Writing A Research Paper

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 1 - 18, 01.06.2012

Nazmiye Gürel Cennetkusu

Öz

Writing a research paper in English as a foreign language for the first time is a challenging task for many international doctoral students. This study explores the challenges experienced and strategies utilized during the academic socialization process through research paper writing and within the framework of sociocultural theory. The results indicate that limited experience in research paper writing and personal writing style with cultural influence are the most challenging aspects. The utilized strategies suggest that dialog within the academic community is crucial for the success of graduate students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Academic Writing, Challenges, Strategies, Academic Socialization, Dialog

Kaynakça

• Aimes, R. (2001). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. In S. Tony & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.). Landmark Essays on ESL Writing (pp. 37-61). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Angelova, M. & Riazantseva, A. (1999). “If you don‟t tell me, how can I know?”: A case study of four international students learning to write the US way. Written Communication, 16, 4, 491-525.
• Armengo-Castells, L. (2001). Text-generating strategies of three multilingual writers: A protocol based study. Language Awareness, 10, 91-106.
• Ball, A. F., & Freedman, S. W. (2004). Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Basturkmen, H. & Lewis, M. (2002). Learner perspectives of success in an EAP writing course. Assessing Writing, 8, 31-46.
• Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertexualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literacy theory, and literacy studies. In A. F. Ball, & S. W. Freedman (Eds.). Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 53-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Braine, G. (2002). Academic literacy and the nonnative speaker graduate student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 59-68.
• Braxley, K. (2005). Mastering academic English: International graduate students‟ use of dialogue and speech genres to meet the writing demands of graduate school. In K. H. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (Eds.). Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning (pp. 11-32). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Cadman, K. (1997). Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 1, 3-14.
• Casanave, C. P. (2004). Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Cumming, A. (2001). Learning to write in a second language: Two decades of research. International Journal of English Studies, 1, 2, 1-23.
• Curry, M. J. & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 4, 663-688.
• Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native graduate students‟ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 4, 369-390.
• Ely, M. et al. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. New York: Routlegde Falmer.
• Ferris, D. R. (2004). The „grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
• Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 3, 243-264.
• Goldstein, L. M. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 63-80.
• Gosden, H. (1996). Verbal reports of Japanese novices‟ research writing practices in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 2, 109-128.
• Greenleaf, C. L., & Katz, M. L. (2004). Ever newer ways to mean: Authoring pedagogical change in secondary subject-area classrooms. In A. F. Ball, & S. W. Freedman (Eds.). Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 172-202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hall, K. H., Vitanova, G., & Marchenkova, L. (2005). Dialogue with Bakhtin on Second and Foreign Language Learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329-350. Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World. New York: Routledge.
• Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17-29.
• Ivanic, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18, 3, 220-245.
• Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
• Kubota, R. (1998). An investigation of L1-L2 transfer in writing among Japanese university students: Implications for contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7 (1), 69-100.
• Li, Y. (2007). Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: An intraview of an NNES graduate student writing a research article. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 1, 55- 79.
• Morris, P. (Ed.). (1994). The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, Voloshinov. London: Arnold.
• Morson, G. S. (2004). The process of ideological becoming. In A. F. Ball, & S. W. Freedman (Eds.). Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 317-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Orr, J. L. (2005). Dialogic investigations: Cultural artifacts in ESOL composition classes. In K. H. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (Eds.). Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning (pp. 55-76). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2006). Intercultural Communication: A Reader. Belmont, CA: Thomson & Wadsworth.
• Shohamy, E. (2006). Rethinking assessment for advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes, H. D. Weger-Guntharp, & K. Sprang (Eds.). Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment: Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (pp. 188-208). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
• Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly, 22, 1, 29-51.
• Spack, R. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14, 1, 3-62.
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.