Shifting Ideological Conceptions of Gender and the Challenge of Characterisation in Nigerian Drama

Abstract

Drama has, over the years, portrayed issues of gender inequality and agitations, from Aristophanes’ Lysistrata, J. P. Clark’s The Wives Revolt, Ola Rotimi’s Our Husband Has Gone Mad Again, Fred Agbeyegbe’s The King Must Dance Naked, Tracie Uto’s Our Wives Have Gone Mad Again, Irene Salami-Aguloye’s Sweet Revenge, More Than Dancing to Ama Ata Aidoo’s Anowa by the Ghanaian writer. The list of plays x-raying gender and feminist issues is endless. Drama has thus portrayed gender issues in its complexities, limiting itself majorly to the male-female binary in gender discusses. Using the psychoanalytical theory, Feminism, Genderism and Postgenderism as critical paradigms, the paper interrogates contemporary Nigerian drama portrayal of discriminatory gender practices arising from the social-cultural construct of the dichotomy between the genders. It uses Ben Binebai's monodrama, Karena’s Cross, as the primary text in a paradigmatic study of gender, male-female relationships, perceptions, presentations and portrayals of social roles in drama. The study identifies that over the years, drama has portrayed the female gender in stereotypical ways and presented socially constructed images of male-female relationship that reinforces the victim status of the female gender. The paper also identifies that Nigerian society is no more as traditional as it used to be. There is presently a transition from stereotypical gender understanding to an acceptance of western concepts of gender and gender roles. The paper concludes that Nigeria, and Africa, is presently experiencing a reversal of thought and perception of gender roles. The paper identifies that there is a nostalgic reliance on a past and fading culture in contemporary Nigerian drama presentation of gender issues, which reinforces archetypally held notions of gender.

Keywords

• Feminism Theory
• Dramatic Criticism
• Gender Studies
• Postgenderism
• Genderism
• Karena’s Cross

Nijerya Dramasında Cinsiyete İlişkin Değişen İdeolojik Kavramlar ve Karakter

Abstract

Drama has, over the years, portrayed issues of gender inequality and agitations, from Aristophanes’ Lysistrata, J. P. Clark’s The Wives Revolt, Ola Rotimi’s Our Husband Has Gone Mad Again, Fred Agbeyegbe’s The King Must Dance Naked, Tracie Uto’s Our Wives Have Gone Mad Again, Irene Salami-Aguloye’s Sweet Revenge, More Than Dancing to Ama Ata Aidoo’s Anowa by the Ghanaian writer. The list of plays x-raying gender and feminist issues is endless. Drama has thus portrayed gender issues in its complexities, limiting itself majorly to the male-female binary in gender discusses. Using the psychoanalytical theory, Feminism, Genderism and Postgenderism as critical paradigms, the paper interrogates contemporary Nigerian drama portrayal of discriminatory gender practices arising from the social-cultural construct of the dichotomy between the genders. It uses Ben Binebai's monodrama, Karena’s Cross, as the primary text in a paradigmatic study of gender, male-female relationships, perceptions, presentations and portrayals of social roles in drama. The study identifies that over the years, drama has portrayed the female gender in stereotypical ways and presented socially constructed images of male-female relationship that reinforces the victim status of the female gender. The paper also identifies that Nigerian society is no more as traditional as it used to be. There is presently a transition from stereotypical gender understanding to an acceptance of western concepts of gender and gender roles. The paper concludes that Nigeria, and Africa, is presently experiencing a reversal of thought and perception of gender roles. The paper identifies that there is a nostalgic reliance on a past and fading culture in contemporary Nigerian drama presentation of gender issues, which reinforces archetypally held notions of gender.

Keywords

• Karena's Cross
• Feminism theory
• dramatic criticism
• gender studies
• postgenderism
• genderism

References

1. Boxer, M. J. (2003). When Women Ask the Questions: Creating Women’s Studies in America. Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Chinweizu. (1990). The Anatomy of Female Power: A Masculinist Dissection of Matriarchy. Pero Press. De Beauvoir, S. (2011). The Second Sex. Vintage Books.
3. Dvorsky, G. and Hughes, J. (2008). Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary. Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies.
4. Eni, K. E. (2018). Narrating Self: Interrogating Gender Characterization in Akpos Adesi’s Whose Daughter Am I? In Greg Mbajiorgu and Amanze Akpuda (Eds.) 50 Years of Solo Performing Art in Nigerian Theatre 1966-2016. Kraft Books.
5. Fine, R. (2014). Freud: A Critical Re-Evaluation. Routledge.
6. Freud, S. (1993). On Dreams. Excerpts. Art in Theory 1900-1990. Ed. Charles Harrison and Paul Wood. Blackwell Pub., Inc. 26-34.
7. Geary, C. David. (2006). Male, Female: The Evolution of Sex Differences. American Psychological Association.
8. Joan, S. (1988). Gender and the Politics of History. Columbia University Press.

9. Joan, S. (1997). Women’s Studies on the Edge: Introduction, Differences. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 9(3): i–v.
10. Julia, W. (1997). Gendered Media: The Influence of Media on Views of Gender. Mass Media Annual. McGraw-Hill.
11. Kolawole, G. and Sule, E. E. (2020). The Unbeatable Strides of Our Women in the Distant Past and in the Recent Times: A Preface. In Kolawole, Gboyega and Sule E. Egya (Eds.) A Graceful Woman of Great Discerning: A Festschrift in Honour of Professor Mabel Evwierhoma. University of Abuja Press. pp. i-xiii.
12. Nwabueze, E. (2016). Africa’s Female Playwrights: A Critical Profile in Emeka Nwabueze (Ed.) African Female Playwrights: A Study of Matter and Manner. ABIC. pp. 10-39.
13. Ridley, M. (2003). The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. Harper Perennial.
14. Skeggs, B. (1995). Women’s Studies in Britain: Entitlement Cultures and Institutional Constraints. Women’s Studies International Forum, 18(4), 475-485.