A Cost-Based Approach to Elicit Ancillary Service Tariffs from Unified Capacity and Energy Tariffs

Öz

Establishing separated markets for capacity, energy, and ancillary services (AS) is one of the key steps to liberalize electricity sector and realize electricity markets. This study aims at eliciting AS tariffs from unified capacity and energy tariffs through a cost-based approach. In the proposed framework, maintaining annual revenue requirements of the power plants are considered as the main objective while separating the AS tariff from unified tariffs. The conducted study considers two types of unified tariffs, i.e. capacity and energy tariffs, and offers proper AS eliciting scheme for each type of unified tariffs. The main challenges addressed here are: 1) incentivizing\penalizing AS provision more\less than scheduled amount which is tackled through an incentive factor, and 2) preventing overall tariff increment (customer tariff) after eliciting AS tariff which is addressed by applying fixing constraint to the overall tariff at before and after AS tariff eliciting conditions. Last but not the least, AS trade between adjacent utilities and calculating the benefits from this trade are addressed. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is assured through numerical investigations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ancillary Service
• Balancing market
• Frequency regulation
• Capacity Tariff
• Energy Tariff

Kaynakça

1. [1] Y. G. Rebours, D. S. Kirschen, M. Trotignon, and S. Rossignol, "A survey of frequency and voltage control ancillary services—Part I: Technical features," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 350-357, 2007.
2. [2] A. Zobian and M. D. Ilic, "Unbundling of transmission and ancillary services. I. Technical issues," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 539-548, 1997.
3. [3] Y. G. Rebours, D. S. Kirschen, M. Trotignon, and S. Rossignol, "A survey of frequency and voltage control ancillary services—Part II: Economic features," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 358-366, 2007.
4. [4] L. Meeus, K. Purchala, and R. Belmans, "Development of the internal electricity market in Europe," The Electricity Journal, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 25-35, 2005.
5. [5] K. Bhattacharya and J. Zhong, "Reactive power as an ancillary service," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 16, 2, pp. 294-300, 2001.
6. [6] R. Raineri, S. Rios, and D. Schiele, "Technical and economic aspects of ancillary services markets in the electric power industry: an international comparison," Energy policy, vol. 34, no. 13, pp. 1540-1555, 2006.
7. [7] O. B. Tör, M.E. Cebeci, M. Stojkovic, D. Orlic, C. Godfrey, G. Wray, et al., "Sub-Regional Direct Benefits from Cross-Border Provision of Balancing Energy and Reserves at Black Sea Region Based on Market-Based and Cost-Based Approaches," presented at the CIGRE RSEEC October 2018.
8. [8] E. Ela, A. Tuohy, M. Milligan, B. Kirby, and D. Brooks, "Alternative approaches for incentivizing the frequency responsive reserve ancillary service," The Electricity Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 88-102, 2012.

9. [9] H. Singh and A. Papalexopoulos, "Competitive procurement of ancillary services by an independent system operator," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 498-504, 1999.
10. [10] M. B. Zammit, D. J. Hill, and R. J. Kaye, "Designing ancillary services markets for power system security," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 675-680, 2000.
11. [11] I. De la Fuente, D. Soler, G. Relaño, O. Largo, T. Gómez, R. Martínez, et al., "F. Remuneration Framework and Cost Allocation Methodology for AGC Ancillary Services Markets," in Power System Computation Conference PSCC, 1999.
12. [12] A. Zobian and M. D. Ilic, "Unbundling of transmission and ancillary services. II. Cost-based pricing framework," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 549-558, 1997.
13. [13] S. F. Tierney, T. Schatzki, and R. Mukerji, "Uniform-pricing versus pay-as-bid in wholesale electricity markets: does it make a difference?," New York ISO, 2008.
14. [14] J. E. Bowring, "The evolution of PJM's capacity market," in Competitive Electricity Markets, ed: Elsevier, 2008, pp. 363-386.
15. [15] U. EIA, "Capital cost estimates for utility scale electricity generating plants," US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Parts on PHP and batteries http://www. eia. gov/analysis/studies/powerplants/capitalcost/pdf/capcost_assumption. pdf, 2016.
16. [16] M. Scherer, M. Zima, and G. Andersson, "An integrated pan-European ancillary services market for frequency control," Energy policy, vol. 62, pp. 292-300, 2013.
17. [17] R. Tidball, J. Bluestein, N. Rodriguez, and S. Knoke, "Cost and performance assumptions for modeling electricity generation technologies," National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States)2010.
18. [18] E. N. o. T. S. Operators, "Network Code on Load‐Frequency Control and Reserves 6," 2013.
19. [19] B. Kirby, "Ancillary services: Technical and commercial insights," Retrieved October, vol. 4, p. 2012, 2007.