Sural Sinir İletim Çalışmalarında Yakın Sinir Yönteminin Özgüllüğü

Year 2021, Volume: 74 Issue: 2, 172 - 175, 31.08.2021

Mustafa Aykut Kural , Hatice Tankisi

https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2021.50470

https://izlik.org/JA54TW94GD

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the false positive rate of sural nerve conduction studies for healthy subjects.

Materials and Methods: We performed sural nerve conduction studies for 23 healthy subjects using both nerve-nerve technique and surface recording.

Results: We found three abnormal results in the sural nerve-nerve technique. However, all those patients had normal results in the surface recording.

Conclusion: The surface recording is recommended for suspicious cases in order to approve the abnormal results in the near-nerve technique.

Keywords

Polyneuropathy , Sural Nerve , Near-nerve Technique , Surface Electrode Recording , Nerve Conduction Study

Ethical Statement

Etik Kurul Onayı: Çalışmamızın onayı Bölgesel Etik Kurulu tarafından alınmıştır (tarih: 08/07/2015, kurul no: 1-10-72-160-15) (De Videnskabsetiske Komitéer for Region Midtjylland). Hasta Onayı: Hastalardan onay formu alınmıştır. Hakem Değerlendirmesi: Editörler kurulunun içinden ve dışından olan hakemler tarafından değerlendirilmiştir. Yazarlık Katkıları: Dizayn: M.A.K., H.T., Veri Toplama veya İşleme: M.A.K., H.T., Analiz veya Yorumlama: M.A.K., H.T., Literatür Arama: M.A.K., Yazan: M.A.K. Çıkar Çatışması: Yazarlar tarafından çıkar çatışması bildirilmemiştir. Finansal Destek: Yazarlar tarafından finansal destek almadıkları bildirilmiştir.

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

• 1. Donofrio PD, Albers JW. AAEM minimonograph #34: polyneuropathy: classification by nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Muscle Nerve. 1990;13:889-903 2. Falck B, Stålberg E, Bischoff C. Sensory nerve conduction studies with surface electrodes. Methods Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;5:1-20.
• 3. Behse F, Buchthal F. Normal sensory conduction in the nerves of the leg in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971;34:404-414.
• 4. Buchthal F, Rosenfalck A. Sensory potentials in polyneuropathy. Brain. 1971;94:241-262.
• 5. Horowitz SH, Krarup C. Conduction studies of the normal sural nerve. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:374-383.
• 6. Kural MA, Pugdahl K, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, et al. Near-Nerve Needle Technique Versus Surface Electrode Recordings in Electrodiagnosis of Diabetic Polyneuropathy. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33:346-349.
• 7. Kural MA, Karlsson P, Pugdahl K, et al. Diagnostic utility of distal nerve conduction studies and sural near-nerve needle recording in polyneuropathy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:1590-1595.
• 8. Rosenfalck P, Rosenfalck A. Electromyography-sensory and motor conduction. Findings in normal subjects. Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology. Copenhagen (1975).
• 9. Tankisi H, Pugdahl K, Otto M, et al. Misinterpretation of sural nerve conduction studies due to anatomical variation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125:2115-2121