Analysis of Bragg curve parameters and lateral straggle for proton and carbon beams

Year 2021, Volume: 63 Issue: 1, 32 - 41, 30.06.2021

Fatih Ekinci , Gazi Erkan Bostancı , Özlem Dağlı , Mehmet Serdar Güzel

https://doi.org/10.33769/aupse.864475

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Heavy ions have varying effects on the target. The most important factor in comparing this effect is Linear Energy Transfer (LET). Protons and carbons are heavy ions with high LET. Since these ions lose energy through collisions as they move through the tissue, their range is not long. This loss of energy increases along the way, and the maximum energy loss is reached at the end of the range. This whole process is represented by the Bragg curve. The input dose of the Bragg curve, full width at half maximum (FWHM) value, Bragg peak amplitude and position, and Penumbra thickness are important factors in determining which particle is advantageous in tumor treatment. While heavy ions move through the tissue, small deviations occur in their direction of travel due to Coulomb collisions. These small deviations cause lateral straggle in the dose profile. Lateral straggle is important in determining the type and energy of the particle used in tumor treatments close to critical organs. In our study, when the water phantom of protons and carbon beams with different energies is taken into consideration, the input dose, FWHM value, peak amplitude and position, penumbra thickness and lateral straggle are calculated using the TRIM code and the results are compared with Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. It was found that the proton has an average of 63% more FWHM and 53% more Penumbra than the carbon ion. The carbon ion has an average of 28-45 times greater Bragg peak amplitude at the same Bragg peak location than the proton. It was observed that the proton scattered approximately 70% more in lateral straggle. The difference was found to be around 1.32 mm. In line with all these results, the most commonly used proton and carbon heavy ions in hadron therapy applications were compared.

Keywords

Carbon and proton ion radiotherapy, ion beam, Bragg curve, lateral straggle, TRIM Monte Carlo, LET

References

• PTCOG, Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group, (2020). http://ptcog.web.psi.ch. Date of Access: 15.07.2020.
• ICRU Report 49 (1993). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements: Stopping Powers and Ranges for Protons and Alpha Particles.
• Niemierko, A., Urie, M., and Goitein, M., Optimization of 3D Radiation Therapy with both Physical and Biological End Points and Constraints, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Bio. Phys., 23 (1992), 99-108.
• Dowdell, S. J., Pencil beam scanning proton therapy: the significance of secondary particles, University of Wollongong, Australia, 2011.
• Bragg, W., On the a-particles of radium and their loss of range in passing through various atoms and molecules, Philos. Mag.,10 (1905), 318-340.
• Vachani, C., Proton Therapy: The Basics, (2012). oncolink.org/treatment/article.cfm. Date of Access: 15.05.2017.
• Brown, A. and Suit, H., The centenary of the discovery of the Bragg peak, Radiother. oncol.,73 (3) (2004), 265-268.
• Ziegler, J. F., SRIM, (2018). http://www.srim.org/. Date of Access: 01.09.2020.
• Winterborn, L. N., Reports 4829 (1972)., 4832 (1972)., especially CRNL-1817 (1978). Available from the Chalk River Nuclear Laboratory, Chalk River, Ontorio, Canada, KOJ-IJO.
• Foster, D., Artur, G., Average neutronic properties of “prompt” fission products, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-9168-MS, 1982.
• Ziegler, J. F., The stopping and range of ions in matter, (1996). http.//www.srim.org/. Date of Access: 01.09.2018.
• Behrens, R., and Hupe, O., Influence of the phantom shape (slab, cylinder or alderson) on the performance of an hp(3) eye dosemeter, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, 168 (4) (2016), 441–449.
• Tang, S. B., Yin, Z. J., Huang, H., Cheng, Y., Cheng, F. H. and Mao, F. H., Geant4 used in medical physics and hadrontherapy technique, Nucl. Sci. Tech., 17 (2006), 276–279. https://doi:10.1016/S1001-8042(06)60051-1
• Jia, X., Schumann, J., Paganetti, H. and Jiang, S. B., GPU-based fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for proton therapy, Phys. Med. Biol., 57 (2012), 7783–7797. https://doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7783
• Yang, Z.-Y., Tsai, P.-E., Lee, S.-C., Liu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-C., Sato, T., et al., Inter-comparison of dose distributions calculated by FLUKA, GEANT4, MCNP, and PHITS for proton therapy, EPJ Web Conf (ICRS-13 RPSD-2016), 153 (2017), 04011. https:/doi:10.1051/epjconf/201715304011
• Jia, S. B., Hadizadeh, M. H., Mowlavi, A. A. and Loushaba, M. E., Evaluation of energy deposition and secondary particle production in proton therapy of brain using a slab head phantom, Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother.,19 (6) (2014), 376-384.
• Grimes, D. R., Warren, D. R. and Partridge, M., An approximate analytical solution of the Bethe equation for charged particles in the radiotherapeutic energy range, Sci. Rep., 7 (2017), 9781.
• Schwarz, M., Treatment planning in proton therapy, Eur. Phys. J. Plus., 126 (2011), 67.
• Almhagen, E., Development and validation of a scanned proton beam model for dose distribution verification using Monte Carlo, Thesis for Master of Science in Medical Radiation Physics, 2015.
• Kanai, T., Furusawa, Y., Fukutsu, K., Itsukaichi, H., Eguchi-Kasait, K. and Ohara, H., Irradiation of mixed beam and design of spread-out Bragg peak for heavy-ion radiotherapy, Radiat. Res., 147 (1997), 78-85.
• Lechner, A., Ivanchenko, V. N. and Knobloch, J., Validation of recent Geant4 physics models for application in carbon ion therapy, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, Vol. 268 (14) (2010), 2343-2354.
• Kraft, G., Tumortherapy with ion beams, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 454 (2000), 1-10.
• Fatih, E., Investigation of interactions of proton and carbon beams with tissue equivalent targets, Gazi University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 2019.
• Kempe, J., and Brahme, A., Energy-range relation and mean energy variation in therapeutic particle beams, Med. Phys., 35 (1) (2008), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2815935
• Steneker, M., Lomax, A., Schneider, U., Intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors, Radiother. Oncol., 80 (2006), 263–267.
• Morimoto, K., Demizu, Y., Hashimoto, N., et al., Particle radiotherapy using protons or carbon ions for unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancers with skull base invasion, Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., 44 (2014), 428–434.
• Konishi, M., Suei,Y., Fujita, M., Tanimoto, K., Radiographic changes of the mandible after proton beam radiotherapy for oral cancer: A case report, Int. J. Case Rep. Images, 8 (2017), 787–791.
• van de Water, T. A., Lomax A. J., Bijl, H. P. et al., Potential benefits of scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy versus advanced photon therapy with regard to sparing of the salivary glands in oropharyngeal cancer, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 71 (2011) 1216-1224.
• Cozzi, L., Fogliata, A., Lomax, A., Bolsi, A., A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours, Radiother. Oncol., 61 (2001) 287-297.
• Jakobi, A., Bandurska-Luque, A., Stützer, K., et al., Identification of patient benefit from proton therapy for advanced head and neck cancer patients based on individual and subgroup normal tissue complication probability analysis, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 92 (2015) 1165-1174.
• Langendijk, J. A., Lambin, P., De Ruysscher, D., et al., Selection of patients for radiotherapy with protons aiming at reduction of side effects: The model- based approach, Radiother. Oncol., 107 (2013) 267-273.
• van de Water, T., Lomax, T., Bij, H. P., et al., Comparative treatment planning study between scanned intensity modulated proton therapy and photon therapy in complex oropharyngeal carcinoma, Radiother. Oncol., 88 (2008) 77–78.
• Leeman, J. E., Romesser, P. B., Zhou, Y., McBride, S., Riaz, N., Sherman, E., Cohen, M. A., Cahlon, O. and Lee, N., Proton therapy for head and neck cancer: expanding the therapeutic window, Lancet. Oncol.18 (5) (2017), 254-265.
• Durante, M., Orecchia, R., Loeffler, J. S., Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 14 (2017) 483-495.
• Linz, U., Ion beam therapy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.