The effect of different earthquake ground motion level on performance of reinforced-concrete structures

Yıl 2021, , 29 - 35, 20.12.2021

Ercan Işık , Eyyüp Demirkran

https://doi.org/10.17678/beuscitech.952812

Cited By: 1

Öz

Four different earthquake ground motion levels with different probabilities of exceedance were expressed with the current seismic design code. In this study, earthquake-structural parameters were obtained by taking into account four different ground motion levels for four different provinces with different earthquake hazards. Structural analyses were carried out using different earthquake ground motion levels obtained for each province. In the structural analysis, a sample reinforced-concrete structure with the same structural characteristics was selected. The results were obtained by using both ground motion levels and design spectra for four provinces. With this study, both the earthquake hazard and the ground motion level change were examined separately. It was determined that the two variables significantly changed the target displacement values expected from the structure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Earthquake, Ground motion level, TBEC-2018, Site-Specific

Kaynakça

• Adar, K., Büyüksaraç, A., Işık, E., and Ulu, A.E., 2021. Comparison of 2007 and 2018 Seismic Codes in the Scope of Structural Analysis. European Journal of Science and Technology. Accepted paper.
• Ademovic, N., Hrasnica, M., and Oliveira, D.V., 2013. Pushover Analysis and Failure Pattern of a Typical Masonry Residential Building in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Engineering Structures, 50, 13-29.
• Aksoylu, C., Mobark, A., Arslan, M.H, and Erkan, İ.H., 2020. A Comparative Study on ASCE 7-16, TBEC-2018 and TEC-2007 for Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Revista de la Construcción, 19(2), 282-305.
• Aksoylu, C., and Arslan, M.H., 2021. 2007 ve 2019 Deprem Yönetmeliklerinde Betonarme Binalar İçin Yer Alan Farklı Deprem Kuvveti Hesaplama Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılmalı Olarak İrdelenmesi. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 13(2), 359-374.
• Aksoylu, C. and M.H. Arslan 2019. Çerçeve Türü Betonarme Binaların Periyod Hesaplarının Farklı Ampirik Bağıntılara Göre İrdelenmesi. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 8(2), 569-581.
• Available online: https://tdth.afad.gov.tr (accessed on 2 May 2021).
• Başaran, V., 2018. Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliğine (TBDY2019) göre Afyonkarahisar için Deprem Yüklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 18(3), 1028-1035.
• Başaran, V., and Hiçyilmaz, M., 2020. Betonarme Çerçevelerde Farklı Deprem Yer Hareketi Düzeyi Etkilerinin İncelenmesi. Journal of Innovations in Civil Engineering and Technology, 2(1), 27-41.
• Bilgin, H., and Frangu, I., 2017. Predicting the Seismic Performance of Typical R/C Healthcare Facilities: Emphasis on Hospitals. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 9(3), 277-292.
• Bozer, A., 2020. Tasarım Spektral İvme Katsayılarının DBYBHY 2007 ve TBDY 2018 Yönetmeliklerine Göre Karşılaştırması. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 11(1), 393-404.
• Buyuksarac, A., Isik, E., and Harirchian, E., 2021. A Case Study for Determination of Seismic Risk Priorities in Van (Eastern Turkey). Earthquakes and Structures, 20(4), 445-455.
• EN 1998-3 (2005). Eurocode-8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings; European Committee for Standardization: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2005.
• Estêvão, J. M., and Oliveira, C.S. 2015. A new analysis method for structural failure evaluation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 56, 573-584
• Işık, E., Harirchian, E., Bilgin, H., Jadhav, K., 2021. The Effect of Material Strength and Discontinuity in RC Structures According to Different Site-Specific Design Spectra. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, accepted paper.
• Işık, E., Ekinci, Y.L., Sayil, N., Buyuksarac, A., and Aydin, M.C., 2021. Time-dependent Model for Earthquake Occurrence and Effects of Design Spectra on Structural Performance: A Case Study from the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 30(2), 215-234.
• Işık, E., Büyüksaraç, A., Ekinci, Y.L., Aydın, M. C., and Harirchian, E., 2020. The Effect of Site-Specific Design Spectrum on Earthquake-Building Parameters: A Case Study from the Marmara Region (NW Turkey). Applied Sciences, 10(20), 7247.
• Işık, E., Kutanis, M., and Bal, İ E., 2016. Displacement of the Buildings According to Site-Specific Earthquake Spectra. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 60(1), 37-43.
• Karakaš, N., Kalman Šipoš, T., and Hadzima-Nyarko, M., 2018. Application of Different Seismic Analyses to RC Structures. Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS, 9(17), 39-51.
• Karasin, İ.B., Işık, E., Demirci, A., and Aydin, M.C., 2020. Coğrafi Konuma Özel Tasarım Spektrumlarının Betonarme Yapı Performansına Etkisi. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 11(3), 1319-1330.
• Keskin, E., and Bozdoğan, K.B., 2018. 2007 ve 2018 Deprem Yönetmeliklerinin Kirklareli İli Özelinde Değerlendirilmesi. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 74-90.
• Koçer, M., Nakipoğlu, A., Öztürk, B., Al-hagri, M.G., and Arslan, M.H., 2018. Deprem Kuvvetine Esas Spektral İvme Değerlerinin TBDY 2018 ve TDY 2007’ye göre Karşilaştirilmasi. Selçuk-Teknik Dergisi, 17(2), 43-58.
• Kutanis, M., Ulutaş, H., and Işik, E., 2018. PSHA of Van Province for Performance Assessment Using Spectrally Matched Strong Ground Motion Records. Journal of Earth System Science, 127(7), 1-14.
• Nemutlu, Ö.F. and Sarı, A., 2018. Comparison of Turkish Earthquake Code in 2007 with Turkish Earthquake Code in 2018. International Engineering and Natural Sciences Conference (IENSC 2018), Diyarbakır.
• Pinto, P.E.; Franchin, P., 2011. Eurocode 8-Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. In Proceedings of the Eurocode 8 Background and Applications, Dissemination of Information for Training, Lisbon, Portugal.
• Seismosoft. SeismoStruct 2018–A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures. 2018. Available online: http://www.seismosoft.com
• Seyrek, E., 2020. Yeni Türkiye Sismik Tehlike Haritasinin Ege Bölgesi için Değerlendirilmesi. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 414-423.
• TBEC-2018. Turkish Building Earthquake Code; T.C. Resmi Gazete: Ankara, Turkey, 2018.
• TSDC-2007. Turkish Seismic Design Code; T.C. Resmi Gazete: Ankara, Turkey, 2007.
• Ulutaş, H., 2019. DBYBHY (2007) ve TBDY (2018) Deprem Yönetmeliklerinin Kesit Hasar Sınırları Açısından Kıyaslanması. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (17), 351-359.
• Yalin, M., and Ulutaş, H., 2021. Mevcut Okul Türü bir Binanın Deprem Performansının 2007 ve 2018 Deprem Yönetmeliklerine göre Değerlendirilmesi. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 1-1.