Teknoloji ve Yenilik Yönetiminde Sosyal Sorumluluk

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 20 - 29, 01.06.2014

Ayşe Gökçen Murat Koç , Mustafa Fedai Çavuş

Öz

Bu çalışma, literatür taraması ve teori temelli kaynaklara dayanarak teknoloji ve yenilik yönetimi ile sosyal sorumluluk arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmayı hedeflemektedir. Günümüzde, işletmelerin ortaya çıkışı teknoloji ve uygulamaları ile direkt olarak şekillenmekte ve yönlendirilmektedir. Günümüzün sürekli değişen iş dünyasında, değişiklik yapmak riskli bir süreçtir ve yenilik, kuruluşların rekabet edebilmeleri için itici bir güçtür. Sosyal (açıdan) sorumlu olabilmek ve rekabet avantajı elde etmek için, işletmelerin değişime açık ve teknolojiyi yönetebiliyor olmaları gerekir. Referansların büyük bir bölümü yenilik, teknoloji ve bunların yönetimi, sosyal ve kurumsal sorumluluk (CSR) ile bunların yararlarıyla ilgili konuları ele alan literatür olmuştur

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yenilik, Teknoloji, Sosyal Sorumluluk, Kurumsal Sosyal

Being Socially Responsible by Managing Technology and Innovation

Öz

Based on the literature review and the theory based view of the resources, this study aims to research the relationship between social responsibility and management of technology and innovation. Today, the origins of businesses are shaped and directed by technology and its practices. In today's ever-changing business world, making a change is a risky process and the innovation is a driving force for the organizations to be able to compete. In order to be socially responsible and get a competitive advantage, businesses should correspond to the change and be able to manage technology. The greatest source of references was the management literature which followed by the topics of innovation, technology and their management, social and corporate responsibility (CSR) with their benefits

Anahtar Kelimeler

Innovation, Technology, Social Responsibility, and Corporate Social

Kaynakça

• Alley, A. (1996). The Evolution of CSR. Corporate Watch, Corporate Critical http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=2682 Retrieved from:
• Badawy, M. K. (1998). Technology Management Education: Alternative models.California Management Review. 40(4), 94–115.
• Barker, A. (2001). The Alchemy of Innovation. Industrial Society Publisher. Translater: Ahmet Kardam. MESS Türkiye Metal Sendikası, BZD Yayın, Istanbul.
• Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46-53.
• Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper and Borthers, NY
• Business Wire. (2006). Starbucks annual meeting of shareholders starts over a cup of coffee: Company’s impact now extends well beyond stores’ four http://investor.starbucks.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=99518&p=irolnewsArt icle_Print&ID=814454 & highlight. Retrieved from
• Cochran, P. L. (2007). The Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility. Kelly School of Business, Business Horizons, 50, 449-454.
• Crowther, D., Guler, A. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility. Ventus Publishing ApS, ISBN 978-87-7681-415-1.
• Davis, K. (1973). The Case For and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-323.
• Demirci, E. (2007). Stratejik Girişimciliğin Firma Yenilikçiliğine Etkisi. (Master Thesis). Gebze Advanced Technology Institute. Gebze.
• Durna, U. (2002). Yenilik Yönetimi. Nobel Yayin Dağıtım, 1.Baskı, Ankara.
• Elster, J. (1983). Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman- soc-resp-business.html. Times Magazine. Retrieved from:
• Gokcek, O. (2007). Yenilik Yönetimi Süreci ve Yenilik Stratejileri: Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Alan Çalışması. (Master Thesis). Istanbul University. Istanbul.
• Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 0022-2380.
• McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603-609.
• Murray, S.(2007). Bottom-line Benefits Special Award Corporate Responsibility: Ethical concerns are a growing factor in staff motivation. Financial Times.
• Nogareda,J.,S., Ziegler, A. (2006). Green Management and Green Technology: Exploring the Casual Relationship. Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS). Zurich, Switzerland.
• Porter, M.E., Kramer, M. R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harward Business Review, 80(12), 56-68.
• Runde, D.F.(2011). The Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility: Cooperation between the Private Sector and The U.S. Government. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved from http://csis.org/publication/evolution-corporate-social-responsibility.
• Sprinkle, G.B., Maines, L. A. (2010). The Benefits and Costs of Corporate Social Responsibility. Kelly School of Business, Business Horizons, 53, 445-453.
• Verburg, R. M., Ortt, J. R., & Dicke, W. M. (2006). Managing Technology and Innovation: An introduction. Routledge, New York.
• Werther,W.B.,Chandler,D. (2005). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility as Global Brand Insurance. Kelly School of Business, Business Horizons, 48, 317-324.
• White, M. A., Bruton, G. D. (2011). The Management of Technology and Innovation: A strategic approach. South-Western Cengage Learning, 2nd Ed., United States.