Explicit Intertextual Connections in Driscoll’s Her Perfect Family: A Reader-Centric Analysis

Abstract

This study examines explicit intertextuality and its impact on the reader in Teresa Driscoll’s crime novel, Her Perfect Family, published in late 2021. Julia Kristeva’s theory of intertextuality stands as a significant milestone in postmodernist literature, positing that any new text is inevitably influenced or enriched by prior writings. British author Driscoll employs explicit intertextuality throughout the work, incorporating references to renowned English writers such as George Eliot, Thomas Hardy, Charles Dickens, Charlotte Brontë, D.H. Lawrence, Mary Shelley, and Lewis Carroll in various chapters. As a result, the reader perceives a connection between these authors and the chapters, contributing to the overall reading experience. It becomes evident that Driscoll, as a contemporary postmodernist novelist, draws from the themes and characters of these established literary figures to enhance the intricacies of her plot. By providing clues and insights relevant to the contemporary context, the author cleverly weaves explicit intertextual references into the narrative, engaging readers in a process akin to solving a puzzle, and creating connections. Moreover, Driscoll assumes the role of an instructor, posing critical questions about the aforementioned acclaimed authors, their works, and their characters. This approach makes the reader feel like a student, encouraging them to establish intertextual connections in Her Perfect Family and to understand the plot more easily.

Keywords

• Her Perfect Family
• intertextuality
• Julia Kristeva
• postmodernism
• Teresa Driscoll

References

1. Akdal, D. & Şahin, A. (2014). The effects of intertextual reading approach on the development of creative writing skills, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 54, 171-186.
2. Albright, J. (2018). Postmodernism. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (pp. 1-5). Blackwell Publishing.
3. Ariel, Y., & Avidar, R. (2015). Information, interactivity, and social media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 19-30.
4. Bell, M. (1992). D. H. Lawrence: Language and being. Cambridge University.
5. Bentz, N., Chase, E., & DeLoach, P. (2021). Social media debate position 4: Social media and information services. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 25(1-2), 55-64.
6. Bishop, R. (1996). Postmodernism. In D. Levinson and M. Ember (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology. Henry Holt and Company.
7. Brontë, C. (2006). Jane Eyre. Penguin Classics.
8. Browning, G. (2014). Lyotard, Jean-François (1924–98). In M. Gibbons (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (pp.1-2). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

9. Butler, C. (2002). Postmodernism: A very short introduction. Oxford University.
10. Brennan, Z. (2010). Brontë’s Jane Eyre. Continuum.
11. Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46-65.
12. Carroll, L. (2010). Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Collins Classics.
13. Chua, Y.T. & Holt, T.J. (2016). A cross-national examination of the techniques of neutralization to account for hacking behaviors. Victims & Offenders, 11(4), 534-555.
14. Clemit, P. (2003). Frankenstein, Matilda, and the legacies of Godwin and Wollstonecraft. In E. Schor (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley (pp.26-44). Cambridge University.
15. Davies, A. (2013). New D. H. Lawrence. Textual Practice, 27(2), 343-345.
16. Davis, P. (2007). Critical Companion to Charles Dickens: A literary reference to his life and work. Facts On File.
17. Dhiman, D. B. (2023). Key Issues and New Challenges in New Media Technology in 2023: A Critical Review. Journal of Media & Management, 5(1), 1-4.
18. Dickens, C. (2004). A Tale of Two Cities. Barnes & Noble Books.
19. Dickinson, D. (2016). Yet Alive? Methodists in British Fiction since 1890. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
20. Driscoll, T. (2021). Her Perfect Family. Thomas & Mercer. Kindle Edition. ASIN: ‎ B08N5YFL78.
21. Eliot, G. (2003). The Mill on the Floss. Penguin Books.
22. Fırat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 239–267.
23. Griffiths, M. D., & Kuss, D. (2017). Adolescent social media addiction (revisited). Education and Health, 35(3), 49-52.
24. Gündar, Z. (2022). H.D.’s Trilogy: The poetess leaning from mythic margin to the centre. Turkish Studies – Language and Literature, 17(3), 869-888.
25. Güney, K. (2023). Considering the Advantages and Disadvantages of Utilizing Social Media to Enhance Learning and Engagement in K-12 Education. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(2), 83-100.
26. Hartman, D. K. (1992). Intertextuality and reading: The text, the reader, the author, and the context. Linguistics and Education, 4(3-4), 295–311.
27. Hawes, D. (2007). Charles Dickens. Continuum.
28. Heise, U. K. (2004). Science, Technology, and Postmodernism. In S. Connor (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism (pp.136-167). Cambridge University.
29. Hoeveler, D. (2003). Frankenstein, Feminism, and Literary Theory. In Esther Schor (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley (pp.45-62). Cambridge University.
30. Jameson, F. (1984). Foreword. In Jean-Francois Lyotard’s The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (pp.vii-xxi). University of Minnesota.
31. Juvan, M. (2008). History and poetics of intertextuality. Purdue University
32. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
33. Karlsen, R., & Aalberg, T. (2023). Social media and trust in news: An experimental study of the effect of Facebook on news story credibility. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 144-160.
34. Kester, K. (2018). Postmodernism in Post-truth Times. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(14), 1330–1331.
35. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (Ed. L. S. Roudiez). Columbia University.
36. Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva Reader (Ed. T. Moi). Columbia University.
37. Kuznar, L. A. (1997). Reclaiming a Scientific Anthropology. Rowman Altamira.
38. Lawrence, D.H. (1995). The Rainbow. Wordsworth Classics.
39. Lika, F. (2018). Roidis and the Borrowed Muse: British Historiography, Fiction and Satire in Pope Joan. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
40. Lombardi, A. (2021). More is more: Explicit intertextuality in university writing placement exam essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, 1-12.
41. Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota.
42. Marrapodi, M. (2017). Shakespeare and the Visual Arts: The Italian Influence. Taylor & Francis.
43. Mellor, A. K. (2003). Making a “monster”: An Introduction to Frankenstein. In E. Schor (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley (pp.9-25). Cambridge University.
44. Morris, S. (2016, February 19). Bones found at prison may belong to real-life Tess of the d’Urbervilles. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/feb/19/ thomas-hardy-tess-of-the-durbervilles-bones-found-at-prison
45. Orr, M. (2010). Intertextuality. In M. Ryan (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Literary and Cultural Theory (pp.1-4). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
46. Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 4-29.
47. Powell. J. (1998). Postmodernism for Beginners. Writers & Readers Publishing.
48. Rignall, J. (2000). Oxford Reader’s Companion to George Eliot. Oxford University.
49. Shandler, R., & Gomez, M. A. (2022). The hidden threat of cyberattacks – undermining public confidence in government. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 1-16.
50. Sheehan, P. (2004). Postmodernism and philosophy. In S. Connor (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism (pp.20-42). Cambridge University.
51. Shelley, M. (2003). Frankenstein. Penguin Classics.
52. Shi, F. D. (2016). Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland as an anti-feminist text: Historical, psychoanalytical and postcolonial perspectives. Women: A Cultural Review, 27(2), 177-201.
53. Tarescavage, A. M. (2020). Science Wars II: The insidious influence of postmodern ideology on clinical psychology (commentary on “Implications of ideological bias in social psychology on clinical practice”). Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 27(2), 1-4.
54. Tejera, C. B. (2023). Mechanisms to detect and translate audiovisual intertextuality in the dubbing of animated productions into Spanish. The Translator, 1-17.
55. Vaishnav, B. (2021). Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein- Inspiration and Continuity of the Depiction of the Conflict between Science and Religion in Contemporary Women’s Writing. Research Horizons, 11, 79-83.
56. Watts, C. (2007). Thomas Hardy: “Tess of the D’Urbervilles.”. Humanities-Ebooks.