Modeling of Some Egg Characteristics in Henna Partridges

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 6, 729 - 742, 15.11.2024

Tolga Tolun , İsmail Gök , Mustafa Şahin

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1555738

Abstract

In this study, the distributions of egg count (daily and cumulative), width, length and weight values of chukar partridges obtained in two different egg production seasons were statistically modeled. For this purpose, in modeling cumulative egg production curves; Logistic, Gompertz, Gamma, Schunute, Brody, Richard, Negative Exponential, Von Bertalanffy, Cubic Piecewise and Cubic models were used, and in evaluating daily egg production curves; Gompertz, Logistic, Richard, McNally, Gamma, Cubic Piecewise, Quadratic, Quadratic Piecewise and Modified Compartmental models were used. In modeling egg width values; Gompertz, Gamma, Cubic Piecewise and Cubic models were used, in modeling length values; Logistic, Gamma, Cubic Piecewise and Cubic models were used, and in modeling weight values; McNally, Gamma, Cubic Piecewise and Cubic models were used. In all modeling studies, as comparison and evaluation criteria; Error Mean Square, Corrected Coefficient of Determination, Accuracy Factor, Bias Factor, Durbin-Watson, Akaike Information Criterion, Corrected Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion were taken into consideration. As a result of the study; Gamma was determined as the most suitable model for modeling cumulative egg yields and length values, McNally for modeling daily egg yields and weight values, and Gompertz and Gamma models for modeling egg width values.

Keywords

Alectoris chukar, Egg production, Modeling, Curve

Supporting Institution

Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri (BAP) Yönetim Birimi Başkanlığı

Project Number

2021/7-9 D

References

• Ahmadu A, Kabir M, Iyiola-Tunji AO, Akinsola OM, Igbadan H. 2017. Mathematical modelling of egg production curves of shikabrown parents. Nigerian Soc Anim Prod, 44(1): 61-75.
• Balcioglu MS, Kizilkaya K, Karabag K, Alkan S, Yolcu HI, Sahin E. 2009. Comparison of Growth characteristics of chukar partridges (Alectoris chukar) raised in captivity. J Appl Anim Res, 35(1): 21-24.
• Cason JA, Britton WM. 1988. Comparison of compartmental and Adams-Bell models of poultry egg production. Poultry Sci, 67: 213-218.
• Çetin O, Kırıkçı K, Gülşen N. 1997. Farklı bakım şartlarında kınalı kekliklerin (A. chukar) bazı verim özellikleri. Vet Bil Derg, 13(2): 5-10.
• Çetin O, Kırıkçı K, Günlü A, Tepeli C. 2002. Kaya kekliklerinin (A. graeca) 2. yaş verim performansları. Vet Bil Derg, 18(1-2): 69-71.
• Congleton Jr WR, Chamberlain JT, Muir FV, Hawes RO. 1981. Limitations of using the incomplete Gamma function to generate egg production curves. Poultry Sci, 60(3): 689-691.
• Eleroğlu H, Bircan H, Yıldırım A, Kılıç F. 2016. Ticari etlik piliçlerde büyüme eğrilerinin doğrusal olmayan modeller kullanılarak karşılaştırılması. Tavukçuluk Araş Derg, 13(2): 12-16.
• Ersoz F, Alpan O. 1994. Evaluation of the growth curve by the method of iterated least square. Lalahan Hayv Araş Enst Derg, 34(3-4): 74-83.
• İzgi V, Akkol S, Tekeli A. 2020. Genel doğrusal ve çok seviyeli doğrusal büyüme modelleri kullanılarak etlik piliçlerde büyümenin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Tar Araş Derg, 7(2): 163-171.
• Kantarlı M. 2018. Ülkemizdeki kınalı keklik popülasyonlarının biyolojik ve ekolojik değerlendirilmesi. Doğanın Sesi, (1):11-28.
• Kaplan, S, Narinç D, Gürcan EK. 2015. Genetic parameter estimates of growth curve and reproduction traits in Japanese quail. Poultry Sci, 93(1): 24-30.
• Karadavut U, Taskin A, Dogan E, Ergun D. 2022. Comparing the effects of environmental enrichment on growth in geese with some models. Türk Tar Doğa Bil Derg, 9(1): 41-47.
• Kiziroğlu İ. 1983. Türkiye kuşları. T.O.K.B. Tabii Hayatı Koruma Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları., Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 43-65.
• McMillan I, Gowe RS, Gavora JS, Fairfull AR. 1986. Prediction of annual production from part record egg production in chickens by three mathematical models. Poultry Sci, 65(5): 817-822.
• Narinç D, Aksoy T, İlaslan Çürek D, Karaman D. 2007. Farklı gelişme hızına sahip etlik piliçlerde büyümenin analizi. Hayv Araş Derg, 17(2): 1-8.
• Narinç D, Aksoy T, Karaman E, Karabağ K. 2009. Japon Bıldırcınlarında yüksek canlı ağırlık yönünde uygulanan seleksiyonun büyüme parametreleri üzerine etkisi. Akdeniz Univ J Fac Agri, 22(2): 149-156.
• Narinc D, Aksoy T. 2014. Effects of multi-trait selection on phenotypic and genetic changes in a meat type dam line of Japanese quail. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 20(2): 231-238.
• Narinc D, Karaman E, Aksoy T, Firat MZ. 2013. Investigation of nonlinear models to describe longterm egg production in Japanese quail. Poultry Sci, 92(6): 1676-1682.
• Pis T. 2012. Growth and development of chicks of two species of partridge: the grey partridge (Perdix perdix) and the chukar (Alectoris chukar). British Poultry Sci, 53(1): 141-144.
• Tolun T, Yavuz E, Sahin M, Gok I. 2023. Modeling egg curves in partridges. BSJ Agri, 6(1): 21-25.
• Türker İ, Narinç D, Alkan S. 2017. Yerli ve yabancı yumurtacı hibrit sürülerde yumurta ağırlığının zamana bağlı değişiminin karşılaştırılması ve modellenmesi. Akad Zir Derg, 6(2): 169-176.
• Wen Y, Liu K, Liu H, Cao H, Mao H, Dong X, Yin Z. 2019. Comparison of nine growth curve models to describe growth of partridges (Alectoris chukar). J Appl Anim Res, 47: 195-200.
• Yalçınöz E, Şahin M. 2020. Yumurtacı tavuklarda yumurta verim eğrilerinin modellenmesi. KSÜ Tar Doğa Derg, 23(5): 1373-1378.
• Yavuz E, Abacı SH, Erensoy K, Şahin M. 2023. Modeling of individual egg weights of Lohmann-Brown layer hens. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci, 47(3): 229-335.