Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kurtuluş Deresi (Perşembe-Ordu)'nde yaşayan Capoeta banarescui Türünün Kondisyon Faktörü, Boy-Ağırlık ve Boy-Boy İlişkileri

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 79 - 87, 24.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.996257

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kurtuluş Deresi (Perşembe-Ordu)’nde yaşayan Capoeta banarescui bireylerinin kondisyon faktörü, boy-boy ve boy-ağırlık ilişkileri gibi bazı temel popülasyon özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmamız kapsamında Ordu ili Perşembe ilçesinde bulunan Kurtuluş Deresi’nden elektroşoker yardımıyla 60 adet C. banarescui bireyi örneklenmiştir. Balık örneklerinin ortalama standart, çatal ve total boyları sırasıyla 11,097±0,475 cm, 12,082±0,477 cm ve 13,075±0,494 cm, ortalama ağırlıkları ise 33,08±3,69 g arasında olduğu belirlenmiştir. Türün boy-ağırlık ilişkisi denklemi ile W=0,0082TB3,1294 (R2=0,99) olarak hesaplanmıştır. Analizlerimiz sonucunda da Kurtuluş Deresi’ndeki C. banarescui popülasyonunun pozitif allometrik bir büyüme gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Çalışmamızda boy-ağırlık ilişki denklemindeki b değerinin %95 güven aralığının 3,1187-3,1362 arasında olduğu ve total boy ve ağırlık arasında kuvvetli bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Total, çatal ve standart boylar arasında ilişki denklemleri TB=1,0334ÇB+0,5895(R2=0,99), TB=1,036SB+1,5793 (R2=0,99), ve ÇB=1,0034SB+0,9475 (R2=0,99) olarak hesaplanmış ve Kurtuluş Deresi’nde yaşayan C. banarescui bireylerinin total, çatal ve standart boy ölçümleri arasında oldukça kuvvetli ilişkiler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. C. banarescui türünün kondisyon faktörü değerlerinin 0,9298-1,3767 aralığında değiştiği ve ortalama kondisyon faktörünün ise 1,1364±0,0132 olduğu belirlenmiştir. C. banarescui türünün Kurtuluş Deresi’nde yaşayan popülasyonu üzerine daha önce yapılmış bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmada C. banarescui türünün bu habitattaki kondisyon faktörü, boy-ağırlık ve boy-boy ilişkileri ilk defa rapor edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • [1] Yedier S, Kontaş S, Bostancı D, 2020. Length-length and length-weight relationships of lessepsian Saurida undosquamis from the İskenderun Bay, Turkey (Eastern Mediterranean). Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10(1): 616-623. Doi: 10.21597/jist.551092
  • [2] Steinfeld H, Gerber PJ, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C, 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options; FAO: Rome, Italy,
  • [3] Ricker WA, 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191, 382.
  • [4] Bagenal TB, Tesch FW, 1978. Age and Growth. In T. Bagenal (Ed), Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters, 3rd ed: IBP Handbook No.3, Blackwell Science Publications, Oxford.
  • [5] Froese R, Pauly D, 1998. Fishbase 1998: concepts, design and data sources. ICLARM, Manila.
  • [6] Froese R, 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253.
  • [7] Mbaru EK, Kimani EN, Otwoma LM, Kimeli A, Mkare TK, 2011. Abundance, length-weight relationship and condition factor in selected reef fishes of Kenyan marine artisanal fishery. Advanced Journal of Food Science and Technology, 3(1): 1-8.
  • [8] Kırankaya ŞG, Ekmekçi FG, Özdilek ŞY, Yoğurtçuoğlu B, Gençoğlu L, 2014. Condition, length-weight and length-length relationships for five fish species from Hirfanlı Reservoir, Turkey, Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 8(3): 208-213.
  • [9] Yedier S, Kontaş S, Bostancı D, 2019. Condition factor, length-length and length-weight relationships for Pagellus acarne inhabiting the Sea of Marmara. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 4(2): 82-88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.54200
  • [10] Yılmaz S, Yazıcıoğlu O, Erbaşaran M, Esen S, Zengin M, Polat N, 2012. Length-weight relationship and relative condition factor of white bream, Blicca bjoerkna (L., 1758), from Lake Lâdik, Turkey. Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, 18: 380-387.
  • [11] Kara A, Sağlam C, Acarli D, Cengız Ö, 2018. Length-weight relationships for 48 fish species of the Gediz estuary, in İzmir Bay (Central Aegean Sea, Turkey). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98(4), 879-884. doi:10.1017/S0025315416001879
  • [12] Petrakis G, Stergiou KI, 1995. Weight-length relationships for 33 fish species in Greek waters. Fisheries Research, 21(3-4): 465-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)00294-7
  • [13] Sivashanthini K, 2008. Length-weight relationships and condition of Gerreids (Pisces: Gerreidae) from the Parangipettai waters (SE coast of India). Asian Fisheries Science, 21: 405-419.
  • [14] Baitha R, Sinha A, Koushlesh SK, Chanu TN, Kumari K, Gogoi P, Ramteke MH, Borah S, Das BK, 2018. Length-weight relationship of ten indigenous freshwater fish species from Gandak River, Bihar, India. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 34(1): 233-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13555
  • [15] Tesch FW, 1971. Age and growth. In: W.E. Ricker (Ed.). Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. pp. 98-130.
  • [16] Korkmaz AŞ, 2011. Popülasyon Dinamiği, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, 549 s.
  • [17] Saygın S, Özpiçak M, Aydın A, Hançer E, Yılmaz S, Polat N, 2018. Length-weight and length-length relationships of the European bitterling, Rhodeus amarus (Bloch, 1782) inhabiting inland waters of Samsun province. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(2): 201-210.
  • [18] Bostancı D, Yedier S, Kontaş S, Kurucu G, Polat N, 2017. Length-weight, length-length relationships and condition factors of some fish species in Yalıköy Stream (Ordu-Turkey). Aquaculture Studies, 17: 375-383.
  • [19] Özpiçak M, Saygın S, Hançer E, Aydın A, Yılmaz S, Polat N, 2018. Length-weight and length-length relationships of chub (Squalius cephalus, L., 1758) inhabiting a few inland waters of the Middle Black Sea Region. Ege Journal Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 35(2): 175-179.
  • [20]Turan D, Kottelat M, Ekmekci FG, Imamoglu HO, 2006. A review of Capoeta tinca, with descriptions of two new species from Turkey (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 113(2): 421-436.
  • [21] Banarescu PM, 1999. The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Volume 5. Cyprinidae 2. Part I: Rhodeus to Capoeta. AULA-Verlag, Wiebelsheim. 427 p.
  • [22] Froese R, Pauly D, 2020. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Available from: www.fishbase.org. Accessed 15 March 2020.
  • [23]Zar JH, 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 663p.
  • [24]Keskin G, 2013. Aşağı Melet Irmağı’nda (Ordu) yaşayan Capoeta banarescui’nun yaş, büyüme ve otolit özellikleri, Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Biyoloji Anabilim, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • [25]Mazlum RE, Turan D, Bilgin S, 2015. Length-weight relationships of nine Cyprinid species from inland waters of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 15: 375-378. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v15_2_22
  • [26]Patimar R, Mohammadzadeh B., 2010. On the biological characteristics of Capoeta fusca Nikolskii, 1897 in eastern Iran. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1439 0426.2010.01572.x
  • [27] Yedier S, Bostancı D, Polat N, 2021. Some population characteristics of Oxynoemacheilus angorae (Steindachner, 1897) from Perşembe Plateau Meandering Streams in Ordu-Turkey. Fisheries & Aquatic Life, 29(2): 100-107. Doi: 10.2478/aopf-2021-0012
  • [28]Moutopoulos DK, Stergiou KI, 2002. Length-weight and length-length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 18(3): 200-203. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x
  • [29]Wang LJ, You F, Wang QX, Wul ZH, Liu MX, 2015. Length-weight and length-length relationships of 11 fish species from Zhimai River estuary, China. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 31: 435-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12692
  • [30]Le Cren ED, 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle ingonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal Animal Ecology, 20: 201-219.
  • [31] Tsoumani M, Liasko R, Moutsaki P, Kagalou I, Leonardos I, 2006. Length-weight relationships of an invasive cyprinid fish (Carassius gibelio) from 12 Greek lakes in relation to their trophic states. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 281-284.
  • [32]Erkoyuncu İ, 1995. Balıkçılık biyolojisi ve popülasyon dinamiği. Ondokuzmayıs Üniversitesi Yayınları, Yayın No:95, Sinop, 265s.

Condition Factor, Length-Weight and Length-Length Relationships of Capoeta banarescui living in Kurtuluş Stream (Perşembe-Ordu)

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 79 - 87, 24.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.996257

Öz

Kaynakça

  • [1] Yedier S, Kontaş S, Bostancı D, 2020. Length-length and length-weight relationships of lessepsian Saurida undosquamis from the İskenderun Bay, Turkey (Eastern Mediterranean). Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10(1): 616-623. Doi: 10.21597/jist.551092
  • [2] Steinfeld H, Gerber PJ, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C, 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options; FAO: Rome, Italy,
  • [3] Ricker WA, 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191, 382.
  • [4] Bagenal TB, Tesch FW, 1978. Age and Growth. In T. Bagenal (Ed), Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters, 3rd ed: IBP Handbook No.3, Blackwell Science Publications, Oxford.
  • [5] Froese R, Pauly D, 1998. Fishbase 1998: concepts, design and data sources. ICLARM, Manila.
  • [6] Froese R, 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253.
  • [7] Mbaru EK, Kimani EN, Otwoma LM, Kimeli A, Mkare TK, 2011. Abundance, length-weight relationship and condition factor in selected reef fishes of Kenyan marine artisanal fishery. Advanced Journal of Food Science and Technology, 3(1): 1-8.
  • [8] Kırankaya ŞG, Ekmekçi FG, Özdilek ŞY, Yoğurtçuoğlu B, Gençoğlu L, 2014. Condition, length-weight and length-length relationships for five fish species from Hirfanlı Reservoir, Turkey, Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 8(3): 208-213.
  • [9] Yedier S, Kontaş S, Bostancı D, 2019. Condition factor, length-length and length-weight relationships for Pagellus acarne inhabiting the Sea of Marmara. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 4(2): 82-88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.54200
  • [10] Yılmaz S, Yazıcıoğlu O, Erbaşaran M, Esen S, Zengin M, Polat N, 2012. Length-weight relationship and relative condition factor of white bream, Blicca bjoerkna (L., 1758), from Lake Lâdik, Turkey. Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, 18: 380-387.
  • [11] Kara A, Sağlam C, Acarli D, Cengız Ö, 2018. Length-weight relationships for 48 fish species of the Gediz estuary, in İzmir Bay (Central Aegean Sea, Turkey). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98(4), 879-884. doi:10.1017/S0025315416001879
  • [12] Petrakis G, Stergiou KI, 1995. Weight-length relationships for 33 fish species in Greek waters. Fisheries Research, 21(3-4): 465-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)00294-7
  • [13] Sivashanthini K, 2008. Length-weight relationships and condition of Gerreids (Pisces: Gerreidae) from the Parangipettai waters (SE coast of India). Asian Fisheries Science, 21: 405-419.
  • [14] Baitha R, Sinha A, Koushlesh SK, Chanu TN, Kumari K, Gogoi P, Ramteke MH, Borah S, Das BK, 2018. Length-weight relationship of ten indigenous freshwater fish species from Gandak River, Bihar, India. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 34(1): 233-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13555
  • [15] Tesch FW, 1971. Age and growth. In: W.E. Ricker (Ed.). Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. pp. 98-130.
  • [16] Korkmaz AŞ, 2011. Popülasyon Dinamiği, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, 549 s.
  • [17] Saygın S, Özpiçak M, Aydın A, Hançer E, Yılmaz S, Polat N, 2018. Length-weight and length-length relationships of the European bitterling, Rhodeus amarus (Bloch, 1782) inhabiting inland waters of Samsun province. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(2): 201-210.
  • [18] Bostancı D, Yedier S, Kontaş S, Kurucu G, Polat N, 2017. Length-weight, length-length relationships and condition factors of some fish species in Yalıköy Stream (Ordu-Turkey). Aquaculture Studies, 17: 375-383.
  • [19] Özpiçak M, Saygın S, Hançer E, Aydın A, Yılmaz S, Polat N, 2018. Length-weight and length-length relationships of chub (Squalius cephalus, L., 1758) inhabiting a few inland waters of the Middle Black Sea Region. Ege Journal Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 35(2): 175-179.
  • [20]Turan D, Kottelat M, Ekmekci FG, Imamoglu HO, 2006. A review of Capoeta tinca, with descriptions of two new species from Turkey (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 113(2): 421-436.
  • [21] Banarescu PM, 1999. The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Volume 5. Cyprinidae 2. Part I: Rhodeus to Capoeta. AULA-Verlag, Wiebelsheim. 427 p.
  • [22] Froese R, Pauly D, 2020. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Available from: www.fishbase.org. Accessed 15 March 2020.
  • [23]Zar JH, 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 663p.
  • [24]Keskin G, 2013. Aşağı Melet Irmağı’nda (Ordu) yaşayan Capoeta banarescui’nun yaş, büyüme ve otolit özellikleri, Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Biyoloji Anabilim, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • [25]Mazlum RE, Turan D, Bilgin S, 2015. Length-weight relationships of nine Cyprinid species from inland waters of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 15: 375-378. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v15_2_22
  • [26]Patimar R, Mohammadzadeh B., 2010. On the biological characteristics of Capoeta fusca Nikolskii, 1897 in eastern Iran. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1439 0426.2010.01572.x
  • [27] Yedier S, Bostancı D, Polat N, 2021. Some population characteristics of Oxynoemacheilus angorae (Steindachner, 1897) from Perşembe Plateau Meandering Streams in Ordu-Turkey. Fisheries & Aquatic Life, 29(2): 100-107. Doi: 10.2478/aopf-2021-0012
  • [28]Moutopoulos DK, Stergiou KI, 2002. Length-weight and length-length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 18(3): 200-203. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x
  • [29]Wang LJ, You F, Wang QX, Wul ZH, Liu MX, 2015. Length-weight and length-length relationships of 11 fish species from Zhimai River estuary, China. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 31: 435-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12692
  • [30]Le Cren ED, 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle ingonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal Animal Ecology, 20: 201-219.
  • [31] Tsoumani M, Liasko R, Moutsaki P, Kagalou I, Leonardos I, 2006. Length-weight relationships of an invasive cyprinid fish (Carassius gibelio) from 12 Greek lakes in relation to their trophic states. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 281-284.
  • [32]Erkoyuncu İ, 1995. Balıkçılık biyolojisi ve popülasyon dinamiği. Ondokuzmayıs Üniversitesi Yayınları, Yayın No:95, Sinop, 265s.
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Derya Bostancı 0000-0003-3052-9805

Serdar Yedıer 0000-0003-0017-3502

Nazmi Polat 0000-0001-9785-9927

Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Mart 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 16 Eylül 2021
Kabul Tarihi 28 Ocak 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

IEEE D. Bostancı, S. Yedıer, ve N. Polat, “Kurtuluş Deresi (Perşembe-Ordu)’nde yaşayan Capoeta banarescui Türünün Kondisyon Faktörü, Boy-Ağırlık ve Boy-Boy İlişkileri”, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 11, sy. 1, ss. 79–87, 2022, doi: 10.17798/bitlisfen.996257.



Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi
Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Editörlüğü

Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü        
Beş Minare Mah. Ahmet Eren Bulvarı, Merkez Kampüs, 13000 BİTLİS        
E-posta: fbe@beu.edu.tr