Review

Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu

Volume: 66 Number: 3 November 13, 2014
Savaș Serel , Servet Elçin Alpat *, Cem Çerkezoğlu , Zeki Can , Serdar Gültan
PDF Download
Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası Cover Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası
EN TR

Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu

Abstract

It has become evident that breast cancer; the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women; can be prevented in some cases due to the increasing social awareness, BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation analysis and developing risk reduction strategies. Prophylactic mastectomy, which happens to be one of those strategies, is found to reduce the risk of cancer development by 85-90 % in high-risk patients. Analysis of the genes leaves the surgeons with a population at an early age that gives importance to the integrity of the body image and demands breast reconstruction as soon as possible. However; breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy bears some distinct features. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach should be followed and the timing of surgical procedure, type of mastectomy to be applied, reconstruction options for each patient, possible complications should be discussed in details before the surgery. This study defines the differences and the importance of reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy

Keywords

Breast cancer, BRCA 1-2, Prophylactic, Mastectomy, Breast reconstruction, Implant, Autologous.

References

  1. 1. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2001; 51: 15–36.
  2. 2. Van Sprundel TC, Schmidt MK, Rookus MA, et al. Risk reduction of contralateral breast cancer and survival after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA 2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2005; 93: 287-292.
  3. 3. McDonnell SK, Schaid DJ, Myers JL, et al. Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 3938-3943.
  4. 4. Penisi, V.R., Capozzi, A. Subcutaneous mastectomy data: Final statistical analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 1989; 13: 15
  5. 5.American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2009-2010. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc.
  6. 6. McPherson, K., Steel, G.M., Dixon, J.M. ABC of breast diseases: Breast cancer- Epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. B.M.J. 2000; 321: 624.
  7. 7. Armstrong, K., Eisen, A., Weber, B. Assessing the risk of breast cancer. N Engl.J.Med 2000; 342: 564.
  8. 8. Carlson GW. Skin sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. Am Surg 1996; 62: 151-155.
  9. 9. Shrotria S. The peri-areolar incision— gateway to the breast Eur J Surg Oncol 2001; 27: 601–603.
  10. 10. Singletary SE, Robb GL. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 95-97.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Facial Plastic Surgery

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Savaș Serel This is me
0000-0002-8401-3153
Türkiye

Servet Elçin Alpat * This is me
0000-0002-3563-3639
Türkiye

Cem Çerkezoğlu
0000-0002-8944-7989
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Serdar Gültan This is me
0000-0003-3158-2894
Türkiye

Publication Date

November 13, 2014

Submission Date

March 15, 2012

Acceptance Date

February 13, 2014

Published in Issue

Year 2013 Volume: 66 Number: 3

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA84LB94LG

Cite

RIS / Bibtex
APA
Serel, S., Alpat, S. E., Çerkezoğlu, C., Can, Z., & Gültan, S. (2014). Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 66(3), 119-123. https://izlik.org/JA84LB94LG
AMA
1.Serel S, Alpat SE, Çerkezoğlu C, Can Z, Gültan S. Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2014;66(3):119-123. https://izlik.org/JA84LB94LG
Chicago
Serel, Savaș, Servet Elçin Alpat, Cem Çerkezoğlu, Zeki Can, and Serdar Gültan. 2014. “Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 66 (3): 119-23. https://izlik.org/JA84LB94LG.
EndNote
Serel S, Alpat SE, Çerkezoğlu C, Can Z, Gültan S (November 1, 2014) Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 66 3 119–123.
IEEE
[1]S. Serel, S. E. Alpat, C. Çerkezoğlu, Z. Can, and S. Gültan, “Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 119–123, Nov. 2014, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA84LB94LG
ISNAD
Serel, Savaș - Alpat, Servet Elçin - Çerkezoğlu, Cem - Can, Zeki - Gültan, Serdar. “Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 66/3 (November 1, 2014): 119-123. https://izlik.org/JA84LB94LG.
JAMA
1.Serel S, Alpat SE, Çerkezoğlu C, Can Z, Gültan S. Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2014;66:119–123.
MLA
Serel, Savaș, et al. “Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 66, no. 3, Nov. 2014, pp. 119-23, https://izlik.org/JA84LB94LG.
Vancouver
1.Savaș Serel, Servet Elçin Alpat, Cem Çerkezoğlu, Zeki Can, Serdar Gültan. Profilaktik Mastektomide Meme Rekonstrüksiyonu. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası [Internet]. 2014 Nov. 1;66(3):119-23. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA84LB94LG