vacuum infusion process (MAVIP) were found to be, respectively, 11 and 8 % higher than those of the composites produced by conventional vacuum infusion process (CVIP). On the other hand, at the inlet port, composites produced by MAVIP exhibited 12 and 9 % high flexural strength and modulus values compared to those produced by CVIP. Moreover, the load-deflection response (P/d) of the samples taken from different zones along the parts was correlated with respect to their length-to-width aspect ratio (L/b) based on the plain strain analytical approach. Once L/b aspect ratio was greater than 6.5, plain strain approach was found to converge to more definite beam modulus values, regardless of the process used.   

Keywords

: A; Composite Materials,C; Mechanical Testing

References

  1. 11. N. C. W. Judd and W. W. Wright, Voids and their effects on the mechanical properties of composites--an appraisal, SAMPE J. 14, 10, (1978).
  2. 12. S.R. Ghiorse and R.M. Jurta, Effects of low frequency vibration processing on carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos. 3, 22, (1991)
  3. 13. M. Costa, S.Almeida, M.Cerqueira. The influence of porosity on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon/epoxy and carbon/bismaleimide fabric laminates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 2101, (2001)
  4. 14. Wood JR, Bader MG. Void control for polymer matrix composite (1): theoretical and experimental methods for determining the growth and collapse of gas bubbles. Compos Manuf 5, 224, (1994)
  5. 15. E. Barbero, R. Lopez-Anido, F. Davalos. On the Mechanics of Thin-Walled Laminated” Composite Beams. Compos Part A-Appl S 27,806, (1993).
  6. 16. C. W Bert. Simplified Analysis of Static Shear Factors for Beams of Non Homogeneous Cross Section. J. Compo Mat.,.7, 1925, (1973)
  7. 17. R. Lopez-Anido, F. Davalos, E. Barbero. Experimental evaluation of stiffness of laminated composite beam elements under flexural. J. Compo Mat.,14, 49, (1995)
  8. 18. Rydarowski H., Koziol M.: Repeatability of glass fiber reinforced polymer laminate panels manufactured by hand lay-up and vacuum-assisted resin infusion, Journal of Composite Materials, 49,5, (2015)
  9. 19. Koziol M., Bator M., Rydarowski H., Hekner B.: "Comparative evaluation of GFRP laminate panels manufactured by VARI and RTM methods", Composites Theory and Practice, 15, 196, (2015)
APA
Seyhan, A. T. (2017). Evaluating addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion processing of fiber reinforced epoxy composites in terms of flexural properties and void content. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, 18(2), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.18038/aubtda.290884
AMA
1.Seyhan AT. Evaluating addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion processing of fiber reinforced epoxy composites in terms of flexural properties and void content. AUJST-A. 2017;18(2):456-467. doi:10.18038/aubtda.290884
Chicago
Seyhan, Abdullah Tuğrul. 2017. “Evaluating Addition of a Membrane Layer in Vacuum Infusion Processing of Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites in Terms of Flexural Properties and Void Content”. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 18 (2): 456-67. https://doi.org/10.18038/aubtda.290884.
EndNote
Seyhan AT (June 1, 2017) Evaluating addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion processing of fiber reinforced epoxy composites in terms of flexural properties and void content. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 18 2 456–467.
IEEE
[1]A. T. Seyhan, “Evaluating addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion processing of fiber reinforced epoxy composites in terms of flexural properties and void content”, AUJST-A, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 456–467, June 2017, doi: 10.18038/aubtda.290884.
ISNAD
Seyhan, Abdullah Tuğrul. “Evaluating Addition of a Membrane Layer in Vacuum Infusion Processing of Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites in Terms of Flexural Properties and Void Content”. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering 18/2 (June 1, 2017): 456-467. https://doi.org/10.18038/aubtda.290884.
JAMA
1.Seyhan AT. Evaluating addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion processing of fiber reinforced epoxy composites in terms of flexural properties and void content. AUJST-A. 2017;18:456–467.
MLA
Seyhan, Abdullah Tuğrul. “Evaluating Addition of a Membrane Layer in Vacuum Infusion Processing of Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites in Terms of Flexural Properties and Void Content”. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 456-67, doi:10.18038/aubtda.290884.
Vancouver
1.Abdullah Tuğrul Seyhan. Evaluating addition of a membrane layer in vacuum infusion processing of fiber reinforced epoxy composites in terms of flexural properties and void content. AUJST-A. 2017 Jun. 1;18(2):456-67. doi:10.18038/aubtda.290884