“Austen’da Kaybolan,” Regency’de Bulunan

Abstract

Jane Austen’ın yazıları ve Naiplik (Regency) döneminin tarihsel bağlamının büyüsü o kadar çekicidir ki 21. yüzyılda bile Austen metinleri ve içerikleri uyarlamalar yoluyla üretilmeye devam etmektedir. Austen-vari Naipliğin yeniden ziyaret edilmesi olarak işlev gören bu uyarlamalar, bizim bakışlarımızla görsel bir gezintiye çıktığımız ve nostaljik duygularla özlediğimiz Austen dönemini görsel alanlar olarak sunmaktadırlar. Zamanının keskin bir gözlemcisi ve sosyal eleştirmeni olan Austen, kültürel mirasta öyle bir yere sahiptir ki, eserleri Endüstri Devrimi sonrasında kaybedilmiş olan mükemmellik ve masumluk gibi özlenen eğilimlerin hatırlatıldığı araçlar olmuş olan İngilizliğin sembolü haline gelen bir yazar olmuştur. Bu uyarlamalarda, romans türünün de yansıması ile Austen-vari Naiplik döneminin uzak alanı, geçmiş ve şimdinin kendiliğinden aynı anda var olduğu bir “heterotopya” haline gelmiştir. Bu makalede, Dan Zeff’in yönettiği, Austen’da Kaybolan (Lost in Austen) (2008), adlı ITV mini serisini Naiplik ve güncel dönemi öyle bir yöntemle kıyasladığını, ki böylece daha sonra gelen 21. yüzyıl uyarlamalarının postmodern bir nostaljik his uyandıran neo-Austenvari aşamasına evrilmesine yol açan güncel dönem uyarlama örneklerinden olduğunu öne sürmekteyim.

Keywords

• Adaptasyon
• Lost in Austen
• neo-Austenian
• heterotopya
• Naiplik

“Lost in Austen,” Found in Regency

Abstract

The charm of Jane Austen’s writing and the historical context of the Regency era are so appealing that even in the 21st century, Austen texts and contents have continued to be produced through adaptations. These adaptations that function as re-visitings of the Austenian Regency have presented visual realms where we voyeuristically gaze and miss the Austenian past with nostalgic feelings. Austen, as a keen observer and social critic of her time, occupies such a place at the heart of the cultural heritage that she has become the symbol of Englishness whose works are the tools to remind longed notions of perfection and innocence lost after the Industrial Revolution. With the reflection of the romance plot, in these adaptations, the remote space of the Austenian Regency has become a “heterotopia” where past and present coexist simultaneously. In this article, I assert that the ITV mini-series Lost in Austen (2008), directed by Dan Zeff as an example of current adaptations, compares the Regency and the contemporary in such a way that it leads the forthcoming 21st-century adaptations to evolve into neo-Austenian phase that evokes a postmodern sense of nostalgia.

Keywords

• adaptation
• Lost in Austen
• neo-Austenian
• heterotopia
• Regency

Supporting Institution

This study has been supported with a postdoctoral grant by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBİTAK).

References

1. Barber, N. (2015, September 22). Pride and Prejudice at 20: The scene that changed everything. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20150922-pride-and-prejudice-at-20-the-scene-that-changed-everything
2. Beer, G. (1970). The romance. Routledge.
3. Benedict, B. (2000). Sensibility by the numbers: Austen’s work as Regency popular fiction. In D. Lynch (Ed.), Janeites: Austen’s Disciples and Devotees (pp. 63-86). Princeton University Press.
4. Boym, S. (2001). The future of nostalgia. Basic Books.
5. Bowles, K. (2003). Commodifying Austen: The Janeite culture of the internet and commercialisation through product and television series spinoffs. In G. Macdonald and A. Macdonald (Eds.) Jane Austen on screen (pp. 15-21). Cambridge University Press.
6. Cardwell, S. (2002). Adaptation revisited: television and the classic novel. Manchester University Press.
7. Crusie, J. (1998, March). Let us now praise scribbling women. Inside Borders. https://jennycrusie.com/non-fiction/let-us-now-praise-scribbling-women/
8. Dow, G. and Hanson, C. (2012). Uses of Austen: Jane’s afterlives. Palgrave Macmillan.

9. Elam, D. (1992). Romancing the postmodern. Routledge.
10. Fletcher, L. (2016). Historical romance fiction: Heterosexuality and performativity. Routledge.
11. Foucault, M. and Miskowiec, J. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics. The John Hopkins University Press 16 (1), 22-27.
12. Fuchs, B. (2004). Romance. Routledge.
13. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Polity Press.
14. Higson, A. (2003). English heritage, English cinema: Costume drama since 1980. Oxford University Press.
15. Higson, A. (2004). English heritage, English literature, English cinema: Selling Jane Austen to movie audiences in the 1990s. In E. Voigts-Virchow (Ed.), Janespotting and beyond: British Heritage Retrovisions since the Mid-1990s (pp. 35-50). Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen.
16. Higson, A. (2014). Nostalgia is not what it used to be: heritage films, nostalgia websites and contemporary consumers. Consumption Markets & Culture, 17(2), 120-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2013.776305
17. Jameson, F. (Autumn, 1975). Magical narratives: Romance as genre. New Literary History, 7(1), 135-163. Critical Challenges: The Bellagio Symposium.
18. Johnson, B. (2019). Sir Walter Scott on Jane Austen. [From The Quarterly Review, October, 1815] Emma; a Novel. By the author of Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, etc. 3 vols. 12mo. Famous Reviews, Good Press, 274-289.
19. Johnson, C. L. (2000). The divine miss Jane: Jane Austen, Janeites, and the discipline of novel studies. In D. Lynch (Ed.), Janeites: Austen’s disciples and devotees (pp. 25-44). Princeton University Press.
20. Jones, V. (2015). Jane Austen’s domestic realism. In Peter Garside and Karen O’Brien (Eds.), The Oxford history of the novel in English: English and British fiction 1750-1820 (Vol.2, pp. 273-295). Oxford University Press.
21. Kaplan, L. (Spring 2010). Lost in Austen and generation-Y Janeites. Persuasions: The Jane Austen journal on-line. JASNA, 30(2).
22. Konigsberg, I. (1985). Narrative technique in the English novel: Defoe to Austen. Archon Books.
23. Krentz, J. A. (1992). Dangerous men& adventurous women: Romance writers on the appeal of the romance. University of Pennsylvania Press.
24. Lacan, J. (1973). The line and the light. The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis.
25. Larsson, L. (1994). Lace and the limits of reading. Nordic Cultural Studies, E. Vainikkala and K. Eskola (Eds.). 8(2), 273-287.
26. Lynch, D. (2000). Introduction. In D. Lynch (Ed.), Janeites: Austen’s disciples and devotees (pp. 3-24). Princeton University Press.
27. Macdonald, G. and Macdonald A. (2003). Introduction. In Macdonald, G. and Macdonald A. (Eds.), Jane Austen on screen (pp.1-8). Cambridge University Press.
28. Margolis, H. (2003). Janeite culture: what does the name “Jane Austen” authorize? In Macdonald, G. and Macdonald A. (Eds.), Jane Austen on screen (pp. 22-43). Cambridge University Press.
29. Modleski, T. (1982). Loving with a vengeance: Mass produced fantasies for women. Archon Book.
30. Montrose, L. (1992). New historicisms. In S. Greenblatt and G. Gunn (Eds.), Redrawing the boundaries (pp. 392-418). The Modern Language Association of America.
31. North, J. (1999). Conservative Austen, radical Austen: Sense and Sensibility from text to screen. In D. Cartmell and I. Whelehan (Eds.), Adaptations: From text to screen, screen to text (pp. 38-50). Routledge.
32. Pearce, L. (2007). Romance writing. Polity Press.
33. Preston, G. (2003). Short “takes” on Austen: Summarizing the controversy between literary purists and film enthusiasts. Jane Austen On Screen. In Macdonald, G. and Macdonald A. (Eds.), Jane Austen on screen (pp. 9-21). Cambridge University Press.
34. Richardson, J. (1973). The Regency.
35. Ridout, A. (2010). Lost in Austen: Adaptation and the feminist politics of nostalgia. Adaptation. 4(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apq008
36. Ross, D. L. (1991). Jane Austen’s novels: the romantic denouement. In D. L. Ross (Ed.), The excellence of falsehood: Romance, realism, and women’s contribution to the novel (pp.166-207). The University Press of Kentucky.
37. Sales, R. (1996). Jane Austen and the representation of the Regency period. Taylor& Francis.
38. Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and appropriation. Routledge.
39. Soble, A. (1990). The structure of love. Yale University Press.
40. Sonnet, E. (1999). From Emma to Clueless: Taste, pleasure and the scene of history. In D. Cartmell and I. Whelehan (Eds.), Adaptations: From text to screen, screen to text (pp.51-62). Routledge.
41. Starke, R. (2009). Lost in Austen. Transnational Literature. 1(2). http://fhrc.flinders.edu.au/transnational/home.html
42. Tigges, W. (Winter 2018). Lost in Austen: A postmodern reanimation of Pride and Prejudice. JASNA: Persuasions. 39(1).
43. Wagner, G. (1975). The novel and the cinema. Associated University Press.
44. Wiltshire, J. (2001). Recreating Jane Austen. Cambridge University Press.