Black Sisterhood and Intersectionality in Gloria Naylor’s The Women of Brewster Place

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 331 - 348, 29.12.2025

Hüseyin Altındiş

https://doi.org/10.47777/cankujhss.1672451

Öz

Using intersectionality as a critical framework and praxis, this paper aims to analyze how multiple systems of oppression—what Patricia Hill Collins calls the “matrix of domination”—including racism, sexism, classism, and homophobia—shape the lived experiences of seven Black women characters within the urban landscape of Brewster Place in Gloria Naylor’s novel, The Women of Brewster Place (1982). This study illuminates how Naylor’s characters navigate the complex matrix of domination that controls, dominates, and shapes their lives. Though there are seven Black women in the novel, the analysis pays particular attention to Kiswana Browne and The Two (Theresa and Lorraine) and discusses how the characters’ intersecting identities influence their access to resources, their relationships with one another, and their strategies of resistance. Drawing on intersectional frameworks developed by Patricia Hill Collins (2019), Vivian M. May (2015), and Sırma Bilge (2013), this paper demonstrates how Naylor’s narrative foresees key concepts in intersectional theory, including Collins’ concepts of the simultaneity of oppression, the importance of standpoint epistemology, and the role of collective resistance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intersectionality , black feminism , injustice , race , epistemology , praxis

Teşekkür

This article is a revised version of the paper presented at the 17th International IDEA Conference on 7-8-9 May 2025, at Fırat University, Elazığ, Türkiye.

Gloria Naylor’un The Women of Brewster Place Romanında Siyahi Kız Kardeşlik ve Kesişimsellik

Öz

Kesişimselliği eleştirel bir çerçeve ve uygulama alanı olarak kullanan bu makale, Patricia Hill Collins’in “tahakküm matriksi” olarak adlandırdığı—ırkçılık, cinsiyetçilik, sınıfçılık ve homofobiyi içeren—çoklu baskı sistemlerinin, Gloria Naylor’ın The Women of Brewster Place adlı romanındaki Brewster Place apartmanında yaşayan yedi Siyahi kadın karakterin deneyimlerini nasıl şekillendirdiğini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, Naylor’ın karakterlerinin hayatlarını kontrol eden, yöneten ve şekillendiren karmaşık tahakküm matriksinde direnme ve meydan okuma yoluyla yönlerini nasıl bulduklarını açıklamaktadır. Romanda yedi siyahi kadın olmasına rağmen, analiz özellikle Kiswana Browne ve İkili’ye (Theresa ve Lorraine) odaklanır ve karakterlerin kesişen kimliklerinin kaynaklara erişimlerini, birbirleriyle ilişkilerini ve direniş stratejilerini nasıl etkilediğini tartışmaktadır. Patricia Hill Collins (2019), Vivian M. May (2015) ve Sirma Bilge’nin (2013) geliştirmiş oldukları Kesişimsellik kuramından yola çıkarak, bu çalışma, Naylor’ın anlatısının kesişimsel teorideki baskının eşzamanlılığı, duruş epistemolojisinin önemi ve kolektif direnişin rolü gibi temel kavramları nasıl öngördüğünü göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kesişimsellik , siyah feminism , adaletsizlik , ırk , epistemoloji , praksis

Teşekkür

This article is a revised version of the paper presented at the 17th International IDEA Conference on 7-8-9 May 2025, at Fırat University, Elazığ, Türkiye.

Kaynakça

• Altunsoy, Ş. (2024). “I long to stride behind my lord”: The yearning voice in Vittoria Colonna’s sonnets. Udekad, 7 (4), 1005-1017. https://doi.org/10.37999/udekad.1565476
• Beal, F. (1969). Double jeopardy: To be Black and female. In Beverly Guy-Sheftall (Ed.) Words of Fire: An Anthology of African American Feminist Thought (pp. 146–155). New Press.
• Brewer, R. M. (1993). Theorizing Race, Class, and Gender: The New Scholarship of Black Feminist Intellectuals and Black Women’s Labor. In Stanley James and Abena P.A. Busia (Eds), Theorizing Black Feminisms: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women (pp.13–31). Routledge.
• Butler, J. (2010). Frames of War: When is life Grievable? Verso.
• Carastathis, A. (2016). Intersectionality: Origins, Contestations, Horizons. University of Nebraska Press.
• Carbado, D. W. (2013). Colorblind Intersectionality. Signs, 38 (4), Intersectionality: Theorizing Power, Empowering Theory, 811-845 Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2291680
• Christian, B. (1990). Gloria Naylor’s geography: Community, class, and patriarchy in The Women of Brewster Place and Linden Hills. in Henry Louis Gates, JR. (ed). Reading Black, Reading Feminist: A Critical Anthology, Meridian Press.
• Collins, P. H. (1989). The social construction of Black feminist thought. Signs, 14 (4), 745-773. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3174683
• Collins, P. H. (2019). Intersectionality As Critical Social Theory. Duke University Press.
• Collins, P. H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.
• Combahee River Collective (1977). A Black Feminist Statement. In Beverly Guy-Sheftall (ed). Words of Fire: An Anthology of African American Feminist Thought (pp. 231–240). The New York Press.
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
• Davis, A. (1981). Women, Race, and Class. Penguin.
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful, Feminist Theory, 9 (1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
• Dill, B.T. (2009). Intersections, identities, and Inequalities in Higher Education, in B.T. Dill and R. Zambrana (Eds), Emerging Intersections: Race, Class, and Gender in Theory, Policy, and Practice (pp. 229–252). Rutgers University Press.
• Gramsci, A. (1971). The Prison Notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart Press.
• Hancock, A.M. (2016). Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford University Press.
• hooks, b. (2004). The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. Atria Books.
• hooks, b. (2000). Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. South End Press.
• Karunesh and Somveer (2015). Suppression to self-assertion: Journey of Black woman in Gloria Naylor’s The Women of Brewster Place, The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 6 (1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://www.the-criterion.com/suppression-to-self-assertion-journey-of-black-woman-in-gloria-naylors-the-women-of-brewster-place/
• May, M. V. (2015). Pursuing intersectionality, unsettling dominant imaginaries. Routledge.
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30 (3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
• Morgado, M.G. (2022). Oppression in Gloria Naylor’s The Women of Brewster Place: A reading through the Lens of Black feminism and intersectionality. GAUDEAMUS. Journal of the Association of Young Researchers of Anglophone Studies. 2, 125–143. Retrieved from https://www.gaudeamusjournal.org/index.php/gaudeamus/article/view/28/28
• Nash, J. C. (2019). Black Feminism Reimagined After Intersectionality. Duke University Press.
• Naylor. G. (1983). The Women of Brewster Place: A Novel in Seven Stories. Penguin Books.
• Ramsay, N. (2014). Intersectionality: A Model for Addressing the Complexity of Oppression and Privilege. Pastoral Psychology, 63, 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-013-0570-4
• Robnett, B. (1996). African American Women in the Civil Rights Movement, 1954–1965: Gender, Leadership, and Micromobilization, American Journal of Sociology, 101 (6), 1661–1693. https://doi.org/10.1086/230870
• Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. University of Minnesota Press.
• Smith, B. (1998). The truth that never hurts: Writings on race, gender, and freedom. Rutgers University Press.
• Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer, 59 (1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.
• White, E. F. (2001). Dark Continent of Our Bodies: Black Feminism and the Politics of Respectability. Temple University Press.
• Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752