Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine

Volume: 74 Number: 1 April 30, 2021
EN TR

The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of student feedbacks about their communication skills practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from prepared feedback forms which the students were asked to fill about their communication skills practices retrospectively. During 2010-2017 academic years, 1831 from the second-year and 1831 from the third-year students participated in the study. Year-specific feedback forms about communication skills practices were developed for each year. The form’s items were prepared as 3-point Likert scale (1: Yes/useful, 2: No/useless, 3: Not sure). Data were presented as frequency and percentage (%). Results: According to the findings, the students were satisfied with the communication skills practices in terms of content, process, educators, standardized patients, learning materials and learning environment. When the second-year students’ feedbacks were examined in general, we found that the items with the highest rate of “Yes” answers were the items of the students’ satisfaction with their educators (89.4% and 89.5%) and the items with the highest rate of “No” answers were the items of increasing the course duration (56.4% and 64.2%). When the third-year students’ feedbacks were examined, we found that the item with the highest rate of “Yes” answer was the item of the students’ satisfaction with their educators (95.9%) and the items with the highest rate of “No” answers were the items of increasing the course duration (69.5% and 68.7%) and the item of the preparation before course (50.49%). Conclusion: Positive feedbacks show that the students are generally satisfied with their communication skills practices, educators and standardized patients.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Etik Kurul Onayı: Ankara Üniversitesi Etik Kurulu’ndan gerekli etik kurul onayı alınmıştır (tarih: 13/04/2017, karar sayısı: 123). Hasta Onayı: Çalışma retrospektif veri analizi olarak düzenlendiğinden ve herhangi bir girişim içermediğinden hastalardan onam alınmadı. Hakem Değerlendirmesi: Editörler kurulunun dışından olan kişiler tarafından değerlendirilmiştir.

References

  1. 1. Gürüz D, Temel Eginli A. İletişim becerileri anlamak-anlatmak- anlaşmak. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2013.
  2. 2. Dökmen Ü. Kişilerarası iletişim çatışmaları. Sanatta ve Günlük Yaşamda İletişim Çatışmaları ve Empati. 57. Basım. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi; 2017.
  3. 3. Korkut F. İletişim becerilerini değerlendirme ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi. 1996;2:18-23.
  4. 4. Korkut F. Yetişkinlere Yönelik İletişim Becerileri Eğitimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2005;28:143-149.
  5. 5. Atici E. Hasta-Hekim ilişkisi kavramı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007;33:45-50.
  6. 6. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47:826-834.
  7. 7. Larson EB, Yao X. Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patientphysician relationship. JAMA. 2005;293:1100-1106.
  8. 8. Shapiro J. How do physicians teach empathy in the primary care setting? Acad Med. 2002;77:323-328.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Medical Education

Journal Section

Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Publication Date

April 30, 2021

Submission Date

April 29, 2019

Acceptance Date

November 19, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 74 Number: 1

APA
Gönüllü, İ., Atasay, B., Erden, S., Gökmen, D., & Çelik, G. E. (2021). The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 74(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2020.39306
AMA
1.Gönüllü İ, Atasay B, Erden S, Gökmen D, Çelik GE. The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2021;74(1):18-26. doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2020.39306
Chicago
Gönüllü, İpek, Begüm Atasay, Sengul Erden, Derya Gökmen, and Gülfem Elif Çelik. 2021. “The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 74 (1): 18-26. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2020.39306.
EndNote
Gönüllü İ, Atasay B, Erden S, Gökmen D, Çelik GE (April 1, 2021) The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 74 1 18–26.
IEEE
[1]İ. Gönüllü, B. Atasay, S. Erden, D. Gökmen, and G. E. Çelik, “The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 18–26, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.4274/atfm.galenos.2020.39306.
ISNAD
Gönüllü, İpek - Atasay, Begüm - Erden, Sengul - Gökmen, Derya - Çelik, Gülfem Elif. “The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 74/1 (April 1, 2021): 18-26. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2020.39306.
JAMA
1.Gönüllü İ, Atasay B, Erden S, Gökmen D, Çelik GE. The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2021;74:18–26.
MLA
Gönüllü, İpek, et al. “The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 74, no. 1, Apr. 2021, pp. 18-26, doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2020.39306.
Vancouver
1.İpek Gönüllü, Begüm Atasay, Sengul Erden, Derya Gökmen, Gülfem Elif Çelik. The Students’ Feedbacks on Comunication Skills Practices in Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2021 Apr. 1;74(1):18-26. doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2020.39306

Cited By