Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 177 - 183, 08.06.2020

Öz

ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, femur boyun kırığı nedeniyle sementli veya sementsiz bipolar hemiartroplasti
ile tedavi edilmiş 65 yaş ve üstü hastalarda mortalite oranlarını geriye dönük olarak karşılaştırmak ve mortaliteyi
etkileyen faktörleri belirlemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: 2006 ve 2013 yılları arasında, 65 yaş ve üstü olup femur boyun kırığı teşhisiyle bipolar
hemiartroplasti ile tedavi edilen hastaların verileri geriye yönelik incelendi. Patolojik kırığı olan, aynı anda
birden çok yerde kırığı olan, yetersiz verisi olan ve takibi olmayan hastalar çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Tüm hastaların
başvuru anında yaşı, cinsiyeti, kırık tipleri, ek hastalık sayıları, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
skorları, ameliyata kadar beklediği süre hastanemiz elektronik kayıtlarından belirlendi. Ek olarak
anestezi tipi, ameliyat süresi, kan transfüzyon miktarı, toplam yatış süresi kayıtlardan incelendi. Hastalar
takipte ölenler ve sağ kalanlar olarak gruplandırıldı ve mortalite üzerine etkili temel demografik belirleyiciler
karşılaştırıldı.
Bulgular: Sementli veya sementsiz bipolar hemiartroplasti uygulanan hastalar klinik özelliklerine göre karşılaştırıldığında
sadece kırık tipi açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı fark saptandı (p=0.003). Takip süresince
104 hastadan 65 hasta sağ iken, 39 hasta ölmüştü. Sementli bipolar hemiartroplasti uygulanan hastalarda
mortalite oranı istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksekti (p=0.010). Demografik özelliklerden sadece
ileri yaşın (p=0.010) mortaliteyi anlamlı olarak artırdığı tespit edildi.
Sonuç: Bulgularımız ışığında sementli hemiartroplasti uygulamasının gerekli haller dışında ileri yaş hastalarda
mümkün olduğunca tercih edilmemesini öneriyoruz.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Hemiartroplasti; femur boyun kırıkları; mortalite oranı; yaşlı
ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the mortality rates and determine the factors
affecting mortality in patients aged 65 years or older treated with cemented or non-cemented bipolar
hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.
Material and Methods: The data of patients who were treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty between
the years of 2006 and 2013 with the diagnosis of femoral neck fracture aged 65 years and over were
retrospectively reviewed. Patients with pathological fractures, multiple fractures at the same time,
insufficient data and no follow-up were excluded from the study. The age, sex, fracture types, number
of additional diseases, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) scores of all patients at the time of
admission were determined from the electronic records of our hospital. In addition to that; anesthesia
type, operation time, blood transfusion amount, total hospitalization time were examined from records.
The patients were grouped as survivors and deceased, and the main demographic determinants of
mortality were compared.
Results: When the patients who underwent cemented or non-cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty were
compared according to their clinical characteristics, a significant difference was found only between the
groups in terms of fracture type (p = 0.003). During the follow-up period, 65 patients of 104 patients
were alive and 39 patients died. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with cemented bipolar
hemiarthroplasty (p = 0.010). According to demographic characteristics, only older age (p = 0.010)
significantly increased mortality.
Conclusion: In the light of our findings, we suggest that cemented hemiarthroplasty should not be preferred
as much as possible in elderly patients except when necessary.
Key Words: Hemiarthroplasty; femur neck fractures; mortality rate; elderly

Kaynakça

  • 1. Balcı MA, Şimşek Ç, Atay E, Ertekin A, Tahta Y. [Lumbar plexus block in fond elderly patient with hip surgery: Case Report]. Acta Med. Alanya. 2019;3(1):81-84. Turkish 2. Frandsen PA, Kruse T. Hip fractures in the county of Funen, Denmark: implications of demographic aging and changes in incidence rates. Acta Orthopaedica. 1983;54(5):681-686. 3. Lorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW, Appleby D, Lucchesi CA, Saleh KJ. Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;383:229-242. 4. Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(1):15-25. 5. Farahmand BY, Michaëlsson K, Ahlbom A, Ljunghall S, Baron JA; Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group. Survival after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1583-1590. 6. Schürch MA, Rizzoli R, Mermillod B, Vasey H, Michel JP, Bonjour JP. A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11(12):1935-1942. 7. Aharonoff GB, Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures in the elderly: predictors of one year mortality. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(3):162-165. 8. Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, Sledge CB. Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;(186):45-56. 9. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1493. Review. 10. Sircar P, Godkar D, Mahgerefteh S, Chambers K, Niranjan S, Cucco R. Morbidity and mortality among patients with hip fractures surgically repaired within and after 48 hours. Am J Ther. 2007;14(6):508-513.
Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 177 - 183, 08.06.2020

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Balcı MA, Şimşek Ç, Atay E, Ertekin A, Tahta Y. [Lumbar plexus block in fond elderly patient with hip surgery: Case Report]. Acta Med. Alanya. 2019;3(1):81-84. Turkish 2. Frandsen PA, Kruse T. Hip fractures in the county of Funen, Denmark: implications of demographic aging and changes in incidence rates. Acta Orthopaedica. 1983;54(5):681-686. 3. Lorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW, Appleby D, Lucchesi CA, Saleh KJ. Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;383:229-242. 4. Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(1):15-25. 5. Farahmand BY, Michaëlsson K, Ahlbom A, Ljunghall S, Baron JA; Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group. Survival after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1583-1590. 6. Schürch MA, Rizzoli R, Mermillod B, Vasey H, Michel JP, Bonjour JP. A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11(12):1935-1942. 7. Aharonoff GB, Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures in the elderly: predictors of one year mortality. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(3):162-165. 8. Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, Sledge CB. Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;(186):45-56. 9. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1493. Review. 10. Sircar P, Godkar D, Mahgerefteh S, Chambers K, Niranjan S, Cucco R. Morbidity and mortality among patients with hip fractures surgically repaired within and after 48 hours. Am J Ther. 2007;14(6):508-513.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Orjinal Çalışma
Yazarlar

Necati Emirhan Bu kişi benim

Akif Albayrak Bu kişi benim

İsmet Yalkın Çamurcu Bu kişi benim

Hanifi Üçpunar Bu kişi benim

Furkan Yapıcı Bu kişi benim

Adem Çöbden Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 8 Haziran 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Emirhan, N., Albayrak, A., Çamurcu, İ. Y., Üçpunar, H., vd. (2020). 65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, 10(2), 177-183.
AMA Emirhan N, Albayrak A, Çamurcu İY, Üçpunar H, Yapıcı F, Çöbden A. 65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. Haziran 2020;10(2):177-183.
Chicago Emirhan, Necati, Akif Albayrak, İsmet Yalkın Çamurcu, Hanifi Üçpunar, Furkan Yapıcı, ve Adem Çöbden. “65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty”. Bozok Tıp Dergisi 10, sy. 2 (Haziran 2020): 177-83.
EndNote Emirhan N, Albayrak A, Çamurcu İY, Üçpunar H, Yapıcı F, Çöbden A (01 Haziran 2020) 65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty. Bozok Tıp Dergisi 10 2 177–183.
IEEE N. Emirhan, A. Albayrak, İ. Y. Çamurcu, H. Üçpunar, F. Yapıcı, ve A. Çöbden, “65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty”, Bozok Tıp Dergisi, c. 10, sy. 2, ss. 177–183, 2020.
ISNAD Emirhan, Necati vd. “65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty”. Bozok Tıp Dergisi 10/2 (Haziran 2020), 177-183.
JAMA Emirhan N, Albayrak A, Çamurcu İY, Üçpunar H, Yapıcı F, Çöbden A. 65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. 2020;10:177–183.
MLA Emirhan, Necati vd. “65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty”. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, c. 10, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 177-83.
Vancouver Emirhan N, Albayrak A, Çamurcu İY, Üçpunar H, Yapıcı F, Çöbden A. 65 YAŞ ÜSTÜ HASTALARDA FEMUR BOYUN KIRIĞI TEDAVİSİNDE SEMENTLİ VE SEMENTSİZ HEMİARTROPLASTİ SONRASI MORTALİTENİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Comparison of Mortality After Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged Over 65 Years Old Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. 2020;10(2):177-83.
Copyright © BOZOK Üniversitesi - Tıp Fakültesi