<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>baebd</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">1308-8971</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.51460/baebd.1706226</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Other Fields of Education (Other)</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Alan Eğitimleri (Diğer)</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <trans-title-group xml:lang="tr">
                                    <trans-title>Tablodan Grafiğe: Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Çözünürlük Grafikleri Çizmedeki Zorluklarını Keşfetmek</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <article-title>From Table to Graph: Exploring Gifted Students’ Difficulties in Drawing Solubility Graphs</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-6267</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Coştu</surname>
                                    <given-names>Fatma</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>YILDIZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                                                <issue>Advanced Online Publication</issue>
                                                
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20250526">
                        <day>05</day>
                        <month>26</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20260207">
                        <day>02</day>
                        <month>07</month>
                        <year>2026</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2010, Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2010</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="tr">
                            <p>Bu çalışmanın amacı, özel yetenekli öğrencilerin, bilimsel düşünme ve veri yorumlamanın merkezinde yer alan bir beceri olan çözünürlük kavramıyla ilgili grafikler oluştururken karşılaştıkları belirli zorlukları belirlemektir. Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin grafik çizme süreçlerinin derinlemesine incelenmesine olanak tanıyan nitel bir vaka çalışması tasarımı kullanılmıştır. 64 özel yetenekli ortaokul öğrencisine, beş kimyasal bileşiğin çeşitli sıcaklıklarda sudaki çözünürlüğünü gösteren tablolaştırılmış veriler sunulmuş ve ilgili çözünürlük-sıcaklık grafiklerini çizmeleri istenmiştir. Öğrencilerin grafikleri, grafik oluşturmanın temel bileşenlerini ele alan dokuz niteliksel kriterden oluşan Temiz ve Tan (2009) grafik çizim değerlendirme ölçeği kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz, öğrencilerin grafik performanslarının kalıplarını, tekrarlanan hatalarını ve niteliksel özelliklerini belirlemeye odaklanmıştır. Bulgular, birçok özel yetenekli öğrencinin, özellikle eksenlerin ölçeklendirilmesi ve etiketlenmesi, veri noktalarının doğru bir şekilde yerleştirilmesi ve uygun şekilde bağlanması gibi grafik oluşturmanın temel bileşenleriyle mücadele ettiğini ortaya koymuştur. Öğrencilerin sadece küçük bir yüzdesi tüm kriterleri tam olarak karşılamıştır, bu da grafik oluşturma zorluklarının özel yetenekli öğrenciler arasında bile devam ettiğini göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar, özel yetenekliler eğitiminde genellikle göz ardı edilen grafik becerilerinin açıkça öğretilmesinin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bu çalışma, özel yetenekli öğrencilerin grafiksel temsil becerileri, özellikle bilimsel verileri grafikler aracılığıyla görsel olarak temsil etme ve düzenleme becerileri üzerine yapılan sınırlı sayıda araştırmaya katkıda bulunmakta ve bilimsel süreç yeterliliklerini geliştirmek için hedefe yönelik öğretim müdahaleleri tasarlamak için önemli farkındalıklar sağlamaktadır.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>This study aims to identify the specific difficulties gifted students encounter when constructing graphs related to the concept of solubility—a skill central to scientific thinking and data interpretation. A qualitative case study design, allowing for an in-depth examination of gifted students’ graph-drawing processes, was utilized. A total of 64 gifted middle school students were presented with tabulated data showing the solubility of five chemical compounds in water at various temperatures and were asked to draw corresponding solubility–temperature graphs. Students’ graphs were analyzed using the Temiz and Tan (2009) graph-drawing rubric, which consists of nine qualitative criteria addressing key components of graph construction. The analysis focused on identifying patterns, recurring errors, and qualitative characteristics of students’ graphing performances. The findings revealed that many gifted students struggled with key components of graph construction, particularly scaling and labeling the axes, accurately placing data points, and connecting them appropriately. Only a small percentage of students fully met all criteria, indicating that graphing difficulties persist even among high-ability learners. These results underscore the importance of explicitly teaching graphing skills, which are often overlooked in gifted education. The study contributes to the limited body of research on gifted students’ graphical representational skills, specifically their ability to visually represent and organize scientific data through graphs, and provides insights for designing targeted instructional interventions to enhance their scientific process competencies.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Gifted students</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Solubility</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Graph drawing</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Scientific process skills</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Data interpretation</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="tr">
                                                    <kwd>Özel yetenekli öğrenciler</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Çözünürlük</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Grafik çizimi</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Bilimsel süreç becerileri</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Veri yorumlama</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ayas, A., Çepni, S., Johnson, D. and Turgut, M., F. (1997). Kimya öğretimi, Bilkent, Ankara: YÖK/Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Yayınları.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bayazıt, İ. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının grafikler konusundaki bilgi düzeyleri. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(4), 1325 -1346.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student ınterpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750-762.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Beler, Ş. (2009). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerin fotosentez konusu ile ilgili grafikleri okumada ve yorumlamada karşılaştıkları güçlüklerin belirlenmesi. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bengtsson, L. A. and Ottosson, T. (2006). What lies behind graphicacy? Relating students’ results on a test of graphically represented quantitative information to formal academic achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20087</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bilal A-S. and Salihah, A. (2024). A systematic literature review of knowledge graph construction and application in education. Heliyon, 10(3), e25383.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Biswal, S. and Behera, B. (2023). Enhancing science process skills through inquiry-based learning: A comprehensive literature review and analysis. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(8), 1583-1589. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23817121415</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bowen, G.M. and Roth, M.W. (2005). Data and graph ınterpretation practices among preservice science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1063-1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20086</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bragdon, D., Pandiscio, E. and Speer, N. (2019). University students&#039; graph interpretation and comprehension abilities. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(4), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1480862</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bulut, A. S. K. (2021). The effect of the integration of science and mathematics on critical thinking and scientific process skills of the gifted students: The effect of the integration of science and mathematics. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(1), 290-312.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Coştu, B. (2007). Comparison of students’ performance on algorithmic, conceptual and graphical chemistry gas problems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9069-z</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Coştu, F. (2023). Gifted students’ performance on algorithmic, conceptual and graphical questions. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4), 600-614. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.00</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Coştu, F. (2025) Prospective science teachers are good at which of three types of tests: algorithmic, conceptual and graphical comparison. Research in Science and Technological Education, 43(1), 107–124.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2235293</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Das, R. and Soylu, M. (2023). A key review on graph data science: The power of graphs in scientific studies. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 240, 104896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104896</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dori, Y.J. and Sason, I. (2008). Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: the value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 219-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20197</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dunham, P. H. and Osborne, A. (1991). Learning how to see: Students’ graphing difficulties. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(4), 35-49.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Erbilgin, E., Hudal, K. M. and Fernandez, L. M. (2006). Scaling and representing exponential relationships. Dimensions in Mathematics, 26(2), 55-62.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ercan, O., Coştu, F. and Coştu, B. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının grafik çiziminde karşılaştıkları güçlüklerin belirlenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(6), 1929-1938. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2227</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Forster, P. A. (2004). Graphing in physics: Processes and sources of error in tertiary entrance examinations in Western Australia. Research in Science Education, 34(3), 239-265. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044597.10584.1a</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gizaw, G. and Sota, S. (2023). Improving science process skills of students: A review of literature. Science Education International, 34(3), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i3.5  
 
Gök, T. (2023). Comparison of university students&#039; graphic interpretation skills. Journal of Science Learning, 6(3), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i3.55419</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gültekin, C. (2009). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin çözeltiler ve özellikleri konusu ile ilgili grafik çizme okuma ve yorumlama becerilerinin incelenmesi. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gültekin, C. (2014). Ortaöğretim öğrencileri ile üniversite öğrencilerinin hal değişimi, çözeltiler ve çözünürlük konuları ile ilgili grafik çizme okuma ve yorumlama becerilerinin karşılaştırılması. [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., Planinic, M. and Andrasevic, A. (2016). Student reasoning about graphs in different contexts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12, 10106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010106</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Karslı, F. (2011). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel süreç becerilerini geliştirmesinde ve kavramsal değişim sağlamasında zenginleştirilmiş laboratuar rehber materyallerinin etkisi. [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kurnaz, M. A. (2013). An analysis of Turkish high school students&#039; performance on conceptual, algorithmic and graphical physics problems. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 3(7), 698-714. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/analysis-turkish-high-school-students-performance/docview/1417593053/se-2</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kwon, O. N. (2002). The effect of calculator‐based ranger activities on students&#039; graphing ability. School Science and Mathematics, 102(2), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17895.x</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O. and Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060001001 
 
MoNE (2007). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi 4 ve 5. sınıflar öğretim programı. Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MoNE (2013). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar öğretim programı. Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MoNE (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar). Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MoNE (2020). TIMSS 2019 Türkiye Raporu, MEB Yayını. https://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_12/10175514_TIMSS_2019_Turkiye_On_Raporu_.pdf</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MoNE (2023). PISA 2022 Türkiye Raporu. [PISA 2022 Türkiye Report] Retrieved from: https://pisa.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2023_12/05125555_pisa2022_rapor_051223 .pdf</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MoNE (2024). TIMSS 2023 Türkiye Raporu, MEB Yayını. https://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2024_12/04111224_timss_2023_rapor_0412.pdf</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L. and Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Paper presented at the TIMSS and PIRLS International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">OECD (2023). PISA 2022 Results. Retrieved: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/OECD_2022_PISA_Results_Comparing%20countries%E2 %80%99%20and%20economies%E2%80%99%20performance%20in%20mathematic s.pdf</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Okur, M. and Güngör Seyhan, H. (2025). Mobile Technology-Enhanced 5E Learning Model in Physics Labs: An Analysis of Graph Drawing and Interpretation Skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-26.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özgür, S. D. and Yilmaz, A. (2017). The effect of inquiry-based learning on gifted and talented students&#039; understanding of acids-bases concepts and motivation. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 994-1008.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Parks, S. (2021). Teaching analytical and critical thinking skills in gifted education. In Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 307-344). Routledge.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Parmar, R. S. and Signer, B. R. (2005). Sources of error in constructing and ınterpreting graphs a study of fourth-and fifth-grade students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380030601</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Planinic, M., Milin-Sipus, Z., Katic, H., Susac, A. and Ivanjek, L. (2012). Comparison of student understanding of line graph slope in physics and mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9344-1 
 
Potgieter, M., Harding, A. and Engelbrecht, J. (2008). Transfer of algebraic and graphical thinking between mathematics and chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20208</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Şahin, S., Gençtürk, E. and Budanur, T. (2007). Coğrafya öğretiminde uygun grafik seçimi ve kullanımının öğrenme üzerinde etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 293-302.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Şen, A. Z. and Nakipoğlu, C. (2012). Ortaöğretim kimya ders kitaplarının bilimsel süreç becerileri açısından incelenmesi. Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 47-65.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sezek, F. and Doymuş, K. (2022). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının grafik türü tercihi, okuma ve çizim becerileri. Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 8(58), 760-766. https://doi.org/10.29228/smryj.62014</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref43">
                        <label>43</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sezek, F. (2024). Sınıf öğretmen adaylarının grafik okuryazarlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 8(63), 1651-1660. https://doi.org/10.29228/smryj.64390  
 
Shah, P. and Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction. Educational Psychology Review 14, 47–69 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref44">
                        <label>44</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Stanley, M. (2023). Qualitative descriptive: A very good place to start. In Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and occupational therapy (pp. 52-67). Routledge.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref45">
                        <label>45</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Stanley, T. (2021). Project-based learning for gifted students: A step-by-step guide to PBL and inquiry in the classroom. Routledge.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref46">
                        <label>46</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Stephens, A. L. (2024). From graphs as task to graphs as tool. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(5), 1206-1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21930</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref47">
                        <label>47</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tairab, H. H. and Khalaf Al-Naqbi, A.K. (2004). How do secondary school science students interpret and construct scientific graphs? Journal of Biological Education, 38(3), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655920</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref48">
                        <label>48</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tan, M. and Temiz, B. K. (2003). Fen öğretiminde bilimsel süreç becerilerinin yeri ve önemi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(13), 89-101.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref49">
                        <label>49</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Taşar, M. F., Kandil İngeç, Ş. and Ünlü Güneş, P. (2002, Eylül). Grafik çizme ve anlama becerisinin saptanması. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, ODTÜ, Ankara.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref50">
                        <label>50</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Temiz, B. K. and Tan, M. (2009). Grafik çizme becerilerinin kontrol listesi ile ölçülmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 71-83</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref51">
                        <label>51</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tomková, V. and Páleniková, K. (2024). Level of graphic skills of elementary school students. TEM Journal, 13(2), 1548-1558. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM132-68</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref52">
                        <label>52</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tuncer Koçal, G. D. and Ormancı, Ü. (2024). 7. Sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilimleri dersinde grafik eğitimine ilişkin görüşleri. Fen Matematik Girişimcilik ve Teknoloji Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(2), 149-158.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref53">
                        <label>53</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Uyanık, F. (2007). Ortaöğretim 10. sınıf öğrencilerinin grafik anlama ve yorumlama ile kinematik başarıları arasındaki ilişki. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref54">
                        <label>54</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yayla, G. and Özsevgeç, T. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin grafik becerilerinin incelenmesi: çizgi grafikleri oluşturma ve yorumlama. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(3), 1381-1400.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref55">
                        <label>55</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yeltekin Atar, B. Ş. and Aykutlu, I. (2023). High school students’ user skills concerning force and motion graphs. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(1), 211-242. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1205369</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
