Impact on the building performance of subsequently cast concrete

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 7 - 11, 14.06.2017

İbrahim Baran Karaşin Ercan Işık

https://doi.org/10.17678/beuscitech.305748

Cited By: 1

Öz

There are many examples about building stock grows uncontrollably and irregularly in Turkey which is called unplanned urbanization. A serious part of this building stock which is growing uncontrolled is created by the structures called '' slum ''. In this type of construction, the quality of the used concrete is low as well as poor workmanship. Over time, when these structures become inadequate to serve the purpose, additional floors are being constructed, either controlled or uncontrolled. In this study, it was tried to determine the effect of the concrete quality used in the later constructed floors and the concrete classes used in the original construction on the building performance. For this purpose, a 5 storey reinforced concrete structure; It is aimed to determine the structural performance of the C14 and C25 concrete classes using different floors and different variations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Concrete Class, Pushover Analysis, Building Performance, Subsequently Cast Concrete

Kaynakça

• Aydınoğlu, M. N., 2007. A response spectrum-based nonlinear assessment tool for practice: incremental response spectrum analysis (IRSA), ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 44(1), 169-192. DBYBHY., 2007. Deprem Bölgelerinde Yapılacak Binalar Hakkında Yönetmelik. Tc Çevre Ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Deprem Araştırma Dairesi. Doran, B., Akbaş, B., Sayım, İ., Fahjan, Y., and Alacalı, S.,N., 2011. Uzun periyotlu bir yapıda yapısal sağlık izlemesi ve deprem performansının belirlenmesi, 1. Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı,Ankara Işık, E., 2016 a. Effects of Material Strength on Structural Performance of Damaged RC Buildings., Bitlis Eren Univ J Sci & Technol 6 (1), 22-25, Estêvão, J. M., and Oliveira, C. S. 2015. A new analysis method for structural failure evaluation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 56, 573-584. Inel, M., and Meral, E. 2016. Seismic performance of RC buildings subjected to past earthquakes in Turkey. Earthquakes and Structures, 11(3), 483-503. Inel, M., Bilgin, H., and Özmen, H. B. 2007. Orta Yükseklikteki Betonarme Binaların Deprem Performanslarının Afet Yönetmeliğine Göre Tayini. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(1), 81-89. Işık, E., 2016 b. Consistency of the rapid assessment method for reinforced concrete buildings, EarthquakesandStructures,Vol. 11, No. 5(2016) 873-885, , Krawinkler, H., and Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. 1998. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Engineering structures, 20(4), 452-464. Kutanis, M., and Boru, O.,E., 2014. The need for upgrading the seismic performance objectives, Earthquakes and Structures, 7(4), 401-414. Uğurlu, A., 2013. Depremde beton ve davranışı. İmo Mühendislik Haberleri 476: 58, Ersoy, U.,and Özcebe, G. 2007. Betonarme: temel ilkeler, TS-500-2000 ve Türk deprem yönetmeliğine (1998) göre hesap. Evrim Yayınevi. Computers and Structures, 2011. Sap2000 15.1.0. Berkeley. SeismoStruct v6.5 2013, A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Seismosoft