Analyzing the Fluid Flow of Transit-Time Ultrasonic Flowmeter with Image Processing Technique and Developing a Quality Metric Depending on Pipe Profile

Öz

The ultrasonic transit-time method measures the velocity and quantity of fluids in circular type pipes by using the difference of transit time between the ultrasonic pulses propagating with and against the flow direction. This method gives the average velocity of the fluid along a particular acoustic path. At least two ultrasonic transducers are used for an acoustic path. The multipath ultrasonic flowmeters have more acoustic paths. In this paper, the acoustic path between two transducers is described as pixels for the turbulent flow and formed a flow map for ideal flow conditions such as no elbow or bend depending on pipe profile. Using the obtained pixel values, the average fluid velocity is calculated between two transducers. Finally, a quality metric that calculates the ideal average fluid velocity ratio between the acoustic paths for the turbulent flow is developed. Thus, researchers can evaluate their designs with this quality metric.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fluid Flow
• Image Processing
• Quality Index
• Ultrasonic Flowmeter

Kaynakça

1. [1] Y. Inoue, H. Kikura, H. Murakawa, M. Aritomi, M. Mori, “A study of ultrasonic propagation for ultrasonic flow rate measurement.”, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol.19. 3-4, 2008, pp. 223-232.
2. [2] Y. Yu, G. Zong, “Design and simulation of an ultrasonic flow meter for thin pipe”, In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, August 2011, pp. 1115-1119.
3. [3] L. Mingwei, L. Guosheng, H. Yanguo, “Research on improving the accuracy of the ultrasonic flow-meter with time difference method”, In 2010 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering, June 2010, pp. 1704-1707.
4. [4] L. Svilainis, P. Kabisius, A. Aleksandrovas, A. Chaziachmetovas, “Excitation signal's influence on ultrasonic transit time flow meter's performance”, In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 42. 1, 2012, pp. 012047.
5. [5] S. V. Kulkarni, M. M. Sonkhaskar, S. D. Pardeshi, “Test bench development for acquisition module FPGA of Ultrasonic flow meter”, In 2015 International Conference on Pervasive Computing (ICPC), January 2015, pp. 1-6.
6. [6] Y. Wang, “New-type ultrasonic flow meter design based on FPGA high-speed data sampling”, In 2009 9th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, August 2009, pp. 1-509-512.
7. [7] Y. Bo, C. Li, “Electronic circuit design for reciprocal operation of transit-time ultrasonic flow meters.”, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol.32, 2013, pp.5-13.
8. [8] J. Berrebi, P. E. Martinsson, M. Willatzen, J. Delsing, “Ultrasonic flow metering errors due to pulsating flow.”, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 15.3, 2004, pp. 179-185.

9. [9] Z. Chen, Z. Li, “Robust precise time difference estimation based on digital zero-crossing detection algorithm.”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 65.8, 2016, pp.1739-1748.
10. [10] A. Hamouda, O. Manck, M. Hafiane, N. E. Bouguechal, “An enhanced technique for ultrasonic flow metering featuring very low jitter and offset.”, Sensors, vol. 16.7, 2016, pp.1008.
11. [11] I. Gryshanova, I. Korobko, P. Pogrebniy, “Increasing of accuracy of multipath ultrasonic flow meters by intelligent correction.”, Measurement Automation Monitoring, vol. 62,2016, pp.411-416.
12. [12] K. Zanker, “Diagnostic ability of the daniel four-path ultrasonic flow meter.”, In Southeast Asia Flow Measurement Workshop, March 2003.
13. [13] T. Tresch, P. Gruber, T. Staubli, “Comparison of integration methods for multipath acoustic discharge measurements.”, In proc. IGHEM, July 2006, pp. 1-16.
14. [14] T. Tresch, B. Lüscher, T. Staubli, P. Gruber, “Presentation of optimized integration methods and weighting corrections for the acoustic discharge measurement.”, In International conference on hydraulic efficiency measurements, September 2008.
15. [15] A. Voser, “Analyse und Fehleroptimierung der mehrpfadigen akustischen Durchflussmessung in Wasserkraftanlagen”, Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich, 1999.
16. [16] L. Qin, L. Hu, K. Mao, W. Chen, X. Fu, “Flowrate Determination for Arbitrary Multipath Arrangement Based on Generalized Inverse of Matrix.”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol.17.12, 2017, pp. 3625-3634.
17. [17] X. Tang, X. Xie, H. Zhang, H. Zhou, “Data integration for multi-path ultrasonic flowmeter based on Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm.”, IET Science, Measurement & Technology, vol.9.8, 2015, pp. 909-920.
18. [18] L. Peng, B. Zhang, H. Zhao, S. A. Stephane, H. Ishikawa, K. Shimizu, “Data integration method for multipath ultrasonic flowmeter.”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol.12.9, 2012, pp. 2866-2874.
19. [19] L. C. Lynnworth, Ultrasonic Measurements for Process Control, Academic Press, Inc., 1989.
20. [20] J. T. Davies, Turbulence Phenomena, Academic Press, New York, 1972.
21. [21] B. Iooss, C. Lhuillier, H. Jeanneau, “Numerical simulation of transit-time ultrasonic flowmeters: uncertainties due to flow profile and fluid turbulence.”, Ultrasonics, vol.40.9, 2002, pp. 1009-1015.
22. [22] G. Jossinet, “Mesure du debit des liquides par debitmetre accrochable a ultrasons.”, NT EDF/DER, HP-12/91.26, 1991.