Voleybol Hakemlerinin Takım Sargınlığı ve Öz-Yeterlik Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 209 - 222

Onur Akyüz , Hamdullah Ateş , Nurdan Ateş

https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.1575195

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, voleybol hakemlerinin takım sargınlığı ve öz-yeterlik düzeylerini incelemektir. Araştırma grubu 2022-2023 voleybol sezonunda Türkiye Voleybol Federasyonu’na bağlı, 138’i kadın, 142’si erkek olmak üzere toplam 280 voleybol hakemi yer almaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak “Kişisel Bilgi Formu”, “Hakem Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği” ve “Grup Sargınlığı Envanteri” kullanılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin analizinde SPSS 24.0 programından yararlanılmıştır. İstatistiksel yöntem olarak Independent Sample T-Test ve ANOVA Testi uygulanmış, anlamlılık düzeyi p<0,05 alınmıştır. Bulgulara göre cinsiyet değişkeni açısından grubun görev bütünlüğü ve grubun görev çekiciliği alt boyutlarında değişiklik tespit edilmiştir. Yine hakemlik yılı değişkenine göre grubun sosyal bütünleşmesi ve grubun görev bütünleşmesinde farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Hakemlerin öz-yeterlik düzeylerinde hakemlik yılı değişkenine göre farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Hakemlik seviyesine göre grubun görev bütünleşmesi boyutunda farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak voleybol hakemlerinin deneyimleri arttıkça öz-yeterlik düzeylerinin arttığı, hakemlik seviyeleri yükseldikçe de görevde bütünleşme düzeylerinin arttığı belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Voleybol hakemleri, Takım sargınlığı, Öz yeterlik

Investigation of Team Cohesion and Self-Efficacy Levels of Volleyball Referees

Öz

The aim of the study is to examine the team cohesion and self-efficacy levels of volleyball referees. The research group includes a total of 280 volleyball referees, 138 female and 142 male, affiliated with the Turkish Volleyball Federation for the 2022-2023 volleyball season. "Personal Information Form", "Referee Self-Efficacy Scale" and "Group Environment Questionnaire" were used to collect data in the study. SPSS 24.0 program was used in the analysis of the research data. Independent sample t test and anova test were applied as statistical methods and p<0,05 significance level was taken. According to the findings, a change was found in the sub-dimensions of task integrity and task attractiveness of the group in terms of gender variable. Again, a difference was found in the social integration of the group and task integration of the group according to the years of refereeing. There was a difference in the self-efficacy levels of the referees according to the year of refereeing. A difference was found in the task integration dimension of the group according to the refereeing level. As a result, it was determined that as the experience of volleyball referees increased, their self-efficacy levels increased and as their refereeing levels increased, their task integration levels increased.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Volleyball referees, Team cohesion, Self-efficacy

Kaynakça

• Adıgüzel, N. S. (2018). Examining the Relationship between Basketball Referees’ Physical Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy. Journal of National Sport Sciences, 2(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.30769/usbd.482410
• Aguilar, J.L., Castillo-Rodriguez, A., Chinchilla-Minguet, J. L., & Onetti-Onetti, W. (2021). Relationship between age, category and experience with the soccer referee’s self-efficacy. PeerJ, 9, Article e11472. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11472
• Akyüz, O. (2023). Examination of team cohesion and narcissism levels in football players. Doctoral Thesis. University of Ankara. Institute of Health Sciences. Ankara.
• Aragao P. J., Passos, A. M., Maynard, M. T., & Sinval, J. (2021). Self-efficacy, mental models and team adaptation: A first approach on football and futsal refereeing. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 52, Article 101787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101787
• Arı, A., & Erdem, T. (2022). Examination of wrestling referees's self-efficacy levels. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 24(3), 264-270.
• Ateş, H., & Ateş, N. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between volleyball coaches' psychological well-being levels and self-efficacy levels. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science, 6(1-Special Issue of the 100th Anniversary of the Republic), 1045-1059. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1374634
• Ateş, N. (2023). Examination of team combination levels of volleyball players according to some variables. Online Journal of Recreation & Sports, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.22282/tojras.1309825
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual reviev of psychology, 54(1), 1-26 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem.
• Canpolat, A. M., & Çetinkalp, Z. K. (2011). Relationship between perception of success and self-efficacy of secondary school student-athlete. Selçuk Unıversity Journal of Physıcal Education and Sport Science, 13(1), 14–19.
• Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J. L. Duda, Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226). Fitness Information Technology.
• Ceylan, T., Ermiş, E., Ceylan, L., & Erilli, N. A. (2020). Examination of cohesion and self-sufficiency levels of football referees. The Journal of International Social Research 13(75), 934-940.
• Corbu, A., Peláez Z. M. J., & Salanova, M. (2021). Positive psychology micro-coaching intervention: Effects on psychological capital and goal-related self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 566293.
• Demir, G. T., Namlı, S., & Cicioğlu, H. İ. (2018). Group envıronment and empathy level of football and volleyball players. Social Mantality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 4(13), 846-859 http://doi.org/10.31576/smryj.109
• Dereceli, Ç., Ünlü, H., & Erbaş, M. K. (2019). Investigation of self-efficacy levels of football referees. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 9(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.455536
• Dodt, M., Fasold, F., & Memmert, D. (2022). Personality profile of team handball referees at expert level. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 52(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-021-00759-x
• Durdubaş, D. (2013). Determining the effects of a season long team building ıntervention through team goal setting on team cohesion and motivational climate. Master Thesis. University of Hacettepe. Institute of Health Sciences. Ankara.
• Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Human Kinetics. 14-20.
• Görgüt, İ. (2017). Examination of handball players’ team cohesion. Sportive Sight: Journal of Sport and Education, 4(1), 33-43.
• Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2017). The zest for work scale for referees: validity and reliability study-ZWSR. Gaziantep Univaesity, Journal of Sport Science, 3(2), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.31680/gaunjss.416737
• Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific research methods. 15th Edition. Nobel Yayınevi.
• Kocaekşi, S. (2005). Determine the relationship between group cohesion and effecting variables and succes in successful and unsuccessfull handball teams. Master Thesis, University of Hacettepe. Institute of Health Sciences. Ankara.
• Koçak, Ç. V. (2019). Investigatıon of the referee self-effıcacy levels of the volleyball referees. SPORMETRE The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 17(2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.552892
• Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Guillén, F., & Dithurbide, L. (2012). Development of, and initial validity evidence for, the referee self-efficacy scale: A multistudy report. Journal of sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(6), 737-765. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.6.737
• Öcel, H. (2002). The role of self efficacy collective efficacy beliefs and cohesiveness in predicting players, evalutions of their teams past present performance and future performance expentancies. Master Thesis, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Ötkan, C. Ç., Demir, G. T., & Halıcı, A. (2017). Examination of group cohesiveness levels and goal orientations of basketball players. Shs Web of Conferences 37(01041). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173701041
• Polat, E., Can, B., & Şahin, O. (2019). A study on the relationship between group cohesion and achievement motivation in team athlets. Sportive Outlook Journal of Sports and Educational Sciences, 17(1), 35-53. http://doi.org/10.33468/sbsebd.108
• Rovio, E., Arvinen-Barrow, M., Weigand, D. A., Eskola, J., & Lintunen, T. (2010). Team building in sport: A narrative review of the program effectiveness, current methods, and theoretical underpinnings. Athletic Insight Journal, 2(2), 1-19.
• Sarıdede, Ç. (2018). Analysing self sufficiency level and decision making ability of volleyball referees. Master Thesis, İstanbul Gelişim University, Institute of Health Sciences, İstanbul.
• Sevinç, K., Gerek, Z., & Arslan, E. (2021). Examining the empathic tendencies and referee selfefficacy of volleyball referees. Internatioanl Journal of Exercise Psychology, 3(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.51538/intjourexerpsyc.955462
• Sivri, S. (2023). Examining the self-efficacy levels of tennis officials. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 25(3), 369-378.
• Tapşın, F. O., & Doğan, N. E. K. (2024). Football investigation of the struggle and threat situations of referees in sports. Journal os Sports fot All and Recreation, 6(3), 284-289. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1512166
• Tuero, C., Tabernero, B., Marquez, S., & Guillen, F. (2002). Análisis de los factores que influyen en la práctica del arbitraje (Analysis of the factors affecting the practice of refereeing). Sociedade Capixaba de Psicologia do Esporte 1, 7–16.
• Turkish Volleyball Federation Referee Guide and Instructions (TVFRGI). (2017). http://www.tvf.org.tr/_dosyalar/MHGK_Belgeler/hakemlik_rehberi_ve_talimatlari_turkce_2017.pdf.
• Yalçın, Y. (2021). Group cohesion and perceived motivational climate in folk dance players. Balıkesir Universty The Journal of Social Sciences Institute 24(45), 445-465.