Evaluation of Barriers on Sustainable Manufacturing in Supply Chains with the Full Consistency Method (FUCOM)

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 298 - 318, 30.10.2022

Gülşah Sezen Akar

https://doi.org/10.38057/bifd.1177985

Cited By: 6

Öz

Sustainable manufacturing in supply chains gains importance in today’s competitive environment in terms of dependence on natural resources, creating carbon emissions and generating waste. The negative effects of climate change such as floods, droughts and forest fires in many countries of the world increase the sensitivity of consumers to use products that are produced sensitive to environment, people and society. This study aims to identify and prioritize the barriers on sustainable manufacturing for an agricultural machinery manufacturing firm. FUCOM multi-criteria decision-making method was used to prioritize these barriers in economic, environmental, social and non-organizational categories. As a result of calculations; high capital costs, low investment returns and funds gap are detected as most important criteria. Prioritization of barriers from different perspectives is expected to help decision/policy makers in government and industry to mitigate these barriers effectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainability, Machine Manufacturing Sector, Multi Criteria Decision Making, Supply Chain Management, FUCOM

Tedarik Zincirlerinde Sürdürülebilir İmalatın Önündeki Engelleyici Faktörlerin Tam Tutarlılık Yöntemiyle (FUCOM) Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Tedarik zincirlerinde sürdürülebilir imalat, doğal kaynaklara bağımlılık, karbon emisyonu yaratma ve atık üretme bakımından günümüz rekabet ortamında önem kazanmaktadır. İklim değişikliğinin, dünyanın birçok ülkesinde sel, kuraklık, orman yangınları gibi olumsuz etkileri tüketicilerin çevreye, insana, topluma duyarlı üretilmiş ürün kullanma hassasiyetini artırmaktadır. Bu çalışma, bir tarım makineleri imalat işletmesi için sürdürülebilir imalat uygulamasının önündeki engelleri belirlemeyi ve önceliklendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu engelleri ekonomik, çevresel, sosyal ve organizasyon dışı kategorilerde önceliklendirmek için FUCOM çok kriterli karar verme yönteminden faydalanılmıştır. Yapılan hesaplamalar sonucunda, yüksek yatırım maliyetleri, düşük yatırım getirisi ve finansal fon eksikliği en önemli kriterler olarak tespit edilmiştir. Engellerin farklı açılardan önceliklendirilmesinin, hükümet ve sektördeki karar/politika yapıcıların bu engelleri etkili bir şekilde azaltmalarına yardımcı olması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilirlik, Makine İmalat Sektörü, Çok kriterli karar verme, Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, FUCOM

Kaynakça

• Abualfaraa, W., Salonitis, K., Al-Ashaab, A., & Ala’raj, M. (2020). Lean-green manufacturing practices and their link with sustainability: A critical review. Sustainability, 12(3), 981.
• Alayón, C. L., Säfsten, K., & Johansson, G. (2022). Barriers and enablers for the adoption of sustainable manufacturing by manufacturing smes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042364
• Alsanad, S. (2018). Barriers to ımplementation sustainable cement manufacturing in kuwait. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p317
• Ayçin, E., & Aşan, H. (2021). İş zekası uygulamaları seçimindeki kriterlerin önem ağırlıklarının FUCOM yöntemi ile belirlenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.33707/akuiibfd.903563.
• Bhanot, N., Rao, P. V., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2015). Enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing: Results from a survey of researchers and industry professionals. Procedia CIRP, 29, 562–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.036
• Bhanot, N., Rao, P. V., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2017). An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4412–4439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.123
• BİST (2022), Sürdürülebilirlik endeksi. https://borsaistanbul.com/tr/sayfa/165/bist-surdurulebilirlik-endeksi
• Chun, Y., & Bidanda, B. (2013). Sustainable manufacturing and the role of the International Journal of Production Research. International Journal of Production Research, 51(23–24), 7448–7455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.762135
• Cılız, N., Daylan, B., & Baydar, G. (2011). Sürdürülebilir Üretim ve Tüketim Yayınları-II, Temiz Üretim. Ankara, Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı.
• Deepak, M., Haq, A. N., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2014). Identification of pressures, barriers and drivers for the implementation of green supply chain management. In 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014), Assam, India.
• Durmić, E. (2019). Evaluation of criteria for sustainable supplier selection using FUCOM method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 91-107.
• Ecer F. (2020). FUCOM sübjektif ağırlıklandırma yöntemi ile rüzgâr çiftliği yer seçimini etkileyen faktörlerin analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(1), 24-34.
• Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbašić, A., & Stević, Ž. (2019). FUCOM method in group decision making: Selection of forklift in a warehouse. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901065f
• Garetti, M., & Taisch, M. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing: Trends and research challenges. Production Planning and Control, 23(2–3), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.591619
• Ghazilla, R. A. R., Sakundarini, N., Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Ayub, N. S., Olugu, E. U., & Musa, S. N. (2015). Drivers and barriers analysis for green manufacturing practices in Malaysian smes: A preliminary findings. Procedia CIRP, 26, 658–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.085
• Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.011
• Gupta, H., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Barriers and overcoming strategies to supply chain sustainability innovation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161(November 2019), 104819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104819
• Hariyani, D., Mishra, S., Sharma, M. K., & Hariyani, P. (2022). Organizational barriers to the sustainable manufacturing system: A literature review. Environmental Challenges, 9(May), 100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100606
• Hartmann, J., & Moeller, S. (2014). Chain liability in multitier supply chains? Responsibility attributions for unsustainable supplier behavior. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.01.005
• Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Gupta, S., Dangayach, G. S., Sharma, M., & Sohag, M. A. Z. (2020). Modelling of sustainable manufacturing barriers in pharmaceutical ındustries of himachal pradesh: an ısm-fuzzy approach. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 174(June), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2647-3_15
• Joung, C. B., Carrell, J., Sarkar, P., & Feng, S. C. (2012). Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecological Indicators, 24, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.030
• Koho, M., Torvinen, S., & Romiguer, A. T. (2011, May). Objectives, enablers and challenges of sustainable development and sustainable manufacturing: Views and opinions of Spanish companies. In 2011 IEEE international symposium on assembly and manufacturing (ISAM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
• Machado, C. G., Winroth, M. P., & Ribeiro da Silva, E. H. D. (2019). Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda, International Journal of Production Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1652777
• Malek, J., & Desai, T. N. (2019). Prioritization of sustainable manufacturing barriers using Best Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.056
• Malek, J., & Desai, T. N. (2020). A systematic literature review to map literature focus of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120345
• Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., NoorulHaq, A., & Geng, Y. (2013). An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.042
• Mittal VK, Sangwan KS, Herrmann C, Egede P. & Nee, Song and Ong (Eds) (2013). Comparison of Drivers and Barriers to Green Manufacturing: A Case of India and Germany. Re-engineering Manufacturing for Sustainability, Springer, Singapore
• Mittal, V. K., & Sangwan, K. S. (2014). Prioritizing barriers to green manufacturing: Environmental, social and economic perspectives. Procedia CIRP, 17, 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.075
• Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Rajesh, R., & Paul, S. K. (2018). Modeling the interrelationships among barriers to sustainable supply chain management in leather industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.245
• Moldavska, A., & Welo, T. (2017). The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: A content-analysis based literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006
• Moshood, T. D., Nawanir, G., Mahmud, F., Sorooshian, S., & Adeleke, A. Q. (2021). Green and low carbon matters: A systematic review of the past, today, and future on sustainability supply chain management practices among manufacturing industry. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100144
• Mutingi, M., Musiyarira, H., Mbohwa, C., & Kommula, V. P. (2017, 25-27 Ekim). An analysis of enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing in Southern Africa. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science , 2, 25-28).
• Oğuzhan, Y. (2018). Sürdürülebilir üretimi teşvik eden ve sınırlandıran faktörlerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir alan araştırması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 73(2), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1501/sbfder_0000002506
• Paju, M., Heilala, J., Hentula, M., Heikkilä, A., Johansson, B., Leong, S., & Lyons, K. (2010, December). Framework and indicators for a sustainable manufacturing mapping methodology. In Proceedings of the 2010 winter simulation conference (pp. 3411-3422). IEEE.
• Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determiningweight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). Symmetry, 10(9), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393
• Rosen, M. A., & Kishawy, H. A. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing and design: Concepts, practices and needs. Sustainability, 4(2), 154-174. doi:10.3390/su4020154.
• Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
• Silvestre, B. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management: current debate and future directions. Gestão & Produção, 23, 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X2202-16.
• Singh, S., Olugu, E. U., & Musa, S. N. (2016). Development of Sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation expert system for small and medium enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 40, 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.142
• Tanco, M., Kalemkerian, F., & Santos, J. (2021). Main challenges involved in the adoption of sustainable manufacturing in Uruguayan small and medium sized companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126139
• Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2021). Yeşil Mutabakat Eylem Planı. https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/60f1200013b876eb28421b23/MUTABAKAT%20YE%C5%9E%C4%B0L.pdf
• Wu, H., Lv, K., Liang, L., & Hu, H. (2017). Measuring performance of sustainable manufacturing with recyclable wastes: A case from China’s iron and steel industry. Omega (United Kingdom), 66, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.01.009
• Abdullah, A., Ahmad, S., Athar, M. A., Rajpoot, N., & Talib, F. (2022). Healthcare performance management using integrated FUCOM‐MARCOS approach: The case of India. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 37(5), 2635-2668. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3488
• Böyükaslan, A., & Ecer, F. (2021). Determination of drivers for investing in cryptocurrencies through a fuzzy full consistency method-Bonferroni (FUCOM-F’B) framework. Technology in Society, 67, 101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101745
• Hoan, P., & Ha, Y. (2021). ARAS-FUCOM approach for VPAF fighter aircraft selection. Decision Science Letters, 10(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2020.10.004
• Khan, A. U., Ali, Y., Pamucar, D., & Vasa, L. (2022). Risk management for cold supply chain: Case of a developing country. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 19(8).
• Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., & Deveci, M. (2021). Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. Science of The Total Environment, 788, 147763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147763
• Vukasović, D., Gligović, D., Terzić, S., Stević, Ž., & Macura, P. (2021). A novel fuzzy MCDM model for inventory management in order to increase business efficiency. Technological and economic development of economy, 27(2), 386-401. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14427