Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler

Volume: 72 Number: 2 October 2, 2019
EN TR

Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler

Abstract

Objectives: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a minimally invasive procedure with well-known efficacy and safety that is frequently used in patients who cannot be fed orally. In the literature, studies investigating long-term follow-up results in patients undergoing PEG are limited. In this study, we aimed to determine the long-term follow-up results and the factors affecting mortality in patients undergoing PEG. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and three patients who underwent PEG placement between January 2013 and June 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients, postoperative follow-up times, complications, PEG indications, laboratory parameters during the procedure were recorded from the patient files. During the follow-up period, the mortality and time of the patients were determined via the death notification system. Results: A total of 203 patients (101 male, 102 female) were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 77 years (18-96). The most frequent PEG placement indication was stroke with a frequency of 34%, followed by dementia (28.6%), malignancy (10.8%) and other (15.8%) reasons. The median follow-up period was 33.6 months (30.5-36.7) and the median survival was 22 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.8-30.5]. Mortality rates were 1.5% in the first month, 3% in 3 months, 12.3% in 1 year, 26.6 years in 2 years, 34.5% in 3 years and 44.3% in 5 years. There was no correlation between PEG indications and mortality, but there was a statistically significant correlation between hyponatremia and mortality (Odds ratio: 1.07, p=0.027, %95 CI). Conclusion: There was no statistically significant relationship between PEG placement indications and mortality, but there was a statistically significant correlation between hyponatremia and mortality.

Keywords

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, Mortality, Follow-up Results

References

  1. 1. Gauderer WL, Ponsky JL, İzant RJ. Gastrostomy without laparatomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatry Surg. 1980;15:872-875.
  2. 2. Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW, Stellato TA. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Review of 150 cases. Arch Surg. 1983;118:913-914.
  3. 3. Lucendo AJ, Friginal-Ruiz AB. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: An update on its indications, management, complications, and care. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2014;106:529-539.
  4. 4. Hucl T, Spicak J. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30:769-781.
  5. 5. Friginal-Ruiz AB, Lucendo AJ. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: A Practical Overview on Its Indications, Placement Conditions, Management, and Nursing Care. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015;38:354-366
  6. 6. Nair S, Hertan H, Pitchumoni CS. Hypoalbuminemia is a poor predictor of survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in elderly patients with dementia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:133-136.
  7. 7. Mitchell SL, Tetroe JM. Survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:735-739.
  8. 8. Finocchiaro C, Galletti R, Rovera G, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a long-term follow-up. Nutrition. 1997;13:520-523.
  9. 9. Amann W, Mischinger HJ, Berger A, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). 8 years of clinical experience in 232 patients. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:741-744.
  10. 10. McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. BMJ. 1994;308:945-948.
APA
Kahramanoğlu Aksoy, E. (2019). Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 72(2), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2019.36854
AMA
1.Kahramanoğlu Aksoy E. Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2019;72(2):179-183. doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2019.36854
Chicago
Kahramanoğlu Aksoy, Evrim. 2019. “Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları Ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 72 (2): 179-83. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2019.36854.
EndNote
Kahramanoğlu Aksoy E (October 1, 2019) Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 72 2 179–183.
IEEE
[1]E. Kahramanoğlu Aksoy, “Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 179–183, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.4274/atfm.galenos.2019.36854.
ISNAD
Kahramanoğlu Aksoy, Evrim. “Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları Ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 72/2 (October 1, 2019): 179-183. https://doi.org/10.4274/atfm.galenos.2019.36854.
JAMA
1.Kahramanoğlu Aksoy E. Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2019;72:179–183.
MLA
Kahramanoğlu Aksoy, Evrim. “Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları Ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 72, no. 2, Oct. 2019, pp. 179-83, doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2019.36854.
Vancouver
1.Evrim Kahramanoğlu Aksoy. Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Takılan Hastaların Uzun Dönem Takip Sonuçları ve Sağkalımı Etkileyen Faktörler. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2019 Oct. 1;72(2):179-83. doi:10.4274/atfm.galenos.2019.36854